Preview

Roffey Brothers & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roffey Brothers & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
Williams v Roffey Brothers & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd is a fundamental contract law case concerning the legal issue of consideration, in relation to the performance of an existing duty. The claimant, Lester Williams successfully sued the defendant, Roffey Brothers for breach of contract in the Queens Bench Division of the High Court. The defendants appealed to the Court of Appeal where the judges were Glidewell, Russell and Purchas LJ.

Roffey Brothers Ltd was a building firm contracted to renovate a block of 27 flats and sub-contracted Williams to carry out the carpentry work for a price of £20,000. After receiving the majority of the payment but only completing a fraction of the flats, Williams realised he was in financial difficulties

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Ralph Gough was under a preexisting duty to construct the trusses for the Kinney shoe store. The general contractor, Chuckrow, was never obligated to pay for the re-erection of those trusses no matter who’s fault if they fell according to the original agreement. Mr. Gough 's preexisting duty cannot operate as consideration or change Chuckrow 's offer to pay. Therefore the contract was not modified, and Chuckrow is obligated only for the original contract price. Hence Mr. Gough cannot recover the funds. (Robert Chuckrow Construction Company v. Gough, 1968)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dawson Lumber Company

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Dawson Lumber Company was founded in the 1870s by the Dawson family to market the lumber on their land. In 1950, Dawson Lumber owned four small lumber yards in the Corn…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    National Bank of Canada ("NBC" or "the Bank") is tasked with the decision to review Dawson Lumber Company Limited 's ("Dawson") request for an increase in its line of credit up to the amount of $10.8mm. Dawson intends to finance inventory and receivables with the line of credit. NBC must remain cognizant of the competitive landscape of the lumber industry and assess whether a focus on the retail segment is beneficial to Dawson 's strategic plan. Given that Dawson is one of the region 's largest borrowers, NBC must be careful in how it manages this relationship. The Bank cannot afford to turn away NBC 's business. However, extending Dawson additional credit may increase Dawson 's default risk and jeopardize the potential for NBC to retrieve the $4.2mm term loan it is already owed.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Usyd Claw1001 Paper

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    'Appellants were employed by the respondent as baggage handler at Sydney Airport, they were dismissed from their employment' for stealing funds. 'Appellants sought an order for imposition of penalty and payment of penalty to them.' Trial judge found out respondents in 'terminating the appellants’ employment was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable and dismissed the claims.' 'The Full Court held that it was contrary however appellants were still not entitled to damages for breach of contract.'…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Riordan Manufacturing is a global plastics manufacturer that employs 550 people. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Riordan Manufacturing Industries which has earnings of more than $1 billion. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California, and has facilities worldwide.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study 1- Question 1: “What legal principles are involved in this case? How do they apply? Does James have a strong case? Why or why not?”…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Barling, E., Kelloway, K., Frone, M.R. (2005). Handbook of Work Stress. New York: Sage Publications.…

    • 3579 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An article co-authored by Eastgate, Davidson and McPhail (2014) explores whether the reporting timeframe between radiographically acquired images and radiological reports of traumatic ankle injuries meets the four-hour timeframe that patients stay in emergency departments. This recent study holds present-day applicability, as delays in producing radiological reports jeopardises the success of patient diagnoses and outcomes.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Memo

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After reading the scenario between Ms. Woodside and Doyle Contractors the following are the conclusions I have come to.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Unconscionability

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [ 6 ]. Cobbe v Yeoman 's Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 1752 Lord Walker 92…

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exclusion Clause

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages

    3. J W Carter & D J Harland. Contract Law in Australia, 4th Edition, 2002 [273-274]…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harding Plastic Company

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The objective of this case is to explore the ranking differences that may result from using the PI, NPV, and IRR evaluation techniques. It illustrates the time disparity, size disparity, and life disparity problems and the appropriate approaches to the resolution of these problems. This case works well either as a homework problem coinciding with the introduction of project ranking and capital-rationing material or as an in-class problem lecture.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equity Maxims

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * D&C Builders v Rees – Lord Denning. A small building firm did some work on the house of a couple named Rees. The bill came to £732, of which the Rees had already paid £250. When the builders asked for the balance of £482, the Rees announced that the work was defective and they were only prepared to pay £300. As the builders were in serious financial difficulties, they reluctantly accepted the £300 “ in completion of the account ”. The decision to accept the money would not normally be binding in contract law, and afterwards the builders sued the Rees for the outstanding amount. The Rees claimed that the court should apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel, which can make promises binding when they would normally not be. However, Lord Denning refused to apply the doctrine, on the grounds that the Rees had taken unfair advantage of the builders’ financial difficulties, and therefore had not come with “clean hands”.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strict Liability

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    • A person may be liable for some harm even though he is not negligent in causing the same or does not intentionally cause it or is careful or has taken steps to prevent the same.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two men own portions of a farm. The one man’s property is subject to a registered and precisely defined right-of-way servitude in favour of the other’s property. The owner of the servient tenement wished to change the route of the defined right of way at his own expense when the original route became inconvenient to him. The owner of the dominant tenement refused to consent to the change on allegedly unreasonable grounds. The servient owner brought the matter before the High Court to grant an order allowing the change. The High Court rejected the claim, so the applicant appeals to the present court.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays