Preview

Settler Colonialism Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
967 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Settler Colonialism Summary
Samuel Elliot Morrison said “the New World gracefully yielded her virginity to the conquering Castilians” (Lecture 04/07/2015). This statement has more or less the truth to it; the New World’s untapped territories were essentially deemed the private property of European discovers the moment they stepped foot on the land according to Patrick Wolfe in his research paper entitle Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native (393). Settler colonialism was an uneven battle between the technologically advanced Europeans and the “uncivilized” natives that lived on land wealthy with resources— the natives never stood a chance at standing their ground. It is important to study the period of colonialism in order to understand modern forms of …show more content…
Wolfe says that “in short, elimination refers to more than the summary liquidation of Indigenous people… In its positive aspect, the logic of elimination marks a return whereby the native repressed continues to structure settler-colonial society” (Wolfe 390). Just because foreign settlers have entered a new territory and “taken” over the lands, this does not mean that the natives are subjected to oblivion. More often than naught, hints of the native culture still break through. This brings about the question of whom is assimilating whom. The practice of elimination, according to Wolfe, is not a simple concept. Due to its complex social formation and duration through time, settler colonization can only be described as a structure rather than an event (Wolfe 390). Yes, there is a day, week, month, or year in point in which the settler colony colonizations a new territory, however, that is just the start of the relationship between the two groups. Wolfe describes this as a structure because the two groups, like the treaties between the Native Americans and the European colonizers, the “discoverer” must work with the “discoveree” (Wolfe 391). 
 Settler colonialism set the stage for contemporary forms of globalization. The global north operates not unlike the colonial powers of …show more content…
The global north, as an advanced, “superior” power, is able to swoop into the territories of the global south and extract materials for its use. Due the matchup of power versus poverty, power always wins. Just as Harvey Rosenthal observed, “the American right to buy always superseded the Indian right not to sell” (Wolfe 391). The global north, like European powers, ignores native sovereignty because the they had “discovered” the new territory (Wolfe 391). “Consummated by possession” proclaimed the right to occupancy for European colonizers through the doctrine of discovery (Wolfe 393). The natives never had the rights to occupancy, so declaration of the European dominion automatically negated the native title to land (Wilfe 393). Native “free” land became European private property as an inherent right from discovery (Lecture 04/07/2015). 
 To produce raw materials that fed cosmopolitan desires there was a large demand for colonial land. The slaved African American of early America is not too different from the Asian sweatshop workers that produce many of today’s goods. The global north willingly takes advantage of the weaker global south because of the large pool of cheap labor source and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article written by Benjamin Madley on the California Yuki Indians, he talks about how a mass population of the Yuki Indians in 1854 and was rapidly banished due to a war by the Missourians. Madley further emphasise on how the declined population of the Yuki tribe was so destructive. And how a vast majority on California’s natives were soon disappearing as he refers the article to “Defining Genocide in American History”. He uses many detailed examples to further argue his article. By using pictures and graphs as well as defining what Genocide means.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Last Colonial Massacre by Greg Grandin is about the Panzós massacre of the Q’eqchi Mayans in 1978. This was unfortunately a violent precursor the Scorched-Earth campaign of the 80’s that would kill many more Q’eqchi. This book, while examining an individual event on a personalized level through the life of Adelina Caal, a focus of the last chapter, this book shows the effects of Neoliberalism, the US’s involvement in Latin America in the Cold War, and ethnic tension stemming from cultural differences and the racial caste system of Spanish rule.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harris’ first section, “The General Argument,” provides a foundational understanding of European land ownership and management systems, the development and proliferation of “cravings for independence” (471) following Payne’s The Rights of Man, and the challenges associated with encountering both indigenous populations and forests in colonial territories (472). In this first section, Harris also…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other forces of assimilation that rose up near the introduction of the Indian Act was both the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act of 1869 (Henderson, “Indian Act”). Both these acts were responsible for stripping the status of First Nations people (Henderson, “Indian Act”). They “were almost uniformly aimed at removing any special distinction or rights afforded First Nations peoples and at assimilating them into the larger settler population (Henderson, “Indian Act”).” The only perk a First Nations person would gain in voluntarily abandoning their rights, is to gain the right to vote, which was later acquired in 1960 (Henderson, “Indian Act”). Describing the forces of assimilation allows the reader to understand…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A similar vein of thought exists within the piece, “Proceedings of the Lake Mohonk Conference,” in which speakers push the idea that assimilationist narratives are generous toward indigenous people and helpful for society. Speakers deemed assimilation necessary, not only for the United States as a whole, but for the indigenous population as well, who were not regarded as full persons until they became “civilized” (“Proceedings of the Lake Mohonk Conference” 11). People with indigenous identities were not only treated poorly, but their identities were also mocked and considered unimportant and primitive, and one speaker within the conference claimed that giving up one’s indigenous culture may be necessary if it “will buy them life, manhood, civilization, and Christianity” (“Proceedings of the Lake Mohonk Conference” 11). The loss of one's culture in this context was seen as a slight, unfortunate price to pay for citizenship and civilization, and an assumption existed that indigenous people would want to give up their culture in exchange for a place in white…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All through the historical backdrop of the New World, there has been strife between indigenous populaces and approaching pioneers that usurp the land and assets. The uncovered histories and ficticious belief surrounding the Trail of Tears and the victory of the Incas and other local societies reminds us as readers that genocide and ethnic purifying leaves a sign of an awesome misfortune on American…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a whole, European settlers and Native Americans were constantly clashing over ‘ownership’ of land, as well as simple quarrelling in general. Between the spread of disease and multiple wars involving the foreigners and natives, the Native American population in the 17th and 18th centuries was on a decline. Additionally, there was a major loss in Native American culture due to the Christianization of the Indians by European missionaries and an increase in trade. European explorers and settlers had a negative impact on American Indians because of the massive loss of life, whether because of war or disease, and a loss of culture amongst the people.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English settlers developed a selection of stereotypes against the Native Americans, ranking them as uncivilized and thus making it easier on themselves to lead the culture into their impossible situation, where the Natives have no choice but to either fight and lose or sit and do nothing, however if assimilation could have occurred through education or social structure the final outcome could have been mutually just for the two civilizations.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Impact of Sectionalism

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The economies of the two biggest sections of the United States, the south and the north, posed as an immense gap between the two. Due to its farm based economy, slaves were introduced to do much of the labor needed to produce cash crops such as tobacco and cotton that the south’s…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During colonial times, people went out to explore and conquer new land. In history we often only get to see one side of the story, and do not get a chance to see the bad side of things. For example, many people view Christopher Columbus as a great hero who discovered the Americas and showed the native people new things. In reality Columbus's expedition hurt the indigenous people more than helped. Once the explorers got to the new land they saw it as an economic potential, a way to make money off the native people. This would be an easy task at first because of the technological advances and the superiority of these new people. The Europeans would use the natives as slaves to perform a variety of tasks. For example, they would be sold and traded to help build…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a rule, the Native Americans are perhaps the most overlooked sector of the population of the colonies. This war completely varied their knowledge of their land and its value. “We know our lands have now become more valuable,” (Document B). No more would they be fooled by the trickery that cheated them of Manhattan Island; no longer were they ignorant to real estate. They opposed the immigrants who settled in their lands, pleading with the colonists to control these squatters lest violence should ensue. “Your people daily settle on these lands…we must insist on your removing them, as you know they have no right to settle,” (Document B).…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When America was born, there was a division between the North and the South. As people immigrated to the colonies for a new beginning, individual perceptions of freedom began to split the North and the South. The South was rich and fertile. The people desiring land moved to this area with a strong sense of independence. These people wanted to be governed more by their state and less by the federal government. Having less federal involvement in their lives protected this independence. The huge cotton plantations formed required a large amount of workers. Once slaves had been utilized to compensate for this demand, an extensive economical system developed and the South became dependent on slavery to continue their way of life. The North, however, moved more towards mercantilism and agriculture. Using products derived from the South and participating in international trade with outside countries, the North began to expand into cities with a variety of people making up the populations. Slavery was not typically used, or at least it was…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the seventeenth century, Native Americans greeted European settlers with much excitement. They regarded settlers as strange, but were interested to learn about the new tools and weapons Europeans brought with them. The native people were more than accommodating to the settlers, but as time passed, Europeans took advantage of their generosity. “Once these newcomers disembarked and began to feel their way across the continent, they forever altered the course and pace of native development.” Native Americans and Europeans faced many conflicts due to their vast differences in language, religion and culture. European settlers’ inability to understand and respect Native Americans lead to many struggles that would eventually erupt into violent warfare.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Colonization in Reverse by Louise Bennet, Patois resonated with me because the poem was written in Patois. In Louise Bennett’s poem, a fence side conversation written to the poet’s friend Miss Mattie, the poet is giving Miss Mattie her take on Jamaican migration to the Motherland. Bennett’s poem emphasizes the idea of leaving one's home country to start a new life somewhere else. Moving to Britain could provide Jamaicans with opportunities that they could not be afforded in Jamaica. However, if many Jamaicans left the island and moved to Britain, which is their motherland, Jamaica could be colonized. Because the roles are reversed and Jamaicans are the colonizers, the speaker wonders how Britain will react and respond. Upon reflecting on…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays