Preview

Sandy Hook Shooting Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1127 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sandy Hook Shooting Research Paper
The Sandy Hook Massacre and Its Effects on Gun Control

The Sandy Hook Massacre is the second deadliest shooting by a single person in American history. According to CNN, this tragic attack took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. The shooter, Adam Lanza, brought three guns into the school, two of which were pistols, and one of which was an assault rifle. To get into the building, which had an updated security system, he shot his own way into the building with his assault weapon. Lanza ended up murdering twenty-six people. Twenty of the twenty-six were six and seven year olds. As the first authorities approached him, Adam Lanza shot himself in the head, committing suicide (CNN 1-2). Today, especially after the Connecticut shooting, there is an argument over the right to bear arms. One portion of the argument focuses on whether or not people even have this right. As stated by Michael Sommers, the second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Sommers 42) When the second amendment was written and passed, there was no professional army, only a civilian
…show more content…
In other developed countries, guns aren’t as big a part of the culture as they are in the US. We have become so gun dependent, misusing and overusing the power, that some people don’t know when it is proper to use a gun. Bernhard Goetz was sitting on the subway, when four African-American boys came up to him asking for five dollars. Goetz felt he was being pressured, so he pulled out his gun and shot the lads (Sommers 117). Also, in 2001, ten percent of teens thought it was okay to shoot someone if they weren’t from your neighborhood or if you needed to in order to get what you wanted. In 2001, 28 percent of teens thought it was okay to fire at someone if they insult you (Sommers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “Sandy Hook Shooting: The Speculation About Adam Lanza Must Stop” Judith Warner suggests that we should gun control and discussion a good way to avoid such shooting things happened again. Warner says that, there are many things we think we know about Adam Lanza, and there are many information about his mental health we got from his friends. Many people think we should care about kid’s mental health which is more important than gun control. However, there are many questions about Adam Lanza that we cannot answers too. Also, there are many things we don’t know about Adam Lanza mental health and we don’t have facts to prove what the problems in this tragedy. On the other hand, Warner tells us there are two facts in this tragedy. The first fact is Adam Lanza has lived in a home has a lot of firearms. The second fact is if he doesn’t have gun he will not easy to kill so many people in such a short time.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Lanza Research Paper

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout history there have been many tragedies, but one that is known as the third most deadliest shooting in the United States History is the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting that took place on December 14, 2012 in Newton, Connecticut. It was one of the most heartbreaking news headlines. On December 14, 2012, Adam Lanza killed his mother, twenty children from the ages five to ten, six staff members, and lastly himself. Adam Peter Lanza, who had a troubling childhood, found that going on this rampage was saving the victims from enduring the hell that he had experienced in the past. He had been planning this massacre for a few years before it actually had happened and finally worked up enough research to do it.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been and still is a lot of controversy on the second amendment which is the right to bear arms. Everyone including the government has their own interpretation of what this amendment means. I personally do not think that there will ever be a complete understanding about what “the right to bear arms” actually means and what is and what is not considered the right or wrong way to go about protecting oneself or just having a sense of security. All people are different, have their own beliefs, and have different opinions on what this amendment can interpret too.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nra Gun Reform

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Our Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights had created a virtual war over guns and gun ownership in the United States for more than two centuries. It reads The Second Amendment provides: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It is the only amendment written with a purported purpose. The only one with a preamble or perhaps an observation that; a well-regulated militia is a necessity for the security of a free state, and an objective or a legality that: the right…

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you never heard of this horrible event took it place on December 14th, when armed gunman Adam Lanza allegedly shot and killed twenty-six people , twenty of which were innocent children kindergarten to first grade and six teachers. Police also say that Adam was thought to have killed his mother before even entering this school. Sandy Hook is a well populated school with approximately 700 students. The school has a security system in which you have to be buzzed into the school, but apparently this wasn’t enough. The gunman forced entry, shooting out the locked door upon entrance, the door was shot out with an “assault rifle” such as a bushmaster rifle. Also the other guns found on the scene of the crime were a glock handgun and also sig-sauer handgun.(Sandy Hook shooting: What happened?). Now this is where it starts to get interesting. Some places you look for information on this topic you have multiple versions like any other story, but in my opinion the stories are more and more twisted even as time goes on, but your opinion is all that matters, and with that being said there are two videos I do believe you should watch.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To better understand why the language of the 2nd amendment was used in such a way at to regarding arming individuals and maintaining militias, it’s necessary to understand the history of the people who wrote it. A foundation of political thought during the Revolutionary period was the well justified concern about political corruption and governmental tyranny. The right to bear arms was a potential check against tyranny. According to Sandra Alters in her book Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People, “without guns in the hands of the early patriots, the fledgling republic might have quickly turned tyrannical, disarmed the people at…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment, the right to bear arms, was adopted on December 15, 1791. In that day in age, guns were not as powerful as they have become, and many who created the Bill of Rights could not have predicted the future. If the constitution, or Bill of Rights, had been written with the knowledge of today’s weapons the Second Amendment would be different. Now in the 21st century there have been many cases where the Second Amendment has been brought into question. These cases have brought questions that deal with the amendment having been written for civilians, but also the worry of the advancements that have been made in weaponry since the time the Second Amendment was written.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “discussions about citizens’ rights to bear arms extend back to ancient times. Political theorists from Cicero of ancient Rome to John Locke (1632–1704) of England and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) of France viewed the possession of arms as a symbol of personal freedom and an indispensable element of popular government” (“Gun Control”). As you can see, the concept of personal protection is by no means a new one. Due to America’s bitter fight for freedom from Great Britain’s tyrannical empire, the founding fathers firmly believed it was within the citizen’s unalienable rights to bear arms. Not only was this idea reinforced by the need to protect oneself from would be attackers, but also the government itself if ever need be. In order to solidify this right to the people the second amendment was ratified as a hard copy defense for American citizens to legally bear arms. As it clearly states in the bill of rights, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Bare Arms

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The right to bear arms has always been a constitutional right Since 1791 . The Second Amendment of the Consttution of the United States of American readers . A well regulated militia , beign necessary to the Security of the free state . the Secon Amendment to the Constitution of the United states was created to protect the citizenry from its own government. There are Laws that Forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . such make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants rather to encourage than to prevent homicides,for an unmarmed man many be attacked with greater confidence than armed man.the right to bear Arms is a constitutional right , necessary to maintain a free country , and allows the common citizen to defined himself : therefore , people must contact their legislattors and urge then protect the Second Amendment. In the supreme court case United States v. Miller ET AL. 307 U.S.174 Miller was subject to two possible interpretations. One that the Second Amendment was an individual right, and that the right is only extends to weapons commonly used in militias. The Second view of miller is that the Amendment guarantees no rights to individuals at all, and the defendants lost the case as soon as it was obvious that they were not a member of the militia. The second concern about the Second Amendment was does the right of the individual to own a firearm, is against state regulations as well as federal regulation? During 1876 the Supreme court said the right if it existed was enforce able only against the federal government , but it’s…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Debate

    • 2680 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Second Amendment text states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (Jefferson)” The argument over the second amendment is basic and complex at the same time. Most of the controversy is over the vagueness of the terms…

    • 2680 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the Constitution says, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Analysis of this clause varies depending on how one wants to interpret. For example, someone who views the amendment with the original intent of the framers’ might view the amendment as the states being able to rise up against the possibility of tyranny. If the president dispersed Congress and take away the State’s voice and choice to pass their own laws, that would be tyranny, and a state militia would be able to rise up against it with the weapons they were allowed to have. To a person who wants to read it as the amendment is written, the right to own guns should not be infringed because citizens need a well-regulated militia to protect our liberties. The difference is that the protection against tyranny is not implied in this belief. Critics believe that the Constitution should be read and interpreted as Americans now. To which, a well regulated militia is not what citizens have. Even though citizens can have certain high powered and high magazine…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States’ Constitution, specifically the Second Amendment, states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. This statement gives the citizens the right to bear arms, because they as people can be a part of a “well regulated Militia”, that is imperative to the “security of a free state”. Does this statement still hold firm, or does it not? Personally, I believe that there should be a tight control on the sales and distribution of guns in the country, as they are a threat to human lives.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays