Preview

Section 4 Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Section 4 Pros And Cons
We affirm resolved: “The supreme court rightly decided that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.”
Whoever proves the Supreme Court’s decision based on constitutionality wins. The round shall not stray to the effectiveness or benefits of Section 4 and instead should focus on constitutionality.

Contention 1: Section 4 is unconstitutional because it is outdated and fails strict scrutiny.
A. The preclearance formula is outdated and cannot be applied to states today.
According to US Department of Justice, “Section 4’s first element in the formula was whether the state maintained [literacy] "test or device.” The second element is if it can be determined that less than 50 percent of persons of voting age were registered
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Brief Of California V Hodari
    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Brief Of California V Hodari

    Your Name: Marcos Zuniga Case Name: California v Hodari Citation: 499 U.S. 621 Date Decided: 1991 Area of Law: Fourth Amendment Vote: 7/2 Scalia delivered the opinion of the court, in which justice Rehnquist, CJ, joined and White, Blackmun, O’ Conner, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ, joined. Stevens, filed a dissenting opinion, in which Marshall, J., joined Procedural History: California v Hodari first proceeding were through the juvenile courts.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary
    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    A deeper focus and analysis on the Fifth Circuit’s jurisprudence in this area was required. The analysis focused on the past history of how the Fifth Circuit approached sufficiency arguments, and how its approach had shifted to the present (with Rubio’s case as the newest example). See footnote 3 and 4, and the enormous research required (footnote 4 as roughly 36 or more cases firming up a consistent pattern of Jackson’s application in sufficiency cases). By extension, additional time was necessary to detail how and why the Fifth Circuit had shifted in its application of Jackson over time.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United States Vs Lopez Case Study
    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    United States Vs Lopez Case Study

    They brought it to the Supreme court to see if Lopez should be convicted because he brought the gun to school. The issue contains the being stronger and better than everything else clause from Article VI named…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United States Vs Lovett Summary
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Vs Lovett Summary

    The defendant, Lovett, argued that the section 304 was only intended to remove plaintiffs in Court. They argued that the section denied the due process and equal protection. The bill of attainder was an issue that here accorded the best treatment it received during the litigation. Lovett, then decided that the case should be brought to the Supreme…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sessions V. Morales-Santana Case Summary
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sessions V. Morales-Santana Case Summary

    The Supreme Court case of Sessions v. Morales-Santana deals with the issue of whether or not a distinction based on gender in establishing derivative citizenship for immigrants violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection. The questions presented by this case are: (1) Whether Congress’s decision to require different physical presence requirements for unwed citizen mothers than unwed citizen fathers in order to pass citizenship to a foreign- born child violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection and (2) whether the court of appeals was mistaken in granting citizenship in the absence of any statutory authority.Thusly, the rights of immigrants and the right against gender discrimination are both at stake for the petitioner of this case. The case was granted on June 28, 2016, oral argument was held before the Supreme Court on November 9, 2016, and the case was decided on June 12, 2017.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch Vs Maryland Essay
    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mcculloch Vs Maryland Essay

    was drawn in a unanimous decision, but the Supreme Court held that Congress had the power to…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    AP NSL Government Civil Rights and Civil Liberties: Test Review
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    AP NSL Government Civil Rights and Civil Liberties: Test Review

    - The Act prohibits states from imposing any "voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure ... to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study
    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    USpreme Court Case Study

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    10th Amendment Journal Analysis
    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages

    10th Amendment Journal Analysis

    The most critical topic raised in Who’s Left Standing for State Sovereignty?: Private Party Standing to Raise Tenth Amendment Claims by Katherine Connolly is the Supreme Court and State courts oscillating view of the Tenth Amendment, the contradictory views between circuit court of appeals on the Amendment, and an analysis of private party Tenth Amendment standing. “In the decades since its adoption, American courts have vigorously debated the substantive meaning of this Amendment.” (Connolly 1540) Many of the circuit court of appeals have had a difficult time coming to an agreement on the underlying meaning of the Amendment. “Six circuit courts of appeals now hold the increasingly popular majority position that only states and not private parties may enforce the Tenth Amendment. Two circuit courts of appeals hold the once-majority position that private party standing to assert claims under the Tenth Amendment is permissible.” (Connolly 1541)…

    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study
    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott Case Study

    In the end, it is clear that Taney’s majority opinion should and most likely did strike fear into the hearts of states rights supporters. The Supreme Court’s…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Voting Rights Act Of 1965 Analysis
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Voting Rights Act Of 1965 Analysis

    Justice Ginsburg’s dissent argued that Congress’ power to enforce the 14th and 15th Amendments encompasses legislative action such as the Voting Rights Act. She believes Congress does not have unlimited authority, but must show that the means taken rationally advance a legitimate objective. By holding section 4 unconstitutional, the majority’s opinion makes it impossible to effectively enforce section 5. According to her, in voting rights cases the court should defer to Congress, because they have been given sweeping powers to protect such rights. The court should only ask if the methods used by Congress to address the problem are rational, and not subject them to a tougher test. According to Ginsburg, “Congress approached the 2006 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act with great care and seriousness, the same cannot be said of the court’s…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pro's and Con's Section 8 Housing
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pro's and Con's Section 8 Housing

    This is good for both the renter and the landlord; the amount of money section 8 pays for rent varies based on the voucher holder's qualifications. Once a voucher holder locates a property and is approved by the property manager, there is a string of events that take place. The voucher holder fills out a form that the property manager signs. The voucher holder submits this form to his/her case worker at the Public Housing Agency. The case worker executes a contract with the property manager. This contract authorizes the Public Housing Agency to make subsidy payments on behalf of the tenant. If the tenant moves out of the unit, the contract ends and the tenant can move with continued assistance to another property. In addition, the Public Housing Agency must conduct a physical inspection of the property to ensure it meets section 8’s standards of safety and code, after the inspection is approved and the paperwork is in order, the tenant can move in.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    VOTING RIGHTS ACT
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    VOTING RIGHTS ACT

    I conclude my argument by saying that the new voting laws is allowing history to repeat itself by hindering and putting limits on factors that is used for voting in election.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Voter Identification Report
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Voter Identification Report

    Holder, 2013). Shelby County, Alabama protested this section claiming that Congress had no constitutional right to do so. Because of the 5-4 turnout in the Supreme Court, that section of the Voting Rights Act was declared unconstitutional which was the final phase in the voter ID laws becoming effective. Without the national government being allowed to prevent Texas from applying this requirement on those grounds, the law was once again proven to be in accordance with federal…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement
    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement

    a. Article III Section 2 says that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in cases where there are citizens of two different states.…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics