Preview

Rights for Students Tcap English Iii

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rights for Students Tcap English Iii
According to the First Admendment to the Constitution, citizens have the right to their freedom of speech. Because of this right, school districts should not be allowed to force a group of students from expressing themselves and what they believe in. Students should be able to protest peacefully, whether for or against, something because it is their legal right to do so. Referring back to the article "The supreme Court on 'Hazelwood': A Reversal on Regulation of Student Expression", it was stated that, "the court upheld the right ot three Des Moines high school students to wear black armbands as a peaceful symbol of opposition to the Vietnam War".Being that the school districts tried to force students from wearing black armbands to show that they were against War in Vietnam, shows their lack of their knowledge of the constitution. The court ruled in the students favor until 1988.

If a student wants to peacefully protest against or for something they have that right to do so. Whether it be school dress code, school lunch menu's, government ways, or even anything going on in the world that surrounds us, they have that right. One should not be made to hold back their thoughts if the topic is reasonable. It is their right to speak about whatever they may choose according to the consitution. Unless a student writes something that is harmful to another student or were to cause a riot their freedom of speech should be practiced in schools. In order to monitor freedom of speech in a fair an unbiased way, if an article written by a student is questionable then the article should be submitted to a panel which should have student, parent, and administrative representation to decide if it is acceptable or not.

However, if one is being disrespectful about voicing their opinion, then authority can take the upper hand in what may need to be the outcome. Even if you have the right to freedom of speech, it does not give you the right to be disruptive or cause chaos.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case all started with a meeting at Christopher Echardt’s house to do a silent protest of the Vietnam war. The “Tinker kids” decided the wear two-inch-wide black armbands to school for the protest. Before the students could wear their armbands, the principals of the Des Moines School District found out about what they were planning and fearing that the armbands would provoke disturbances, they resolved that all students…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Tinker vs Des Moines case is a land-mark case in upholding the rights of school children, and their freedom to express their opinions and views. Many have heard of the case, while others are unaware of its existence. The real conflict however is whether the defendants, John and Mary Beth Tinker were right or wrong. In December of 1965, the Tinker siblings decided to wear black armbands with peace signs on them to protest America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. After getting suspended from school, The Tinkers brought the case to the U.S. District Court, which raised the question: Were their rights violated? The answer is obvious. The school was incorrect in their actions, and the Tinkers rights were impeded upon because they did not cause…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hudgens V Labar Case Study

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In most situations freedom of speech is protected, but when you have another acting authority with their own rules of protection, things can become convoluted and a bit complicated. In the case of Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board one such issue arose out of picketing union members who were told to leave private property while picketing. A labor dispute ensued and the case had to be decided by the Supreme Court over whether the…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before Tinker v. Des Moines the opinions students could and couldn’t voice was decided on by the schools. This changed when three students, John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker and, Christopher Eckhardt decided to voice their opinions on the Vietnam War by wearing black arm bands (“Tinker V. Des Moines”1). The School system demanded the students to take off their arm bands or they would be suspended. The students refused to take them off didn’t attend school till after their winter break (“Tinker v. Des Moines” 1). John Tinker’s father thought this was unfair that their children were singled out for wearing armbands while other students were allowed to wear other…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines five brave students decided to wear black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War. Even though they were threatened with suspension they still decided to wear them. They got suspended until they would agree to not wear the armbands but still wore all black clothes to school for the rest of in year. Students should be able to protest in schools because of the first amendment, their opinions matter just as much as adults, and while some think they should students don’t just give up their constitutional rights just because they’re at school.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does taking the right for students to wear armbands to a public school violate students’ freedom of speech protections from the First Amendment? Did the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    December 1965, a group of students met at Christopher Eckhardt's home and discussed that they wanted to show support for the truce in the vietnam war. They decided they would wear armbands to school to support it, but the principles of the Des Moines school found out about their plan. A new rule in school was passed. That all students wearing any armband would be asked to remove it, and if they refused, they would be suspended. On the 16th of December, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt both wore armbands to school, were asked to remove the armbands, and when they refused, they were send home. The next day, John Tinker had the same situation and and resulted the same way. In response to the suspension, the students sued the school district…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. In favor of the Tinker children, it could be argued that of course since they were American citizens attending an American school, they are entitled to their rights to the same extent that a non-minor not in school is. Because it has been ruled the picketing, a form of protest, is a form of symbolic speech, and wearing these black armbands is also a form of protest, that it should be protected under the First Amendment as well. This is compounded by the Fourteenth Amendment, which extends Freedom of Speech to governments, such as school systems.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of this court case was to determine whether or not wearing armbands in an educational setting is protected under Freedom of Speech. Justice Abe Fortas was against the prohibiting of armbands in school because it was protected by the First Amendment. However, Justice Hugo Black was for the prohibiting of armbands because he did not believe that people could express their opinions or beliefs anywhere or any time.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My thesis statement is grounded on the ideas of the SROTL Resolution, Garrard McClendon, and Ruthellen Crews. The authors of “Students’ Rights to Their Own Language” argue that students should be able to speak and write in their native language because it is more suitable for them and it is easier for them to identify who they are. In addition, they argued that saying the “dialect of one student being unacceptable is like saying that one group is better than the other” (SRTOL Resolution). I agree that as students we should be able to write in our native language because it defines who we are, however, I believe that we should only write in our native language during our years in elementary and high school. What I learned from personal experiences with the English language is that my teachers during elementary and high school never focused on my oral and written skills. Any written assignments during my four years in high school I was never told that my writing was not…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Schools should encourage students to keep their dialects throughout the school development because it gives them a better sense of belonging and acceptance within their peers. It is crucial for students to feel accepted while learning because their skills can be the main focus in schools rather than trying to change their dialects to meet standards. As for writing, it should e rather similar because it would not be in the favor for every single teacher or professor to go out and learn as many dialects as they can, just to make a few students feel like they belong. As I have previously mentioned, the feeling like one fits in an environment can make the difference in their education and how well or not they learn. The dialects that teachers should focus on getting used to are the most common ones. These include, but not limited to Spanish, Chinese, and French. More problems have to be addressed when exposing teachers to more languages. These include the different dialect within those languages, and of course it will be too much to…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To illustrate, according to Des Moines Independent School District that took place in 1969, “John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt wore black armbands to school in Des Moines, Iowa, to protest the war in Vietnam. School officials told them to remove the armbands, and when they refused they were suspended… The Supreme Court sided with the students. Students and teachers don’t ‘shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,’” (Jacobs). This proves how the right to protest is at risk in our society because the students were simply protesting the war in Vietnam peacefully, but the school said they couldn’t when they were allowed to do so. Also, the right to protest is at risk, according to Edwards v. South Carolina, “petitioners, all of whom were black, organized a march to the South Carolina State House grounds… The march was peaceful, did not block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, and was conducted in an orderly fashion on public property; a group of approximately thirty police officers confronted the group and ordered its members to disperse or to submit to arrest… The Court held that the arrests and convictions violated the rights of the marchers” (Oyez). This shows how the right to protest is at risk in our society because as stated above, the protesters held a peaceful protest, which was completely legal, but were arrested for no reason which violated their rights to…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays