Preview

Second Morroccan Crisis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
264 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Second Morroccan Crisis
Second Moroccan crisis- Brief
Morocco was important to Germany and France, it was
- Close to Europe
- Great for Trade
- This meant expansion in wealth
- This meant expansion in Empire
Britain does not want Germany to attain Morocco for the main assumption that they want to build a navy base there that would threaten the British. After the first crisis where Britain and France had been able to convince the German’s too back off. A rebellion against the Sultan started and France offered to give their assistance
Germany were fuming, even though to the innocent eyes of the sultan he was being assisted to the Germans and the French this was just once step closer of gaining the trust of Morocco and taking them over completely.
The French Foreign Legion was at Morocco. But this wasn’t the only reason why Germany were in a silent outrage in 1910, France made a huge loan to Morocco and took valuable control of the costums and taxes.
France were ordered to stop the rebellion and realised Germany would suss them out, so offered to compensate with 100.000 000 square miles of the France Congo (worthless swamp and Jungle).
Kaiser Wilhelm (leader of Germany at the time) sent a Gunboat to Morocco it was obvious that he was daring France to make one false move but the legal reason was he was saving a Germans who were stranded in Morocco, (even though there was only one German on the south, where main Morocco wasn’t).
France are furious and all companies are prepared for war, Britain step in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * France borrowing from Italian bankers in order the fund the war, which created many internal conflicts.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Albert declared that he would not allow German or French entry through Belgium without any retaliation. (Ehlert, 49, PPEd). However, the failure of his attempt to force Belgium to allow the German army through peacefully did not altr his plan. The reason was due to his belief that the German army needed to be one the attack.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Why did the decline of the Ottoman Empire increase tensions among the European powers?…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 4 "The Great War"

    • 2432 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Germany went through Belgium to get to France which brought Great Britain (Belgium’s protector) into the war under the Schlieffen Plan .…

    • 2432 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismark Attack Paper

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Prime Minister then decided to provoke France into a war. He wanted to make sure no one would try and intervene in German affairs and bring some of the smaller German states out of the nation as a whole. He then adds insult to injury by suggesting a…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In source 1, JCG Rohl and Keith Wilson undoubtedly present Germany as being solely to blame, supporting the ideas of Fritz Fischer. Indeed, they highlight, “Far from being willing to accept British proposals for international mediation in the looming conflict, Bethmann Hollweg and Jagow advised the Austrians strongly against accepting them”. Therefore suggesting that Germany encouraged Austria throughout the July crisis to be aggressive and favored war over peace. Evidence to support this lies strongly with the blank cheque Germany issued Austria on July 5th, which pledged unconditional support for their allies in whatever action they decided to take against the Serbs. Therefore, by offering their full backing, they were knowingly giving Austria the option of war, thus it can therefore be argued that Germany pushed for the outbreak of world war one. This view is also supported in source 3, in which C Lee states, “methods of violence became the national vices of pre-war Germany, making the country an object of alarm to every leading nation”, thus suggesting that Germany was the main aggravator in the events leading up to war. Indeed, in the second Moroccan crisis, Germany attempted to bully France into giving her the French…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the next five years they harassed the French and made it unsafe for troops to move except in strength… Every country in Europe occupied by the French paid large sums of money into the Emperor’s treasury. The war in Spain drained away much of this money, which, like the men wasted there, might have been used to better advantage elsewhere.” (Truman et al,…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    with France. When he found out that France expected to be paid, he was outraged…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Describe one action taken out by Germany/France/Britain in relation to their empir ein the years 1900-1914?…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The empire already had colonies, but Kaiser William II wanted more, so they started with France’s. Inciting a conflict in Morocco against an already resentful country was not the best idea. France and Germany constantly fought, but they were not the only ones. Most of the influential European countries wanted colonies, and would do anything to achieve that goal. These imperialistic goals and disputes aided in the start of the war by creating previous grudges that would be fully executed during the war.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Belgium saw them as an easy target with big profits and imperialized. Belgium, as a western nation, also agreed to the ideas of Social Darwinism, the belief that the white European was better than the rest of the people in the world, chiefly based on their physical features. Simply put, they were racist. Most Europeans fell into this belief, but the Belgian people took this to an extreme. They enslaved the native people of Congo in their own country and forced work upon them. Quotas and taxes were created to ensure certain amounts of raw materials were gathered and harsh punishments were put into action for those who didn’t complete or meet their requirements. According to Mark Twain, “The amount of rubber needed to meet the tax requires the men to work for up 25 days each month harvesting the wild rubber vines in the Congo forest” [3]. According to this that would leave only 5 days a month for “regular” life for the Congolese people. They did not have the time or resources to educate themselves, make money, or to develop. In 1908 the Belgian government gave the natives better treatment, by taking away the direct ownership of the nation from Leopold and they made it an official colony of the Belgian government [4]. This decision came through by putting humanitarian pressure put on King Leopold. Conditions improved, schools, hospitals, and roads were built, but the cruelty and racism was still their because of the history they had of it. Also, the punishment, crimes, and cruelty was all that the people understood because they were forced to live in it their entire lives, and it was a hard to shift back. Even in today’s world, this industrialization and these policies have left a scar on the Congos. In both the Republic of Congo and the Democratic Republic Of Congo there is still political unrest and constant violence. On December 17, there were 22…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Ww1 Started in 1914

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From the early 1900’s , the two major alliances in Europe were on the one side the Triple Alliance between Austria-Hungary, Germany and Italy , and on the other side, Great Britain , France and Russia forming the Entente Cordial. It must be noted that, the Entente Cordial became anti-German after the two Moroccan crisis (1908 and 1911) , because of Germany’s lack of diplomacy maters. The two crisis, raised the temperature in Europe, and made war more likely. In addition, Germany followed ‘Weltpolitik’, a form of nationalism , that meant that she would support an expansive policy. Up to 1914, Germany was building up her army. This led to tensions between other countries over the colonies, such as France, however no one was militarily ready yet for a war before 1914. Nevertheless, Germany showed her intentions with the ‘Shleiffen’ plan as she had identified her main enemies and started to build up her army. So, in a very short period of time , the empires began strengthening their naval and military forces with great rhythm. This caused friction and suspicion between the empires, and sooner or later, the war would be inevitable.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Moroccan Crises and the Franco-Prussian war combined to cause significant tension between Germany and France in the years preceding the Great War. This tension proved to be a pivotal part of the beginning of World War I. Shortly after Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Germany saw its opportunity to implement the Schlieffen plan, and they took it . 91% of the German army…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years before 1914, tension had been building in Europe. One cause of tension was overseas colonies. For example Germany and France clashed over in Morocco, between 1905 and 1911. This started by France who wanted to have more colonies in Africa. As Germany disliked this idea and wanted to test the “alliance” between France and Britain, he decided to support Morocco’s independence. His only intention was to bother France and to test him, as he thought that the alliance France had with Britain was just a paper. France was angry with Germany’s ideas. He thought that Germany hadn’t anything to do in their affairs. At an international conference in Algeciras, in 1906, Germany was humiliated by France and Britain in front of the whole world and he was treated as inferior. This made Germany bitter. This proved that this two old rivals, France and Britain were now seemed very close and that it was more than just a paper. In 1911 France tried to take over Morocco again. They said that they were ready to compensate Germany if trade suffered as a result but in response, Germany send a gunboat to Agadir. Britain disliked this action taken by Germany because he feared that he could take control over the Mediterranean. So another conference was called where Germany, for the second time, was humiliated. As a consequence, France finally could take over Morocco while they tried, with Britain, to defend the Mediterranean in case Germany did something. As finally we can see that Germany’s ideas of the alliance between France and Britain were wrong and that the one that left hurt was Germany.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referring back to the pre-call for independence, the Algerians and Mozambique settler population felt that they were being mistreated by their colonial power. In Algeria even since 1942, according to the West Chester University, the French were mistreating the Algerians by taking over “French-owned” farms and forcing the Algerian ex workers to work for them. At the end of WW2, the Vichy French government increased taxes, specifically for the Algerians and implemented “racial policies”, that favored the French. Similarly, Mozambique’s were discriminated, as the Portuguese deprived with lack of education, lack of political justification and very “cheap wages”. Despite both Algeria and Mozambique being treated unfairly socially, economically and politically, on May 8, 1945, the Algerians celebrated the end of WW2, by marching in Setif, but the Algerians raised “the green and white flag” of Abd al Kader’s 1840 uprising, which angered the French, causing violence and resulting in 45,000 deaths. Being unfairly treated, the Algerians and Mozambique’s called for independence.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays