Preview

Sassman V. Brown Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sassman V. Brown Argumentative Essay
A male prisoner contends that California's refusal to allow male inmates to apply to the ACP violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. William Sassman is a male prisoner in the California Department of Corrections (CDCR). He applies for the Alternative Custody Program (ACP), which allows low-level offenders to reunite with their families early. Sassman, a father of two and a mother dying of colon cancer applies for ACP. He is denied by the CDCR solely on the fact that he is male. Jerry Brown writes this discrimination into law. Sassman files a lawsuit. Sassman v. Brown, 73 F. Supp. 3d 1241 (2015). Gay Grunfeld of Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP, lead counsel for the plaintiff states that, “Denying men the opportunity to reunite with their families entrenches harmful gender stereotypes suggesting that only women can be caregivers, and harms children by preventing them from re-establishing and furthering their relationships with their fathers. …show more content…
It also contributes to California’s longstanding overcrowding crisis.” The District Court orders the CDCR to stop enforcing the female only provisions constructed by the Governor and ordered to immediately stop denying applicants to the ACP solely for being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two police officers, while cruising near noon in a patrol car, observed appellant and another man walking away from one another in an alley in an area with a high incidence of drug traffic. They stopped and asked appellant to identify himself and explain what he was doing.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith V. Sate Case Study

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Answer: The hearsay rule prohibits statements made outside of court to be offered as proof, in admitting evidence. However there are exceptions to the hearsay rule, which includes statements made in 1) excitement utterance, this is defined as statements made while the declarant was under stress of excitement which caused it. 2) Present impression, statements made during or right after the declarant perceived it. 3) There are various records rules; such as public records which are marriage, death, and birth if reported to legal office, observations made while on public duty like how many times an officer has had disciplinary actions against him or her while on duty. Cases filed in courts prior…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2011 Lafler V. Cooper was a case where Cooper was being charged with assault with intent to murder and three other offenses for shooting a woman in the thigh and buttocks after missing a shot in her head. In criminal court they offered to dismiss two of the charges and to recommend a 51-85 month sentence on the other two in exchange for a guilty plea. After entering the guilty plea, he then rejected the offer after his lawyer told him that the prosecution would be unable to establish intent to murder because the victim had been shot below the waist. Criminal…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case the court considered the defendant’s argument that discrimination on the basis of sex because of safety concerns is allowed in certain situations. To help illustrate this point the court examined Dothard v. Rawlinson, a case where a maximum-security male penitentiary was allowed to hire only male guards to be in contact with inmates because more was at stake then simply their own safety. This case, used by the defendant, was rejected by the court in that in this situation the well being of third parties were not involved. The court also considered that while there was a risk to the fetus, the extent of injury that is likely to occur was not addressed. Even without this information, the policy reaches to far in that there is no showing that it is necessary to ensure the safe and efficient operation of Johnson Controls. The court also considered that until 1982, Johnson Controls operated without this policy and has since failed to provide information to lead one to believe that it is reasonably necessary to its normal operations or that they suffered any adverse effects prior to its…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law, but as we read carefully about it, it states that it gives “preferential treatment on basis of sex,…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The category I chose to explore was gender, gender can be a broad term that can include a person’s sex (male, female, or chose not to answer). This category extends to difference in treatment in the workplace according to gender, such as compensation, the hiring/firing/training/benefits process. In the case of Anderson v. City & County of San Francisco, Speckman (2014), indicated that 35 male and female deputies from San Francisco Sheriff’s Department filed a consolidated claim against both the city and county claiming discrimination against male deputies in violation of Title VII and California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Speckman, 2014). In October 2006 the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department implemented a new policy to prohibit male deputies from holding supervisory…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Dread Scott decision will forever be remembered as one of the worst decisions made by the Justices of the Supreme Court in United States’ history. The significance of the Dread Scott decision is the importance of the justices in the Supreme Court to practice judicial restraint, and what the consequences are when judicial restraint is abandoned for political gain. It is also a prime example of the justices interpreting the constitution in a way that benefits their own agendas. This poor decision had extreme consequences that shook an already divided nation, and led the country to the Civil War.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While this is a frustrating experience, until 1978 there used to be incidences where employers would fire women solely because they were pregnant. Woman would be passed over for a promotion because they were of childbearing age, or recently got married, and it is not surprising that this finally reached Congress. The court distinguished between the…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The law is an ever revolving door. Bills and other aspects of the law are consistently being revised or cited in other laws. In all that backdrops H.R. 2232, Vaccinating all Children Act of 2015 includes many things. This act is to amend the Public Health Service Act to condition receipt by States (and political subdivisions and public entities of States) of preventive health services. It grants that on the establishment of State requirements for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and for other purposes. The bill provides an exception for students whose health would be endangered by vaccination in the opinion of a physician conforming to the accepted standard of medical care.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Women in Prisons

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With that said this should be a loophole that should incur the need for a full review of the correctional systems that are used worldwide. In the light of the issue of women needing to have different correctional facilities, the issue should be used to illustrate the flaws that currently exist in the correctional facilities.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within 24 hours after passage, Brenda, a civil rights attorney, brings a cause of action in federal court to have the new regulation ruled unconstitutional. The federal court immediately rules that the state law violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment and issues an injunction against its enforcement.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equality Act 2010

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Age: In terms of employment, age is the only protected characteristic that allows an employer to justify direct or indirect discrimination.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays