Activity 1 - A psychology teacher allowed his third period class to eat snacks while taking an exam. His fourth period class was not allowed to eat snacks while taking the same exam. He compared the test averages from both classes. Prior to this, both classes averaged comparable exam scores. a. What is the hypothesis?
Snacks improve a student’s test performance
b. What is the control group?
The students that were not allowed snacks during testing
c. What is the experimental group?
The group that was allowed snacks during testing
d. What is the independent variable?
e. What is the dependent variable?
The exam scores
Activity 2 – Fill in the grid below:
| Pros| Cons|
1. Case Study | - Allows for in depth study
- can study things otherwise impossible to study (brain damage, for example)| - the individual being studied can be atypical- only describe behavior; do not tell us cause and effect (or “why?”)| 2. Survey | - can measure attitudes, motives, and opinions- A large amount of data can be obtained quite easily| - wording may affect results- relies on honesty and reflection of participants- small rate of return is not likely to be representative- only describe behavior; do not tell us cause and effect (or “why?”)| 3. Naturalistic Observation | - results have ecological (real world) significance| - only describe behavior; do not tell us cause and effect (or “why?”)| 4. Correlation Studies | - useful for predicting behavior- provides quantitative data about the strength of the relationship| - only describe behavior; do not tell us cause and effect (or “why?”)| | | |
1. Experiment| - Cause and effect relationships can be determined| - may lack ecological (real-world) significance- ethical issues may limit...