Preview

Rhetorical Analysis On Molly Ivins

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
130 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis On Molly Ivins
Rhetorical Precis; Molly Ivins
Columnist, Molly Ivins with the Fort Worth Star-Telegram writes in her (March 15, 1993) “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation with Guns” article about the hypocrisy of gun ownership in our nation and emphasizes the unnecessary possession of guns by providing alternatives to guns. Ivins supports her claim by first using sarcasm by mocking the circumstances her points apply to; second she argues that guns in fact are to kill and nothing else and finally, society is NOT trained, disciplined militias thus cannot handle guns. Molly Ivins’ Op Ed is to persuade the Texas based readers and the entire nation that guns do not protect, guns kill. Ivins emphasizes a candid and demanding tone to stress the absurdity of the lack

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The civil libertarian writer, Molly Ivins, in her Op-Ed argument, “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns” published in 1993 addresses the topic of making United states a gun free country in accordance of the United States Second Amendment to prevent any more unnecessary harm to the Millennium class. Ivins supports her claim by using a homespun diction, analogy imagery, colloquial style and loose, cumulative sentence syntax to create a restatement effect. Examples from the text include a goodwill attitude toward the subject. By setting herself as a civil libertarian it gives the audience a sense of commonly known ground. Ivins tries to make herself seem equal to her audience by also using homespun language to make her audience relate to…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Naomi Schaefer Riley use many effective rhetorical devices to strengthen her argument, she gets a little off topic towards the end of her article. The end of her essay lack the effective use of ethos and other rhetorical devices to keep the reader on track. The author keep coming back to Thiel’s idea which confuses the reader of her position in this argument. For example, she says, “so does Thiel’s offer suggest that a university diploma might be most useful lining a birdcage?” (10). By keep going back to Thiel’s plan for the students the article seems unprofessional and messy. It looks disorganized and takes away the intelligent tone she has established until this far in the article. By this unnecessary repetition the reader might…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, Deborah Tannen balanced all three rhetorical appeals effectively to convince her audience. The author mostly used logos in her essay to back up her points. It was effective because she showed information and facts and demonstrated the audience could trust her. Tannen establishes credibility of her sources in her article by referencing facts, quotes, and people.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the argumentative essay “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get rid of Guns,” Molly Ivins…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Huffington Post’s Carol Morgan says, “If they have to be chased, then they don't want you!” Carol Morgan honestly states this best, I hate to be harsh but you do not need to waste your time on someone who does not have an interest in you. Time is precious and you could use your time getting to love…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Florence Kelley conveys her message on the importance of women as voters. She does this by first using details and repetition to shine light on the problems and the harsh realities of child labor, and then offering the right to ballot in women's hands as a solution.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recognizing that the opponent’s view may be right in certain circumstances is a key thing when arguing under the Rogerian method, as it shows that both sides can be reasoned with. Jane Willy does this when she acknowledges that these nicknames and mascots hold a potential harm. She admits that there is “considerable merit to the argument that some names can be hurtful,” and if came to a consensus of their damage, they should be eliminated just as U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has requested (Willy, 2008). The author states that she believes anyone that feels offended by the names should be listened to. She also believes that foreigners should not decide for them that “they shouldn’t be offended, and that they are too thin-skinned, too eager…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author included numerous rhetorical strategies to reinforce his rather shocking stance that Americans love their guns and that those guns are here to stay. The authors use of visual descriptions, incidents, and statistics were all appropriate examples used to establish and display the ideas effectively. The composition of the article flows really well, a lot of information is presented but also condensed, mentioning only what is vital to the argument. The author is direct and to the point and the author does not deviate from the main argument, constantly coming back and endorsing his/her opinion. The author mentions, “many Americans have already come to the remarkable conclusion that the best route to a safer America is a better-armed America,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). The author is constantly on point with his/her information. These statements are so stark and bold; they definitely resonate with the audience. An abundance of research and emotionally charged writing made this article a solid and convincing piece for…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ramblings of Gopnik

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article written by Adam Gopnik entitled “Shootings,” he speaks about troublesome shootings, gun problems, and social issues in the United States compared to other nations. He believes that gun laws should be more restrictive, and that there is no reason a private citizen in the United States should be able to own a handgun. His argument is invalid; there are many reasons that someone would and has the right to own a gun. Gopnik rambles throughout the essay and does not provide enough support or structure to have a convincing thesis. He barely made a point.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In her essay “Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed,” Nan Desuka brings for the issue whether handguns should be outlawed except to police and other service units. I disagree with Desuka’s position on banning handguns. This essay offers arguments why they should be banned without offering realistic solutions to the problems Desuka states in owning handguns. Retaining legalized handguns affects all of us. It’s essential to Collectors and sportsmen, and vital to all our safety. I do not believe that banning handguns will overall decrease violent crimes or the deaths due to violent crimes.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    America is widely known for having a fascination with violence and is a “gun – happy” country. However, this love for firearms has led to tragedies untold and horrifying truths about the mental state of individuals as revealed in the Columbine School shooting incident. Major and minor causes collectively led up to this event and bring up the question of whether or not this tragedy could have been prevented. The NRA play a key part in the debate over gun control, and parents play a vital role in instilling future generations with respect for handguns and being involved in their lives. Though there is room to consider a grey area guns continue to be the instruments used to sow sorrow resulting…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Outline

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thesis Statement – There is no doubt that this world would be a safer place without a license to carry, but we need to consider that guns are needed to hunt.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anything could be used as a weapon to hurt or kill someone. Criminals could create weapons from things found in local stores such as Home Depot, Lowes, or any other hardware store. By making weapons instead of purchasing, no one knows if he or she is creating a weapon or just using the tools for its intended purpose. People also buy chemicals off the internet to create bombs that can kill numerous amounts of people. Even by making guns illegal for citizens, this law won’t change a thing for criminals that make weapons to kill people. By taking away our rights to bear arms citizens are left with less protection. Guns aren’t the reason people are killed, it’s the criminals that use them. “You can’t blame the gun any more than you blame the car after a fatal accident… you punish the individuals.”(Sepcoski 2).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays