Preview

Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Descartes' Meditation 5

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1539 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Descartes' Meditation 5
Jerry Brow
Grindeland
7/16/2012
Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Meditation 5 Now that I have had a chance to review my original essay, I’ve determined that my arguments for Descartes’ logic being circular were unclear because I believed something different from what I believe now. Though this revision will still address the same concepts from the Meditations as my previous essay, I will argue instead that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is not guilty of circular logic but merely has the illusion of such. Descartes’ belief system for the existence of God consists of claims that seem to presuppose one another in defending their conclusions of each other, but instead, each follow from the Cogito as first principles. Other than the Cogito stating ‘so long as I continue to think I am something,’ which was determined to be a first principle in the First Meditations, another self-evident truth arises in the beginning of the Third Meditation that is a crucial antecedent for Descartes’ belief system regarding the existence of God. This first principle explicitly states that everything Descartes’ thinking being clearly and distinctly perceives is true. A few other important claims are made in the Third Mediation that are especially relevant to the Fifth Mediations, such as the claim that ideas considered alone in their own right cannot be outwardly false. Accounting for intuitive error, Descartes elaborates that even though ideas might have proceeded from things outside him, it does not follow that these ideas must resemble those outside things. An idea for a substance however, or something that exists in itself, has a greater objective reality than ideas without a substance, because it is more clear and distinct. It is from this foundation that Descartes’ idea of God is defined as, “a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful.” When Descartes begins to acknowledge things outside of him, his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In the First Meditation, Descartes gives us the Evil Demon Hypothesis which serves to give him reason to doubt the existence of everything he perceives and believes. He describes a ‘malicious demon of the utmost power and cunning’ that has the sole purpose of deceiving Descartes (Descartes, 2010: 17). I will argue that his hypothesis has proven to be a strong one because only the cogito provides a way for us to frustrate or trick the evil demon.…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next stage in the meditations is to establish the existence of God. In the third meditation, Descartes first introduces two forms of reality: formal and objective as his foundation for his rationale. The formal reality of anything is the actual existence and the degree of its perfection as a mode of mind whether the idea is of a finite or infinite substance whereas the objective reality of an idea is its inherent degree of perfection, considered now with regard to its content. With this connection, Descartes explains that the idea of God is the idea of a perfect or Supreme Being, which lies on the highest degree of reality because God’s formal and objective reality is infinite. Descartes emphasizes that an object cannot create something with more reality than the creator. Due to his idea of God is someone…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fifth meditation starts off by Descartes straying away from meditating on the aspects of himself and God and compelling himself to focus on what he was pondering on a few days ago: material things. But before Descartes tries to reason if material things outside himself exist, he must first make sure material things can be definite outside his thoughts without being subjected to doubtfulness. Other than that, anything outside these parameters has to be omitted and seen as distractions from what he is trying to ponder on. He has to understand the difference between the material things that are definite and the material things that are ambiguous or bring about doubt and being deceived through the senses. Descartes first has to audit his…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why is God so important to Descartes’ philosophical project in the Meditations? Answer with reference to Descartes’ attempts to prove the existence of God in Meditation 3.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes establishes that in order to know what in fact exists, one must first take everything off the table and then see what can be put back. The conclusion is that in order to be certain that one is a thinking thing; one must know what it takes to be certain. “All those things I perceive very clearly and very distinctly are true”(Pg. 53). This general rule however, requires that all doubt must be removed. This can only be done if God both exists and is not a deceiver. Descartes then breaks substances down into those that have objective reality and those with formal reality. It is clear that the idea of God must have more objective reality than formal reality. However, the idea itself is so great that Descartes believes that he could not have come up with it by himself. Since he himself is a finite substance, it is assumed that something infinite would be the only thing that could envision the idea of the infinite in the first place. Therefore, God must exist and cannot be a deceiver because he would not allow Descartes to not be able to clearly and distinctly perceive. This argument then rests on Descartes proof of the existence of God, which can only be erroneous if Descartes clarity and distinctness rule is incorrect. Since the argument of God is used for the validation of the clarity and distinctness rule, and the rule itself implicitly must prove that God exists, the Cartesian circle is created. For an argument to be circular, one of the premises must be reliant upon the conclusion for its truth. If you touch on one argument, you touch on both. There are a few ways out of the circle.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the beginning of the third meditation, Descartes seeks to establish the existence of God using his initial concept of self awareness. Descartes argued that because he thought, then he lived. Thinking ability at this time was linked to being alive and thought that there must be a god who puts the thoughts in his mind. In his quest for indubitable truth, Descartes came up with the theory of ideas, which classified those things that he considered distinct and clear to be true. Descartes argued that the idea of god should be coming from within him since he cannot experience god himself directly or find any perfection in himself.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cartesian Circle

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes’ “Cartesian Circle” has come under fire from countless philosophers because it supposedly commits a logical fallacy with its circular reasoning. In his second Meditation, Descartes attempts to prove the existence of God. He states that clear and distinct perception leads to knowledge, and that God’s existence is apparent and obvious because of things we have come to perceive as knowledge. Furthermore, he asserts that we cannot turn these perceptions into knowledge without the assurance that God exists. Essentially, Descartes claims that God is a necessary condition for knowledge, which in turn requires the existence of God. This circular logic presents a problematic scenario similar to the “chicken or the egg?” debate and has left philosophers pondering its legitimacy for decades.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Belief in God

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his groundbreaking work, Meditations on First Philosophy, the French philosopher Rene Descartes lays the groundwork for many philosophical principles by attempting to “establish a bold and lasting knowledge” (171)1. The foundations for knowledge Descartes established would go on to influence a plethora of other philosophers and philosophical works. Descartes argues in his meditations first from the point of view of complete skepticism, using skepticism as a tool in order to discover what is real. Through this method, Descartes explains the existence of man as a “thinking thing,” the capacity for human error, the overall trustworthiness of our senses, the existence of a physical world, the mind and body as separate entities, and the existence of an infinitely perfect God. Descartes uses a variety of premises to help back up his idea of a prefect God. The main idea concluded from these premises is that man alone could not have come up with the idea of infinite perfection, so the idea of God comes from God himself, thus proving his existence. Although his argument for the existence of God is the least strong of his philosophical arguments, I agree with Descartes because humans alone could not grasp the idea of infinity or an infinitely perfect being. I intend examine and defend Descartes’ explanation of the existence of God, propose valid counter-arguments and my own answers to those objections.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ philosophy begins in doubt. The first step towards certainty, the Archimedean point from which the whole structure will grow, is the discovery of the existence of the self. At the beginning of Meditation II, reflecting on the evil genius posited at the end of Meditation I, Descartes observes: ‘Let him deceive me as much as he can, he will never bring it about that I am nothing so long as I think that I am something… I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind’. In the earlier Discourse (Part IV) and the later Principles of Philosophy (Part I §7 ), this proposition has the more familiar form, ‘I am thinking, therefore I exist,’ or, ‘ego cogito, ergo sum,’ in its Latin formulation. Here, it is called the Cogito Argument.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first of Rene Descartes six Meditations is concerned with the possibility that our immediate perceptions of the external physical world that we either ignorantly or correctly call reality, may all in fact be a dream. Is the external world we believe to be our waking reality different to a reality we are programmed to be unable to perceive? Is it merely an intelligent deception of some sort, orchestrated by a cunning evil demon? This essay will attempt to question our capacity (or lack thereof) of perception within a hypothetic “real world” by examining objections of the sceptic in order to discover the possibility of an objective reality with reference to arguments set out in Descartes’ Meditations. By the external physical world, I mean a world compiled of objects and events which we can only experience through our sense organs, forming the subconscious intelligence of sense perception, that which is impartial of the mind. We don’t seem to engage directly with the external world but rather subconsciously piece together a rational system of patterns from our experiences gained through our senses to develop our own individual concepts of the matter we come across as we grow up. These intangible concepts constitute our knowledge of the external world and allow us to build foundations for further experience. From this foundation, we begin to create a mental display of rationalised relationships between ourselves and other objects (along with inter-object relationships) through what we, again, perceive through our senses. But on what grounds is our knowledge of this external physical world substantiated? This is precisely the question Descartes presents us with and simultaneously tries to dismantle.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will be examining René Descartes’ reasons for doubting all of his beliefs. I will begin with Descartes’ first meditation, showing how he argues his reasons of doubt. Followed with Descartes’ second meditation, presenting the one piece of knowledge that Descartes finds irrefutable and explaining why he believes it to be so.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes vs Nietzsche

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moreover, according to Rene Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy states “I think, therefore I am”. Descartes believed that finding one indubitable truth, together with a means for employing it, will be the foundation of a true philosophical system. Descartes' argument was that whatever doubt I may have, I cannot doubt that I am doubting - that I exist as doubting and, in general, thinking, and even an evil genius cannot trick me into thinking that I am doubting. Descartes defined the human mind as existing because it can think, and distinguished that the mind and the body are separate entities.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes, in his third Meditation, conveys a powerful argument regarding the existence of God. The first concept that he outlines is that since every idea must be caused, and if he has an idea that he isn’t the cause of, then something other than him must exist. The next step of Descartes’s argument states that all ideas of material reality could have only originated within him, but the idea of God, a perpetual and flawless being could not have originated from Descartes since he himself isn’t perpetual and flawless like God. Furthermore, he goes on to state that the idea of God, could indeed only have spurred by God and not a human and therefore god exists. These points are the basis of Descartes’s argument that God indeed does exist.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays