rogerian argument
EN 102
Spring 2014
Chisum
Rogerian Argument, 15% of final grade, 1300 words
Having analyzed a visual argument, a written argument, and your own writing processes, you will now be asked to present two opposing views on the same social justice issue, and, in whatever way possible, propose a solution that would please both parties.
Rough Draft (3 printed copies) Due: 3/18
Final Draft Due: 3/20 by the beginning of class via Turnitin
The Assignment: Using at least three sources, craft a Rogerian Argument focusing on a social justice issue of your choosing. Other than the off-limits topics, you are free to select whatever issue interests you, or in which you have emotional investment. Remember that, as a Rogerian Argument, you must objectively present both sides of the issue. That is, if your issue is the death penalty, you must present the arguments both in favor of and against the death penalty in the United States. Then, after having objectively summarized the main points of both positions, you must argue a possible solution or compromise that would, as much is possible, satisfy both parties, explaining why this solution or compromise would be acceptable to both parties.
Notes:
-Try to be as objective as possible. Think of yourself as a mediator between two warring groups. It is your job to hear out both sides, and to help them come to a compromise. Therefore, in order to do so, you must put aside your own personal reactions to the issue.
-Think of your paper as comprised of three parts: the argument in favor of the issue, the argument against the issue, and your proposed solution. It is your job to provide adequate coverage to all three parts.
Off-limits topics include the following: legalization of marijuana, abortion, and gay marriage.
Possible topics include: the death penalty in Southern states (a possibly innocent man named Troy Davis was executed in Georgia a few years ago; this might make for an interesting way to focus your
Spring 2014
Chisum
Rogerian Argument, 15% of final grade, 1300 words
Having analyzed a visual argument, a written argument, and your own writing processes, you will now be asked to present two opposing views on the same social justice issue, and, in whatever way possible, propose a solution that would please both parties.
Rough Draft (3 printed copies) Due: 3/18
Final Draft Due: 3/20 by the beginning of class via Turnitin
The Assignment: Using at least three sources, craft a Rogerian Argument focusing on a social justice issue of your choosing. Other than the off-limits topics, you are free to select whatever issue interests you, or in which you have emotional investment. Remember that, as a Rogerian Argument, you must objectively present both sides of the issue. That is, if your issue is the death penalty, you must present the arguments both in favor of and against the death penalty in the United States. Then, after having objectively summarized the main points of both positions, you must argue a possible solution or compromise that would, as much is possible, satisfy both parties, explaining why this solution or compromise would be acceptable to both parties.
Notes:
-Try to be as objective as possible. Think of yourself as a mediator between two warring groups. It is your job to hear out both sides, and to help them come to a compromise. Therefore, in order to do so, you must put aside your own personal reactions to the issue.
-Think of your paper as comprised of three parts: the argument in favor of the issue, the argument against the issue, and your proposed solution. It is your job to provide adequate coverage to all three parts.
Off-limits topics include the following: legalization of marijuana, abortion, and gay marriage.
Possible topics include: the death penalty in Southern states (a possibly innocent man named Troy Davis was executed in Georgia a few years ago; this might make for an interesting way to focus your