Preview

Representation Of Truth In Geoffrey Robertson's 'The Justice Game'

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Representation Of Truth In Geoffrey Robertson's 'The Justice Game'
• How does the prosecution and defense each represent the truth?
• Values and attitudes of the participants?
• Robertson’s values and representation of the truth?

Truth can be represented in differing ways according to the values and attitudes of the persona whose representation of truth is being expressed. Throughout Geoffrey Robertson’s The Justice Game the responder is convinced to accept the composer’s representation of truth through the use of composing techniques such as the short story structure, Robertson’s social status, various language techniques, symbolism and the use of examples and quotations to back up Robertson’s statements. The perspective on truth held by the other participants in each trial is however also included. The term ‘truth’ refers to accurately placing information in accordance with fact or reality. The ‘truth’ in The Justice Game is essentially about revealing to its readers “What is kept from the public, and what the public wish to be kept from”. Each case was chosen by Robertson to provide different representations of the ‘truth’ based on different values and attitudes.
…show more content…
Through the eyes of Robertson people have the opportunity to see the ‘truth’ in these highly publicised cases from the perspective of a learned and involved man. Robertson is assumed to be a reliable source of truth by the average reader, because he is a celebrated lawyer and has been chosen to represent people as high profiled as the “Princess of Wales”. The genre and format of the text represent certain qualities to the reader, along with the social status of Robertson which in turn, act to convince them that what is written is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 2 Journal

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was interesting to think how dangerous having truth commissions were since the people being tried still had connections to their superiors. The article explained how in certain situations, the truth commotions were forced to be private, in order to keep those associated with the trial…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am writing to bring to your attention the unfair trial of Tom Robinson. I think we all knew that the jury would say that he was guilty of the crime, but was he really? I don’t think he was, and I hope you and the readers of The Maycomb Tribune will help me fight this injustice. Good people like Atticus Finch, tried to prove the innocence of Tom Robinson. The real criminals here are Mayella Ewell and Bob Ewell for taking a man’s life simply because he was colored. Remember it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “Enemies” and “Friends” Tim O’brien explores the idea of justice in two ways; Jensen’s attack on Shrunk and Jensen’s relief at Shrunk’s death.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate. Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.” Only one juror votes “not guilty.” That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty.”…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had all heard the same case, but due to the vast differences in their personal lives, they had all come to different conclusions. With two very strong willed and different individuals arguing, I found it surprising that they had managed to reach a point in which they decided a compromise was best. The idea of compromise, however, brought something completely different into account, the relationship of law and justice. The distinction between the two is very interesting, what really draws the line between the two? Does justice appeal more to emotion and law more to logistics? If that’s the case then how can someone reasonably mix the two in order to get a fair punishment if one is…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jasper Jones Quotes

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘The world of Jasper Jones is a frightening on where it is difficult to find your place.’ Discuss.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sam Sheppard

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The stories written through the duration of the murder case were one of the main things that were detrimental to Sheppard’s case. The jury’s view of Sheppard was adversely affected by the news stories such as the most famous one of all: “Somebody Is Getting Away With Murder”. They printed biased stories…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History had left many with wrongful convictions, while no one can be certain of a person's innocents, looking back it appears as if many trials were conducted poorly, and that the convictions of were based on unreliable and unbelievable circumstantial evidence. Now, only in hindsight, is it seen the errors made initially, and the failure of justice caused hysteria. Never is this more evident then in Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible, and Edna St. Vincent poem, Justice Denied in Massachusetts.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter four in Sandel’s book “Justice” talks about markets and morals. In this chapter we consider the morality of paying people to perform different types of work such as fighting wars and bearing children. The question that stands is whether there should be a market, when money is involved, to the aspect of morality. One good example that Sandel portrays in this chapter is “Pregnancy for Pay.” Thinking through the rights and wrongs in this example helps clarify the differences among leading theories of justice.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of conflicting perspectives in society is inevitable as there are an infinite amount of truths that are developed by an individual’s understanding of an idea. It is important to note that truth is constructed, not found and is entirely subjective as different perceptions of truth are influenced by culture, religion, lifestyle, interest and the sort. Geoffrey Robertson’s nonfiction text, The Justice Game and David Braithwaite’s feature article “Chaser Comic Convoy beats summit security” highlights the expected conflicts in perspectives through the issues of corruption of the law and obscenity accompanied by the overarching theme of “truths”. They explore the manipulation of how truths can mislead and warp meaning, thus creating perspectives that generate diverse and provocative insights.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of plea bargains to resolve criminal court cases often places in jeopardy the constitutional rights of defendants. The pressure to admit guilt for the purpose of being released versus opting for a jury trial is the primary reason this form of justice is utilized. Additional reasons for plea bargaining agreements are: the overcrowding of courts, if pleas were not allowed, courts would be overwhelmed and forcibly closed. The caseload of prosecutors', with fewer trials, prosecutors’ can more effectively indict and focus on the most serious cases, and plea bargains save defendants money by not having to adequately defend themselves at trial. Although, plea bargains are critical to the judiciary process, the plea bargains presented in the film, triggered severe ethical dilemmas and ultimately postured the defendants for a lifetime…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diana in the Docks

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robertson describes this case through the use of a paradox in the opening paragraph "Diana had been the victim of a dirty trick which provided windfall profits to underserving people" these undeserving people being 'Bryce Taylor' and the mirror magazine. Diana's perspective is that her privacy was breached for common greed of monetary benefits by that of Bryce Taylor.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Justice Game

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I'd like to start by defining absolute truth. Absolute truth is something that is true regardless of the context. My definition itself being different to that of esras proves truth is relative to circumstances. Our 'truth' today depends on the side of the debate we are on. The link here is the fact that we use our language as a tool against truth, and this language is filled with kludges that block the existence of absolute truth. Geoffrey Robertson does the same when writing, adding his perspective To the prisoner of Venda. The justice game, being a non-fiction book, automatically causes us to see the content as truth. Robertson uses this medium to position himself on a level of superiority where he tells us, the readers, his perspective in such a way that we see it as a fact. This links to Robertsons context as a lawyer, as a lawyers purpose is to show a representation of truth that will defend someone, rather than an absolute truth. If there was an absolute truth there'd be no need for lawyers. Robertsons value of human rights causes his perspective to conflict with the perspective of the ruling white class at the time. His tone towards Robert ratshitanga is admirable. In the opening lines of the chapter he refers to ratshitanga as the most courageous man I ever met. This is because to Robertson, Robert ratshitanga was an innocent man with great dignity. From the perspective of the south African apartheid group ratshitanga was a criminal. The difference in tone used by the judge and the tone used by Robertson shows that although personal truth does exist, absolute truth is restricted by the term 'absolute'. He uses hyperbole when referring to him as the epitome of courage.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gentlemen, Your Verdict

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An example of allusion in this story would be Torpedoman Preece recalling the events on the submarine.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Justice is served” is the cliché line heard in courtrooms throughout the world of fantasy. What justice is proves to be more difficult to define. Many definitions state it as an action that is the result or punishment for a negative action. The trouble lies in what defines what is just, the law, society or morality. Plato’s use of Socrates in “Crito” argues that justice is defined as the laws of a city or state as well as what a person’s own perception of justice is. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Molière’s play Tartuffe argues that justice is both a moral concept as well as a way of reprimanding wrongdoing by a higher political power. Antigone is Sophocles’ description of justice which lies in the social repercussions for those who break the laws…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays