Seed Germinated
Are reaoson and emotion equally necessary in justifying ethical decisions?
Ethical decisions varies widely, it can be in the form of Human Science, Religion and everything else that you can find in the AoK. In this essay, i will analyse wether reason and emotion as a way of knowing is equally necessary in justifying ethical decisions, due to how the question is aiming towards the analysis of both the WoKs and with the AoKs surrounding them. This essay will also be answering the question in terms of my personal answer, which will be both reason and emotion are equally necessary to some extent in justifying ethical decisions. Reason and Emotion are both very different yet linked WoKs. Ethical decisions are the decision making of ethics, which are the personal perception of the right and the wrong. Suming up my own definitions of the WoK and the definition written, connecting it all with the question, how do we measure the equality of reason and emotion?. Emotion and Reason are not something you can measure since they are not an object, so the wonder wonders around, how can we measure the equality of both?
To begin with, reason is “the power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgements logically” (quoted from http://www.theoryofknowledge.net/ways-of-knowing/reason/). Defining that, during the World War 2, just before the prolapse of Germany taken over by the leading Russians, Adolf Hitler known as the most heartless vicious leader of the Nazi's, committed suicide by gunshot in 1945, 30th of April in Berlin in his underground bunker just before the Russians could caught him. This shows that the most infamous leader of all time, Adolf Hitler had made his own ethical decisions by running away from what might be his worst nightmare, captured by the Russians. Long time pain and torture would've been his lesson for the cruelty he has done. “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by
Ethical decisions varies widely, it can be in the form of Human Science, Religion and everything else that you can find in the AoK. In this essay, i will analyse wether reason and emotion as a way of knowing is equally necessary in justifying ethical decisions, due to how the question is aiming towards the analysis of both the WoKs and with the AoKs surrounding them. This essay will also be answering the question in terms of my personal answer, which will be both reason and emotion are equally necessary to some extent in justifying ethical decisions. Reason and Emotion are both very different yet linked WoKs. Ethical decisions are the decision making of ethics, which are the personal perception of the right and the wrong. Suming up my own definitions of the WoK and the definition written, connecting it all with the question, how do we measure the equality of reason and emotion?. Emotion and Reason are not something you can measure since they are not an object, so the wonder wonders around, how can we measure the equality of both?
To begin with, reason is “the power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgements logically” (quoted from http://www.theoryofknowledge.net/ways-of-knowing/reason/). Defining that, during the World War 2, just before the prolapse of Germany taken over by the leading Russians, Adolf Hitler known as the most heartless vicious leader of the Nazi's, committed suicide by gunshot in 1945, 30th of April in Berlin in his underground bunker just before the Russians could caught him. This shows that the most infamous leader of all time, Adolf Hitler had made his own ethical decisions by running away from what might be his worst nightmare, captured by the Russians. Long time pain and torture would've been his lesson for the cruelty he has done. “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by