Preview

Section 187 Pros And Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Section 187 Pros And Cons
Section 187 (1) (f) basically states that it is automatically unfair to dismiss an employee if the reason for the dismissal is the employees’ race or age not only those reason, also factors like gender, sex, ethics, sexual orientation, disability, religion, political opinion, culture, language, marital status, basically being dismissed for aspects that relate to who you are or what you are instead of the job that you do.
There are exceptions to this rule (section 187 (1)(f))especially if they do fall as a requirement of that job, for example; a dismissal based on the age is fair if the employee has reached the normal or agreed retirement age for persons employed in that capacity.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In California, it is mandatory for drivers to have liability coverage when operating a vehicle. But insurance gaps can happen. Many don’t even realize their insurance is lapsed. Proposition 213 limits the damages an uninsured driver can recover. However, there are exceptions where you can still be compensated.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With consequential reprehensible policies, mass incarceration became a significant political issue prompting the need for federal prison reforms and solutions to an ongoing crisis.Likewise, California Proposition 47 is an attempt, along with Proposition 36, to begin the long awaited prison reforms. Thus, with the political enthusiasm surrounding Proposition 47, there came groups of supporters and opponents making political arguments regarding the ballot measure. One of the central arguments against of the Proposition 47, initiated by Californians Against Proposition 47, suggested that a proposal will “reclassify a wide range of [serious and violent] crimes from felonies to misdemeanors and would result in the resentencing and release of thousands…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended in 1986, protects employees who are 40 year old and over from discrimination in pay, benefits, or continued employment. Failure to comply with this law could result in lawsuits, back pay, and additional compensation for the employee filing the…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ADEA prohibits policy’s that will have a harmful effect on individuals 40 or over unless the employer can prove the policy is based on a reasonable factor other than age. On March 30, 2012, the EEOC published its final ruling on reasonable factor other than age which took effect on April 30th 2012. An example of an employment practice based on a reasonable factor other than age is a physical fitness test. Obviously this type of test would likely put older applicants at a disadvantage but if the employer could prove that it was a legitimate business purpose for the individual to pass such a test they would be allowed to do so without reprimand.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, if the employer can validate that age is an occupational qualification, this law would not apply. The law is administered and executed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and “[a] key objective of the law is to prevent financially troubled companies from singling out older employees when there are cutbacks” (Cascio, 2013, p. 109).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmation Action Plan

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is the Company’s policy to provide equal employment opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment without regard to race, sex, color, creed, religion, national origin, age, disability, marital status or sexual orientation in accordance with all applicable laws, directives and regulations of federal, state and city entities. This policy applies to all the terms and conditions of employment including, but not limited to hiring, placement, promotion, termination, layoff, recall, transfer, leave of absence, compensation and training. Advancement to positions of greater responsibility is based on an individual’s abilities and demonstrated performance.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LIT1

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) prohibits discrimination based on age, protecting employees over the age of forty. The protection applies to both employees and job…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is unlawful for any employer to discriminate by refusing to hire or discharge any person and or discriminate any person relating to wages, terms and conditions, or privileges of employment due to race, color, creed or national origin. It is unlawful to segregate or classify any employee and deprive them of equal employment opportunities and cause due harm which will affect their status as an employee based on their race, color, creed or national origin. [Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 200e-2(a).]…

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Diversity Worksheet

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which went into effect in 1968, was passed to protect workers 40 years of age or older from being fired because of their age and replaced with younger workers who presumably would receive lower salaries. The Supreme Court strengthened federal protection against age discrimination in 1996, ruling unanimously that such lawsuits can be successful even if an older worker is replaced by someone older than 40.…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) It shall be an unlawfulemploymentpractice for an employer(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to dischargeany individual,or otherwiseto discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation,terms, conditions, or…

    • 9192 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967 was passed to protect workers of age 40 years or older from being fired because of their age and replaced with younger workers who presumably would receive lower salaries (p. 396). The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act has been able to address particular issues concerning the aging population in ways that prohibit employers from discrimination against persons 40 years or older in hiring, discharge, compensation, terms, and conditions or privileges of employment. It too prohibits discrimination regarding benefit programs and retirement plans. Additionally, the Age and Discrimination in Employment Act includes limiting, segregating, or…

    • 2060 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Employment Law wk 3 for me

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 | This law protects people who are 40 or older from discrimination because of age (Cornell University Law School., n.d., Western Air Lines, Inc., petitioner, v. Charles G. Criswell et al). | Western Air Lines v. Criswell | Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 | This law protects people who are 40 or older from discrimination because of age (Cornell University Law School., n.d., Western Air Lines, Inc., petitioner, v. Charles G. Criswell et al). | Western Air Lines v. Criswell | The recognition that the elderly are still productive. | The elderly will not be excluded or removed because of age; the decision will be based on work performance. |…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality Act 2010 Essay

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is unlawful for an employer to discriminate again someone or treat them differently from anyone else because of their race or because of the race of someone that they associate with. An example of racial discrimination would be if an employer had a British applicant and an Asian applicant, both with similar qualifications and experience for the job role, but choosing to employ the British applicant because they don’t want an Asian person working for…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 introduced the concepts of protected classes and unlawful employment practices to American business. It is unlawful under Title VII for an employer to hire or discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his or her compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin. This covers hiring, firing, promotions and all workplace conduct. The statute applies to private sector employers with 15 or more employees and public sector employers at the federal, state, and local level. Title VII prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals on the basis of their protected status.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays