Preview

Section 34 Pdf

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
468 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Section 34 Pdf
After reading your case, I have reviewed sections 34, 35, 36, and 37 of the Canadian criminal code to relate it to your legal position and acquittal. You will be able to use the self-defense offence defense to defend yourself in court. Section 34 establishes the rules for the self -defense offence. There are a few requirements that must be met before you can rely on this defense in court or else your plea will not be successful.
Primarily, section 34 states that one must have been assaulted without having provoked the assault. This first condition applies to you since you did not initiate the attack. The robber entered your bakery with a knife which will provoke threat towards the safety of your well-being and bakery products. The second requirement declares that the force used to repel the assault must not have been intended to cause death or serious harm and must not have been more than was necessary to defend oneself. The force you used was clearly not intended to kill him since you only shot him in the leg.
Section 35a asserts
…show more content…
While you did shoot him in the leg, there was nothing else for you to defend yourself with and you did not shoot him in an area of the body that could kill him. It was also only one shot which is reasonable. Since section 37 part 2 asserts that excessive hurt is not justified, you stayed within your limits and rights. Therefore, you can use the self defence offense to defend yourself in court.
Due to the reasons stated above, it is likely you will be let go in court if you defend yourself using section 34, 35, 36 and 37 of the criminal code. You did not use unreasonable force by only shooting him in the leg, you did not intend to kill him, and you stayed within your rights. All of these factors ensure that you have a feasible chance of being let

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    NRA Arguments

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Court approval of common law rule that a person 'may repel force by force' in selfdefense and concluded that when attacked a person 's as entitled to stand his ground and meet any attack made upon him with a deadly weapon, in such a way and with such force' as needed to prevent 'great bodily injury or death's'.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pistol 19 Case Study

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the case of scenario two, the shooting incident was taken place in a crowd of people when an individual was delivering speech on a slightly raised podium at a range of 25m. A low popping sound was heard by most people in the crowd but the shooter or the gun was not seen by anyone. As a result of the shooting, the victim had a small entry wound in the lower abdomen without any exit wound. In my opinion, the most suitable weapon I have chosen is Glock 19 4th Generation 9mm Pistol with an ammunition of Federal Classic Hi-Shock jacketed hollow point 9mm 115 grain ammunition, also used with a sound suppressor.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assault occurs when the defendant 's acts intentionally cause the victim 's reasonable apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact. The Restatement, unlike many courts, deletes the requirement that apprehension be “reasonable”. [See Restatement §§ 21, 27. See also, e.g., Castro v. Loral 1199, National Health & Human Service Employees Union, 964 F. Supp. 719 (1997).]…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ThI don't think Audrey Sellars is entitled to self defense claim for the simple reason that what she did was in the heat of the moment and that the verdict that was handed down to her, the court had sufficient evidence to support that verdict of voluntary manslaughter in connection with the stabbing death of Johnny Mitchell. According to the state statute dealing with manslaughter:…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On May 6, 2016 a police officer found himself facing a young African American holding a pistol. Police officer, Stephan Mader, was let go from his position weeks later for not shooting the African American with the pistol. Stephan Mader is suing the city because he does not think it is fair that he was let go for not shooting a person. The reason Stephan Mader did not shot the African American was because it seem that the guy, Mr. Williams, wanted to commit suicide by a police officer. Mr. William told Stephan to shot him. Stephan was trying to come down Mr. William until two other police officer saw Mr. William waving the gun and shot him dead. Then they notice that the weapon that Mr. William had was not loaded. A country prosecutor had…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first and foremost issue to be noted in this case is that of Francis carelessly shooting his gun in the direction of Nigel and also that of Nigel responding and in turn shooting towards Francis. Had Francis not fired his gun towards Nigel could there be a possibility that Nigel would not in turn shoot back at Francis causing Aiden to be wounded in the crossfire? Was Francis acting in this manner due to provocation from Nigel? Could it also be possible that Nigel reacted and shot back at Francis in self defence with the fear of being shot himself driving him? Could Nigel have fired back due to provocation from Francis? If these initial events had not happened is it possible that Aiden would still be alive today? Upon deciding to bring the victim to hospital, Nigel criticized Francis’s method of carrying Aiden (an issue which is not in clear violation of any law) leading to Francis abandoning Aiden and leaving the scene and Nigel carrying the victim in a very poor manner back towards to car. Had Francis continued carrying Aiden to the car, would this had meant that his medical condition would not have deteriorated due to poor care carried out by Nigel afterwards? Even though Francis did not shoot Aiden, would the fact that he assumed a liable role to help bring the victim to hospital, though not legally obliged to do so, but then decided to leave half way through render him guilty of breaking a law because he did not carry out the act of choosing to assist a victim in need of medical care to the best of his…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-defense: To assert this doctrine, the use of self-defense must be both necessary to avoid an imminent deadly attack and the force used must be both necessary and reasonable to avoid that deadly attack. No force can be used merely in retaliation or for revenge.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    which makes the use of deadly force constitutional only when a felon threatens the safety of the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt Ch 13

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Write out your answers and submit them using the Dropbox in a RTF or Word Doc format. Presidential Power and Iraq This exercise relates to the Policy Debate in Chapter 13 dealing with Iraq and Presidential Power. The goal of this exercise is to give you a better understanding of recent Supreme Court rulings on the limits of Presidential power during wartime and the importance of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. The Constitution (as interpreted by the Supreme Court) balances the need for security against the need for freedom and human rights. You will read and discuss two articles from the Christian Science Monitor, the goal of which will give you a better understanding of the limits on Presidential power and the importance of freedom.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Brown was an 18 year old African American teenager, who was fatally shot by Darren Wilson a white ferguson police officer. Darren wasn’t charged because of the Stand Your Ground law. A Stand Your Ground law is a law that authorizes a person to protect and defend one’s life and limb against threat or perceived threat. This law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place he or she has a lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if he or she reasonably believes he or she faces an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. Although some people may believe that the stand your ground law is just and fair,Many people could take advantage of the law by causing unnecessary harm to people, There for the Stand Your Ground law should be abolished.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timing is important when dealing with an armed gunman, as a victim you should be able to exercise your right to protect yourself and others. In fact, a poll was taken by PoliceOne, asking…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This self-defense law currently has 22 states that agree with what it stands for. States such as Washington, Montana, Pennsylvania and Kansas are among these that have adopted and inforce this law. Self-defense is critical to our survival in the world today. Many people have to defend themselves on a daily basis, depending on the area in which they live. I think this law is necessary for those who, on a daily basis, are threatened by violence. An example of this law in action is the Whipple vs Edwards case in North Charleston, South Carolina. In this case, Stand Your Ground was used for A’Kara Travil Kymberle Edwards who was “arrested in connection to the fatal stabbing of her boyfriend last summer has been granted immunity from prosecution” (Murder Suspect…). In this case,…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Self-Defense Law

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self-defense laws, also known as “stand your ground laws”, have been a significant aspect of many court cases. However, like most other laws, these laws can be used improperly and cause excess controversy around a case. Joe Palazzolo and Rob Barry’s article titled “More Killings Called Self-Defense” from the March 31st edition of Wall Street Journal brings attention to these self-defense laws. The case discussed in the article is an example of self-defense laws causing controversy, as many protestors believe these laws were used improperly. This is also a common issue as the number of justifiable homicides seems to be on the rise. Are these “stand your ground laws” truly being abused? This is the main issue causing the debate surrounding cases around the country.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science pace chart (Traditional) Segment One Pace Chart Week 1 Lesson Completion date 01.00 Introduction to Forensic Science 01.01 Do You Suffer From the "CSI effect?" 01.02 Forensic Science 01.03 The History of Forensic Science 01.04 Forensics and the Legal System 01.05 Other Forensic Sciences 01.06 Review and Critical Thinking 01.07 Lab Questions 01.08 Discussion Questions 01.09 Quiz Review 01.10 Introduction to Forensic Science Week 2 ___________ 02.00…

    • 788 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays