Bloomfield came from the Neogrammarian School of linguistics. That means he focused on the historical aspects and evolution of languages. He studied particular languages, their history and how words are generated. Both Bloomfield and Saussure studied language as a structure or with a scientific basis. The main difference is that Bloomfield studied linguistics diachronically: its historical and comparative development. Saussure studied language synchronically: he made the comparison between language and chess. There is no necessity to know the history moves; you could understand the system just by looking at the board at any single moment. This is the synchronic study of Language.
Another marked difference is that Bloomfield himself never suggested that it was possible to describe the syntax and phonology of a language in total ignorance of the meaning of words and sentences. His view was incomplete, as he studied part of the system and not the whole. In contrast to this, Saussure studied Language as a system, including all aspects of it. He considered the system has three properties: Wholeness, since the system functions as a whole. Transformation, as the system is not static, but capable of change. Self-Regulation, this is related to the fact that new elements can be added to the system, but the basic structure of it can not be changed.
The conception of Language was different for each of them. Bloomfield believed that Language is related to stimulus response acquired by habit formation. He claimed it is used to satisfy human’s needs. On the other hand, Saussure considered language as a multitude of signs, where each sign links a phonic sound (the signifier) with an idea (the signified). The reason why they differed in this conception is because Saussure studied it from a mentalist conception. He considered both the signifier and signified mental entities and independent of any external object. Opposite to that, Bloomfield argued that linguistics needs to be more objective if it is to become a real scientific discipline. He believed that the main target of linguistic inquiry should be observable phenomena, rather than abstract cognitive processes. Therefore, Bloomfield rejected the classical view that the structure of language reflects the structure of thought.
As a consequence, they also differed in the conception of Language acquisition. According to Bloomfield, a child acquires language through repetition and stimulus-response. Through further habits, the child makes a start on displaced speech (he names a thing even when it is not present). Saussure, on the contrary, viewed language as having an inner duality, which is manifested by the interaction of the synchronic and diachronic, the syntagmatic and associative, the signifier and signified.
Taking everything into consideration, both Saussure and Bloomfield had a significant impact on linguistics. Saussure is considered the founder of modern linguistic and cultural studies. He has influenced several fields such as philosophy, anthropology and semiology. He is the linguist who revolutionized the study of Linguistics, as he outlined his theory of language, in which he suggested the need to study language in a scientific way, rather than studying it in a cultural and historic context. Bloomfield, for his part, did more than anyone else to make linguistics autonomous and scientific. Although Bloomfield's particular methodology of descriptive linguistics was not widely accepted, his mechanistic attitudes toward a precise science of linguistics, dealing only with observable phenomena, were most influential. His influence waned after the 1950s, when adherence to logical positivist doctrines lessened and there was a return to more mentalist attitudes. [pic]
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Saussure divides language into langue and parole. Langue refers to system of language, the rules and conventions which organized it. Parole refers to individual utterance, the individual use of language.…
- 745 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* Baugh, Albert C., and Thomas Cable. A History of the English Language, 5th edition. Prentice Hall, 2001.…
- 3098 Words
- 13 Pages
Best Essays -
De Saussure, Ferdinand. “Course in General Linguistics.” Literary Theory: An Anthology. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Massachusets: Blackwell Publishing, 1998. 59-71.…
- 7714 Words
- 31 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Saussure was a Swiss linguist who focused specifically on languages in history rather than general linguistics. (Chandler, 2013) His studies in semiotics began in the early 1900’s where he focused on the nature of the signs as a part of behaviour (Leeds-Hurwitz, 2012, p. 6) and believed that “language is a system of signs that expresses ideas, and is therefore comparable to a system of writing.” (Innis, 1986 p. 231) Saussure’s studies in semiotics lead him to the belief that speech is only possible because it is based on the system of language. (Barthes, 1968) From this he proposed a system of Langue (language) and Parole (speech) identifying the “relationship between “language” and “speech” is similar to that between “code” and “message.”” (Huhtamo, 2003)…
- 1268 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Sapir, Edward. 'The Status of Linguistics as a Science ' Berkely: University of California, 1929. Print. Culture, Language and Personality.…
- 1833 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
In this task I am going to identify 2 different theories of language development I am going to be doing, Naom Chomsky and Jean Piaget.…
- 1383 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T. (2002, November 22). The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569-1579.…
- 1394 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
and despair. It was heavily influenced by linguistics, especially by the pioneering work of Ferdinand de Saussure, followed by Levi Strauss. Structuralism identifies and distinguishes between “surface structures” and “deep structures” in language and linguistic literatures, including texts.…
- 1153 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Phonetics and phonology are related, dependent fields for studying aspects of language. Phonetics is the study of sound in speech; phonology is the study (and use) of sound patterns to create meaning. Communication could be oral, verbal or written, oral and verbal communication can be reinforce when words spoken are record while written communication can be reinforced when words and sentences written becomes legally binding. Phonetics and phonology is aim at ensuring universal effectiveness and clarity of speech in communication. Phonetics and phonology will help bridge the communication gap between the third world countries and the western world countries. Linguists study all aspects of language, from its formal structural properties through to the way it is used a represented in the brain. Morphology is the study of the internal structure of words. Linguists interested in morphology look at the parts that words are divided into and study the meaning of these individual parts. The main aim of morphology is to assign meaning to parts of words. Syntax is all about the structure of sentences, and what determines which words go where. Semantics is the study of meaning. Semantics is a highly theoretical research perspective, and looks at meaning in language in isolation…
- 1673 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
This paper was written by John J. Gumperz who is from was an American linguist and academic. Gumperz was, for most of his career, a professor at the University of California in Berkeley. It examines about the concept of how people talk through conversation, groups, and use their own way of communicating with people in reality outsiders, this called " communication via speech". people use language/ certain languages through speech, as well as communication. Specifically, language is by far the most powerful and versatile medium of communication; all known human groups possess language.…
- 799 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Also, we can mention that Bloomfield’s theory of distinctive features of meaning is similar to Skinner’s conception of the control of behavior by properties of the stimulus. Both of these refer to common elements situations in which the speech form or verbal behavior happens and how these common elements control the speech form. A difference between the two authors is that Skinner does not use the term…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Bibliography: Akmajian, A.; Demers, R. A.; Farmer, A. K.; and Harnish, R. M. (1997). Linguistics:…
- 7958 Words
- 32 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Pyles, T. and J. Algeo. 1982. The Origins and Development of the English Language. New York: Harcourt…
- 16383 Words
- 97 Pages
Powerful Essays -
According to Saussure, a language is arbitrary because it is systematic in that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Also, all languages have their own concepts and sound images (or signifieds and signifiers). Therefore, Saussure argues, languages have a relational conception of their elements: words and their meanings are defined by comparing and contrasting their meanings to one another. For instance, the sound images for and the conception of a book differ from the sound images for and the conception of a table. Languages are also arbitrary because of the nature of their linguistic elements: they are defined in terms of their function rather than in terms of their inherent qualities. Finally, he posits, language has a social nature in that it provides a larger context for analysis, determination, and realization of its structure.…
- 669 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
25. Pyles T. The origins and development of the English Language / T. Pyles. – NY : Harcourt Brace College Publishing, 1992. – 382 p.…
- 6363 Words
- 28 Pages
Powerful Essays