Preview

Kaiser's Ignoble War Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kaiser's Ignoble War Analysis
Title: (A) Write short pen portraits of Wilhelm II and Nicholas II explaining their rank, how long they had been in power and what kind of leaders they had been up to 1914.
(B) Explain the meaning and political message behind any two of the following snippets from these telegrams:
Kaiser – ‘deserved punishment’
Tsar – ‘ignoble war’
Name: Laura O’Reilly
Student no: 14708891
Module: HI117 Writing the History of War and Society
Lecturer: Dr Gearoid Barry
Tutor: James O’ Donnell
Word Count: 1168
Date of Submission: 22 October 2014
World War One would see so many atrocities that even those at the helm would eventually feel its wrath. By 1917 Tsar Nicholas II of Russia would be executed by the Bolshevik’s, while Kaiser Wilhelm II
…show more content…
This war would see the last Tsar of Russia and the last Emperor of Germany fall drastically from power.
Kaiser Wilhelm II accession to the Throne in 1888 came at the age of 29 after the death of his father. Wilhelm was considered an erratic and narcissistic man. Born with a withered arm, a birth defect that throughout his life he sought to
…show more content…
Wilhelm’s telegram to Nicholas the II on July 28th can be considered both antagonising of the Tsar and his Government, and somewhat manipulative. The Kaiser states that it is of grave importance that the Tsar as ruler, understands that those responsible for the murder of the Archduke and his wife should be brought to justice and receive their ‘deserved punishment’. Aware of Russian interest in the Balkan area and the connection to the Slavic people, the Kaiser appears to be coercing a certain reaction from the Tsar. The telegram is antagonistic, playing on the perception of the regime’s weakness and inability to unite public opinion. It also insinuates Russian accountability for any future

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One consequence of World War I was that about 21 million combatants were injured and about about 9 million were killed during the battle. Another reason was that big areas of Europe were destroyed and the economies of counries fell apart. Influenza also spread rapidly killing many people in…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s lack of military experience and inability to rule the throne all together, additionally contributed to the devastating outcome of WW1 on Russia. “A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, an extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him- the Emperor Nicholas had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” stated Sir G. Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia in 1910, emphasizes how the urban lower classes were not the only ones unsatisfied with the Tsar Nicholas…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq on Revolutions

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This task is designed to test your ability to work with historical documents and is based on the accompanying documents (1–6). Some of the documents have been edited for the purposes of this question. As you analyze the documents, take into account both the source of each document and any point of view that may be presented in the document.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you may already know World War one was a brutal event that took place in history;…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914 Germany and Austria declared war on Russia and their allies Serbia. Despite the fact that in 1908 Tsar Nicholas II had put into action ‘The Grand Military Programme’, aiming to rearm his forces and get Russia ready for war, the plan was set to finish in 1917, not three years earlier. Nevertheless, Russia went into war with its head held high, with full support and enthusiasm from the Russian people. By 1916 however, this support for the war had changed dramatically, as the fighting at the front had lived up to nobody’s expectations. Russia was now occupied by the enemy, proving the weakness of the Russian’s defence and the strength of the enemy. On the front line one out of three men had a rifle, due to the lack of weapons and supplies the incomplete military programme had been able to offer. The number of casualties, missing in action and death toll was catastrophic: 4 million by the end of 1915. Evidently moral of the men fighting was almost at breaking point, it was clear Russia was losing a battle they did not even want to fight. Another affecting factor on the front line was the fact that most of the…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The early years plunging Russia into the 20th century brought humiliation and prevalent discontent and resentment towards Tsar Nicholas. The decision to push Russia into a war with Japan unprepared and overconfident was the first fatal mistake Tsar Nicholas made. The humiliating blow of the disastrous war with Japan was felt nation-wide and led the people to lose faith in their “little father” and “divine ruler”. “Russia was humiliated in the eyes of…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This task is designed to test your ability to work with historical documents and is based on the accompanying documents (1–6). Some of the documents have been edited for the purposes of this question. As you analyze the documents, take into account both the source of each document and any point of view that may be presented in the document.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ: Causes of WWI

    • 2043 Words
    • 6 Pages

    World War I—or the Great War as it was known at the time—was the result of a series of events between several nations around the world. The war was massively destructive for all involved, civilians and soldiers alike, and there were very few who were not affected by the worldwide conflict. The war has been considered a mass genocide, taking millions of lives and leaving many nations in shambles. The new, more advanced weaponry provided by the recently industrialized world resulted in one of the deadliest wars in history. There was no single cause of the event. Numerous conflicts and hostile relations between several nations around the globe escalated into a full-blown war that had devastating results.…

    • 2043 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Made Easy Analysis

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In “War Made Easy” , narrator Sean Penn steers us to look at American military conflicts from the perspective of the hard sell. Media/political critic Norman Solomon accuses the Bush administration of using misleading language, news manipulation, half-truths and complete lies to win public support for military actions of questionable necessity.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first World War, better known as World War I or the Great War, began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his expecting wife, Sophie, in Sarajevo, Bosnia during an open top parade. Despite the trauma that the First World War resonated throughout the globe, it led to a number of developments and innovations in society such as the rights of women, the end of class system, various form of arts influenced by the war such as poetry, music and paintings. New inventions such as the wristwatch, zips, stainless steel and pilot communication. There are also the inventions of new weapons and arms of which, after having been modernized, have led to the revolutionary technology and weapons we now have in the twenty-first century, such as the tank, machine guns and the use of poisonous gas.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Wicked War Analysis

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Looking back to American history, some cringe with regret at events that were catastrophic and villainous. While in some instances we overwhelmed with pride for the right decisions our ancestors chose. But it is events like the US - mexican war that brings us the realization that in order for America to be the great nation it is, the war was a necessary act. Amy Greenberg’s A Wicked War captures the lives of five important people that left their legacy in American history.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 1 Causes

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    World war 1, also known as the Great War, happened in 1914-1918. World War 1 was the first global conflict. More than 38 million people suffered from casualties. When fighting for war, the soldiers were in Trench Warfare. This meant that they were fight in man made trenches. Trenches would get deep and muddy. The soldiers had to live inside them and with the dead bodies that would fall, the soldiers would have to bury them inside the trenches, so each body was stacked on top of another. A spark of the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist. The causes of World War 1 was due to Nationalism, Militarism, and…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Czar Nicholas II Impact

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There were a lot of figures and events that contributed to the starting of World War I. These people not only affected the war, but they were often changed themselves. Czar Nicholas II is an example of an individual who helped spark World War I. However, more notably, he is also an example of how the war affected him in ways much larger than the way he impacted it.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    World War I: Analysis

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On the eve of the World War I, no country was prepared for using aircraft or would have even thought about making an effective weapon of war. Several had experimented with dropping bombs from aircraft, firing guns, and taking off and landing from aircraft carriers, but no country had designed or built an aircraft specifically for war functions (Century of Flight). During World War 1, they had made many changed to the aircraft to make it create havoc on the enemy’s. They would add many weapons to the aircraft to make it a deadly air weapon. The would then haul many people and weapons onto the aircraft and shoot from the top of the sky, so no one could really protect themselves (The Air War in Europe 23). Once World War two hit, these aircrafts got more sufficient in making their weapons more deadly. Air warfare was a major component of World War II. It consumed a large fraction of the industrial output of the major powers. Germany and Japan depended on air forces that were closely integrated with land and naval forces. The aviators downplayed the advantage of fleets who were strategic bombers, and were late in appreciating the need to defend against Allied strategic bombing. Britain and the United States took an approach that greatly emphasized strategic bombing, and to a lesser degree, considered control of the battlefield by air, and satisfactory air defenses (Wikapedia). They both built a strategic force of large, long-range bombers that could carry the air war to the enemy's homeland. Simultaneously, they built tactical air forces that could win air dominance over the battlefields, giving assistance to ground troops. They both built a powerful naval-air component based on aircraft carriers, as did Japan; these played the central role in the war at sea (Angelucci 46). Before 1939, all sides operated under largely theoretical models of air warfare. Italian theorist, Giulio Douhet in the 1920’s summarized the faith that airmen during and after World War I developed…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays