Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Roman Society

Good Essays
730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Society
THE ROMAN SOCIETY
By Anita Asare
The ancient Roman society was filled with such a complex system based on traditions, power, and wealth. Roman citizens held on to their pride and their standards of living quite well. Their means of living were quite distinctive compared to other ancient cultures. Some of their traditions greatly equipped American families’ lives in many fashionable ways, including their values. Their ways of life really inspired many elements in the American society.
The Roman society grew from out of a settlement of Latin shepherds and farmers on the Palatine Hill to a strong confederation of united peoples. It greatly exhibited such profound family rituals and respected values. The family was the most important and sacred bond throughout Rome. They had dependent clients and slaves that submitted under the chief’s authority. The leader or chief of the family was the father (paterfamilias). He was the supreme ruler of the entire family. The father was in charge of performing religious rituals and rites concerning the burning fire. The ancient Roman families build strong esteem upon their ancestors and looked upon them with such honor. The families were obliged to worship them as long as they lived because their ancestors brought them together (Morey, Ch.3). In ancient Rome (27B.C-1453A.D), the two main social groups were the patricians and the plebeians (History on the Net Group). The patricians associated with the equestrians and the senate officials making up the Roman upper class. The plebeians associated with the freed people, Latins, foreigners, women in the lower class, and slaves. All together these groups made up the Roman lower class. The middle class was non-existent. These classes were divided based upon economic, political, and military status or power (Talmor Media).
The upper class, which was represented by the patricians descended from powerful noble families. These types of people possessed land and lived in large eloquent homes with their families. Their powers were represented in the Roman Senate greatly compared to the lower class, who hardly had any say in their government. The wealthy patricians isolated themselves from the poorer and non-wealthy groups, by only marrying and doing business with their own members of the upper class (History on the Net Group). This class was made up of extremely well-educated males which had the power to hold certain officers. Since the acquiring of power was not hereditary, it was greatly enforced that in order to achieve power, one must be educated well enough and fight to get the throne. If the members of the Roman class were rich enough, they could enroll as equestrians (Talmor Media).

Plebeians, as well as the freed people, Latins, foreigners, women in the lower class, and slaves we held underneath the upper class (Talmor Media). They were totally deprived of their political rights. Plebeians consisted of artisans and peasants who worked on the plantations of wealthy landowners. There homes were small apartments and they did not possess any huge businesses at all (History on the Net Group). “They offered their services in return received the protection of the head of the patrician family, who became their patron” (qtd. in History on the Net Group).
The society of the Roman people greatly coincides with the American society in many ways, such as family values and traditions. Today in America, the father is the head of the home and they are the breadwinners of the family. The Roman Republic was a strong confederation of states, just like the United States of America. Like, the U.S. Rome beginnings were involved in loose, isolated settlements. The people were not as unified in the past (Morey). In addition, their social classes are similar with the social classes in the United States. The Roman Republic’s classes of society shows the basic elements of the classes found in America, although the Romans did not have a middle class in particular. The poor people in the U.S as well as in ancient Rome were not very popular in society and hardly ever rose into governmental affairs ( Talmor Media). The rich Roman people on the other hand are somewhat like the ones in America, possessing acres of land, businesses, money and a greater opportunity in running in government offices (History on the Net Group). This is the way Roman society was like in the old times.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 524 Words
    • 1 Page

    until its fall in 1453 CE. This part of the Empire was known as the Byzantine Empire.…

    • 524 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrician- Member of Rome’s richest and most important families who served on the Senate for life…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The upper classes were a distinct level of the social hierarchy. Rome and China both had a clearly defined high level social class. In Rome were the patricians. The patricians overthrew the monarchy and established the republic. The wealthy class dominated the government. Similar to the patricians were the landlord class. The landlord class of China held a vast amount of land bought from poor serfs and peasants. This landlord class had the ability to avoid taxes and mount own military if they wished to attack the emperor of China. In these ancient societies, wealth meant power because the upper classes could control the poor by monopolizing the ownership of land and sale of…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Roman Empire used to be a powerful empire, but that soon came to an end. Many problems in the empire weakened it. The three main causes of the fall of Rome were military weakness, foreign invasions, and weak leadership. If these problems never occured, Rome could’ve been the most powerful and successful empire in history.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The upper class was the highest of them all and the people who qualified to be in this category were very wealthy and proper people.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3) Babylonia had social classes, starting from the top of the social classes consists of free landowning class, which consists of nobles, people of royalty, officials, warriors, commanders, priests, merchants, and some artisans and shopkeepers. Next in the social classes group, are the common people, who usually work as dependent farmers and artisans, whose legal attachment to royal, temple, or private estates made them the primary rural work force in society. The lowest class in the social hierarchy was the slaves, who were…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hierarchy. But in contrast, the Romans were more benign on the one affecting the family’s hierarchy,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From C.A. 300 CE to 476 CE Rome began a steady decline to its collapse. Some historians disagree with this and have other theories. One of the other theories is that the Roman Empire did not collapse as the Eastern Empire did not collapse until “Fall of Rome at Constantinople in 1453.” The base of this theory is that the Eastern Empire became the Byzantium Empire, however it was no longer the Roman Empire as there were no longer any Roman Emperors. Another theory by Peter Wells is “The Roman Empire “fell” only in the minds of people who had a particular and limited view of what the Roman Empire was and who understood events such as Alaric’s capture of Rome in A.D. 410 as marking its end.” Wells argues that the change was extremely gradual and continued well past 476 CE. While Wells theory is more valid, the empire still did not exist after 476 CE.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perspectives (Gladiator)

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing the Roman Society can undergo into these different kinds of perspectives, namely, Functionalist, Conflict, and Symbolic Interaction Perspective. First up is the Functionalist Theory. A Functionalist Theory explains phenomena through functions. It has two elements which are the view from the society as a system of interrelated parts that are interdependent and the general values among society members. So how can we relate Functionalist Theory to the Society? There is only one word for that – Change. Change plays a big role to Functionalist Theory. Society is seen as integrated whole. A change in one part of a society leads to change in other parts as well. Society may change over time, but functionalist believe that…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In her article “The Hellenistic Family,” Dorothy J. Thompson seeks to demonstrate the ways in which changes in the Hellenistic family structure mirrored and influenced overarching societal trends. Additionally, she endeavors to illuminate the limited usefulness of applying generalized family models to the diverse and multicultural environment of the post-Alexandrian Hellenistic world. Through her implementation of a variety of primary sources (i.e., histories, stone inscriptions, papyri, ect.), Thompson presents a balanced and enlightening depiction of the Hellenistic family, which is both firm in its claims and cognizant of its limitations. By assessing the general arch of Thompson’s argument, this review will seek to illuminate both the successes…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The upper house, Senate, was exclusively controlled by patricians, the upper class of Ancient Rome society. The lower house, the Centuriate Assembly, has a huge representation by the plebians even though it was still technically heavily influenced by the patricians. Similarly, our nation's policy making rests on the Senate and Congress, with both houses counteracting one another to ensure that not one house exercises greater power than the other. In addition, in modern United Stated, a well-established, well-organized government consisting of the judicial, executive and legislative branches provided checks and balance. Nevertheless, elitism was a prevalent phenomenon in the ruling class of Ancient Rome, much like the current American elite politicians yielding vast political power.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Government

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the form of government in the Roman Empire changed several times over its thousand year history, many parts remained the same and it has served as a model, inspiring the founding fathers as they created the governmental system of the United States of America almost 2,000 years later. Scattered around seven hills in the middle of the Italian peninsula, Rome began as a simple village of wooden huts. As it grew, it became governed by a monarchy, with a king having complete control. This lasted for over 200 years until the king was overthrown and a republic form of government was developed. Although controlled to a large extent by wealthy land owners and nobles, the general population was given an increasingly larger part in how the empire was run. This form of government worked well and the Roman Empire prospered. However, social unrest in the first century A.D., coupled with several military defeats, ended with Julius Caesar taking control and declaring himself dictator for life, ending the true republic form of government. Assassinated a month later, Rome then entered a period of rule by an emperor, which lasted until the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Roman Empire lasted longer than any other government in the western world and it has provided the foundation upon which the government of the United States is based, along with providing valuable lessons for future generations.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Class System

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The structure of Roman daily life is quite complex. Considering class systems are involved in the Romans society. The Roman family is called a familia, it was somewhat different than the modern-day idea of a family. The familia included parents and their children as well as grandchildren, in-laws, slaves, clients, and property holdings.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics