Preview

Role of Kaiser in German Domestic and Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role of Kaiser in German Domestic and Foreign Policy
History Assess the role of Kiaser Wilhelm II in the direction of German domestic and foreign policy between the years 1900-1914.

Between 1871 and 1890 Otto Von Bismarck had worked hard and skillfully to secure Germany's position in the European hierachy. Alliances formed between Germany and other nations such as Russia and Austria cemented peace within Europe during the 1870's and 1880's, and Germany's isolation of France (whom Prussia had defeated in 1871) could continue. The use of realpolitik showed a government that was progressive and willing to compromise. What Germany needed after Bismarck had served his time, was a leader who could maintain alliances but still take Germany forward. However decisions such as ousting Bismarck from his position as Chancellor, served only to highlight Kaiser Wilhelm II's intention to actively seek a personal rule based on his 'divine right of kings' , that would disgruntle the percariously balanced situation in Europe. Since the Kaiser had the power to appoint members of government, the Reichstag had very little power as officials were responsible to the Kaiser. Wilhelm II determined the parameters of what was and was not possiblein terms of policy. His power over the chancellor and government officials effectively gave him supreme ruling power within the 'sham democracy'. The kaiser persued the policy of 'weltpolitik' as was his desire to transform Germany into a world super power, whether or not it alienated Britain, something Bismarck had aimed to prevent. Soon stemmed the implementation of plans to expand the navy to give the German Empire parity with Britain in naval warfare. The Navy League set up by Tirpitz in 1898 was designed to garner massive support of the plans to expand the navy. The bill of 1898 provided for a fleet of 19 battleships, 12 large cruisers, 30 small cruisers, and assorted smaller ships. Two years later, the Navy Law of 1900 authorized the further expansion of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite elements of democracy, with the Kaiser at the Head of the Constitution and holding such significant powers, Wilhelminian Germany was clearly structured to maintain authority and keep the power concentrated at the top. The issue is whether or not in practice the state was totally authoritarian and how far Germany was stuck in authoritarianism, or in other words; how much potential for advancement towards democracy there was. It also needs to be established what is meant by an 'authoritarian state' as the Kaiser's power can be seen in the reflection of other powers; the Kaiser was the head of the army & appointed the Chancellor, therefore the authoritarianism & power of these two can be seen to reflect the authoritarianism & power of the Kaiser.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How successful was Bismarck in maintaining his political control in Germany in the years 1878 to 1890?…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Second Reich constitution, it is clear that during the years of the Second Reich there was no democracy. The German Electorates could only elect the Reichstag, which had little power. The Reichstag was only able to accept or reject the laws that were proposed by the government and veto treaties agreed by the Kaiser. However, the Kaiser was able to summon and dissolve the Reichstag at any given time. Therefore most of the time the Reichstag would agree with Kaiser, which shows Kaiser Absolutism. This was similar for the Imperial Government. The Chancellor and the Cabinet did the day-to-day running of the Germany. However, at any given time the German Emperor was able to dismiss the Chancellor. Therefore at the end if something was not going according to Kaisers' vision for Germany he has the power to change so.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the years 1900-1913 the Kaiser' rule became less powerful as the years went on. Although he did still remain I power. On theory of this is the Daily Telegraph Affair in 1908. The Kaiser had slipped a very important statement concerning the foreign policies. As a result he was given an o confidence vote and had to make an apology to the government about his mistake. However the Kaiser still remained in power - showing that he still had an input in how Germany was run but it also shows that the Reichstag had gotten more confident as they are were challenging the Kaiser rule. This theory suggests that the Kaiser was becoming less powerful than he originally was, and between the years 1900-1913 he controlled German politics but to a minimum.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time period where Germany was looking to expand it’s reign outside of their borders, much of Europe was already under control of other powers and they were forced to focus their expansion on African territories. The problem with this plan of action was that the British navy was considered the strongest naval force in the world, and they already possessed control of many waterways leading to territories desired by both Great Britain and Germany. Due to this predicament, militarism in Germany began with great naval expansion “following the appointment of Admiral von Tirpitz as Secretary of State for the Navy in 1897” (Fulbrook 142). His push for rapid naval growth for means of both a deterrent to other nations and a means of competing with British naval forces lead to the creation of the Naval League and a strong national support for naval expansion, something that did not go unnoticed by other nations. German navy building brought about “a general sense that war was looming, and all European states began a race to be ready for war when it came” (Fulbrook 149). The rapid expansion of Germany in almost all regards and actions taken by other nations presented the inevitability of war, but other key factors also played major roles in the culmination of…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Describe the pros and cons of the German state at the outbreak of WWI.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The industrial ambitions of Germany illustrate the rapid growth of Wilhelm II’s ambitions in Europe after many decades of economic prosperity in the 19th century. These industrial developments define the increasing ambition of Germany to rival the naval power of Great Britain and the military strength of France on the Continent. In this context, the Kaiser sought develop a world-class modern navy that would threaten the imperialism of England as a dominant force in Europe. More so, Germany; massive heavy industrial complex allowed for the building of large warships, artillery, and other modern weapons of total war, which posed a direct threat to the neighboring European nations. Politically, England France responded to German industrial militarization by producing its own weapons of total war that created massive arms race throughout the 1900s and into the 1910s.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Administrative policies were symbiotically integrated with militaristic endeavors. The German military had been deemed a "State within the State" with the General Staff's control over Parliament and politicians (World War I). Military competition, judged relatively between the major European powers, bolstered war capabilities and instilled a cultural paranoia. "It is also important to take notice of the fact that from 1910 to 1914, while France increased her [defense] expenditure by 10%, Britain by 13%, Russia by 39%, and Germany was the most militaristic as she increased by 73%." (World War I). Germany in particular sought to expand its navy with the 1900 Naval Law which doubled its inventory to 24 battleships however, the British always maintained naval superiority with its Dreadnoughts. British obsession with naval dominance was strong government rhetoric which exaggerated military expansionism. A simple naivety in the potential scale of unchecked aggression and bloodshed of a war stemmed from the conscription program and technology. A delusion of possible invincibility and expedient triumph soaked the ideology of each major European…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As governments experienced many revolutions and uprisings in the name of nationalism, some countries’ respective leaders realized that their traditional conservatism would eventually destabilize their authoritative legitimacy. Thus, leaders such as Otto von Bismarck adopted a new kind of conservatism, mixing both liberal, semi-socialistic and conservative policies in order to keep a balance that would ensure some stability in his state. For Otto von Bismarck, his international policies were more conservative; he promoted nationalism, unification, and state sovereignty. His domestic policies, however, were more liberal; he allowed for progressive social reforms and implemented separation of church and state.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    (A) Write short pen portraits of Wilhelm II and Nicholas II explaining their rank, how long they had been in power and what kind of leaders they had been up to 1914.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kaiser's foreign policy

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    System of Alliances: Bismarck united Germany by war culminating in the Franco-Prussian war. After 1870, his foreign policy concentrated on keeping France isolated. Bismarck’s nightmare was a two-front war and so forged agreements with Austria and Russia to prevent this (the Driekaiserbund). However, Bismarck’s failure to reconcile the conflicting differences between Russia and Austria in the Balkans forced Bismarck to choose Austria over Russia leading to the Dual Alliance 1879. This created one of the armed camps that would fight WW1. Although he would later form the Reinsurance treaty with Russia, relations with Russia never really recovered. The French nightmare was isolation and as France and Russia moved closer to a full agreement, Bismarck fell from power. The fall of Bismarck in 1890 marked a great turning point in international affairs. German foreign policy was taken over by the Kaiser. William was young, arrogant and much less calculating than Bismarck and his foreign policy quickly reversed German security within Europe and eventually saw the emergence of a rival armed camp consisting of Britain, Russia and France. The shift in the balance of power began quickly when William allowed the Re-insurance treaty to lapse. Russia became alarmed at its growing isolation and, in 1894, the Franco-Russian alliance was finally agreed. Out of this came a System of Alliances that divided Europe into two armed camps. This defeated the central purpose of Bismarck’s diplomacy. French isolation was at an end. Germany would now have to fight the war on two fronts if she attacked either France or Russia.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics