Preview

Rome Revolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rome Revolution
Rome, in its earliest days, was governed by kings. However, Ancient Rome was to develop its own form of government that allowed the Romans to govern themselves.
In one sense, for a society that used its feared army to conquer other nations and reduced people to slavery, Rome was remarkably democratic when its own people were concerned.
Citizens of Rome would gather at an assembly to elect their own officials.The chief officials of Rome were called consuls and there were two of them. The consuls governed for a year. If they did not live up to expectations, they could be voted out of office at the next election. Therefore, competence was rewarded and incompetence punished.
In addition to consuls, there were other elected officials – judges, magistrates and tax collectors being some of them. Ten “Tribunes of the People” were also elected to look after the poor of Rome.
The consuls could not be expected to know everything. They were advised by a Senate. This was made up of leading citizens of Rome and when they met, the Senate would discuss issues such as proposed new laws, financial issues affecting Rome etc. There were about 600 men in the Senate. They were usually from rich noble families and what they thought went a long way to determining Roman law.
Since the Ancient Romans did not want one man to make all of the laws, they decided to balance the power of the government between three branches, there was first the executive branch, then the legislative branch, and finally the judicial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    tell me ab julius caesar

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages

    position in the Roman Republic. The consul was like a president, but there were two…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman government before Caesar was considered well established. Citizens voted for two consuls who oversaw Rome for a limited reign, the consuls where advised by the senate which was made up of retired magistrates. Caesar changed this all when he was named dictator for life giving him absolute power over all of Rome. Caesar had held office before his rise to head of Rome; he won several political offices, but Governor of Farther Spain won him his future. This position allowed his to ally himself with Crassus who was the richest man in Rome and who had gained fame by putting down a major slave revolt. The other man he allied himself with was Pompey. Pompey was a successful military leader and the three men used their armies and wealth to…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus had the ability to control the voters to vote for his reccomendation. In order to stop disturbances, senate gave Augustus Consular Potestas. This gave Augustus consul powers for life without being consul. This meant Rome would still elect two consuls every year.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why having a combination of different governments was because it prevented a select few to have an overwhelming amount of power. The government the Romans where so successful with was a mixture of a monarchy (one key ruler), an aristocracy (rule by few privileged individuals), and a democracy (rule by the people). The Consuls (monarchs) were there to make the important decisions and exercised their power over public affairs. The Senate (aristocracy) was there to settle internal civil disputes and settle foreign conflicts. The people (democracy) were there to decide what course the country would decide to take and what laws reflect the views of the country as a whole. Together, these three “branches” kept each other in check and one couldn't do anything without the consent of the others. The ending result was union and balance in which every member of society had an important role I deciding the course of the country.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Next Caesar was appointed Consul for the next ten consecutive years and was permitted to hold onto any office he desired inclusive of the Tribune. Subsequent, Caesar made changes to the title of ‘Imperium.’ Whereas Caesar could be vetoed before, the modifications Caesar made made him ‘immune from legal prosecution’.…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Annual elections for each year for all officers and center of careers were focued on becoming one of 2 consuls who oversaw the Senate and lead|…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The electoral assembly was voted in by the Roman citizens of Pompeii. Those elected were then in charge of electing the duumviri and aediles. The town council was made up prominent citizens with an honourable reputation and profession. They need be at least 25 years of age and reasonably wealthy. They were in control of all aspects of public life yet they had no military powers. Chief magistrate’s election was in control of the electoral council. They performed tasks such as conducting a census of the citizens every five years and replacing vacancies on the council. They presided over the town council and carried out their decisions. Magistrates were also elected in by the electoral council. They served for one year and were responsible for administrative purposes, supervision of the markets and upkeep of the town, e.g. maintenance of roads and paths, sewage and water systems. They were also expected to fund town games at their own expense.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome is also politically similar to America due to the enormous cost of political elections. In Rome, only the wealthiest people were able…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 5 ]. Dennis Sherman, Western Civilization: Sources, Images, Interpretations: Volume 1 (New York McGraw Hill 2004), 27…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the ancient times, the romans thought there emperor was “equal to a god”. For example, the crime rate was low in ancient Rome because they were feared to be punished or not make it to heaven if they were unfaithful or un- lawful. Then during the turn of the century Rome was later turned into a dominant monarchy by Julius Ceaser, therefor it was no longer a democracy. This is two reasons on how Rome changed during the time period of 100 C.E. – 600 C.E.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays