Renaissance painters such as Leonardo Da Vinci, Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni and Tintoretto were a defined as the High Renaissance artist in their age. Although they were all artist of the same phase but they decided to express art in different ways, in order to bring back the art work of Rome into their Glorious age. Leonardo Da Vinci focuses more on scientific researches and a broad variety of art works such as painting, sculptures and architecture. While Michelangelo focuses more sculpture, with his sculpture ‘David’ he successfully pushes the limit of sculpture into the highest point by the time. Tintoretto still remained his effort on paintings as he painted another version of ‘The Last Supper’, changes in the renaissance art was distinct compared to the work of Da Vinci. Michelangelo’s ‘The Last Judgment’ shows similarity between Da Vinci’s ‘The Last Supper’ they both may be trying to express common idea to its viewer, However ‘The Last Supper’ painted by Tintoretto may have great difference with the one that Da Vinci Painted.
The painting ‘The last Judgment’ by Michelangelo might have shown the similar topic as the ‘The Last Supper’ by Da Vinci. Both of the paintings were painted on walls and are both huge in size. Firstly, it would be the technique on how the paintings were painted, as Da Vinci’s defined the Golden Ratio, based on pictures of his painting ‘The Last Supper’, it has implemented some signs of symmetry. Jesus Christ seats right in the middle of table as the people who surround the table are seated equally spreading beside Jesus Christ. The sign of symmetry might also be implemented in Michelangelo’s ‘The Last Judgment”. According to pictures of the painting, as Jesus Christ also stands in the middle of painting, Angels and Saints surrounds him in a very equal phase, The heaven shown on the top of the painting were divided into two, this may have indicate the sign of symmetry also. The sign of Symmetry may be represent the idea of fairness to the people, like a scale which both sides are balanced. Fair judgment can interpreted in both art works.
Secondly, the plot and relationship between these two paintings may have some sort contact with each other. ‘The Last Supper’ shows the last meal that Jesus Christ had before he got betrayed and executed. These could represent the early life of Jesus as being a normal man. While ‘The Last Judgment’ however, shows Jesus as a man with power and authority to judge a person. Based on the website about “Michelangelo's Last Judgment: The Response” it was written that “Its theological message may in fact be clearer than the Brazen Serpent’s. Christ as judge condemns those on his left to eternal fire, as he raises those on his right to heaven to join in the company of the angels and saints, including of course the Blessed Virgin Mary. ” Since he was in the middle of the painting it may symbolize him as an important figure in heaven. From a normal person to a person who has power and authority, both paintings may relate the normal and afterlife of Jesus Christ. This event is similar to a pupa who is struggling to break out and be a butterfly. Before being executed and betrayed, this process is like the struggle of the pupa breaking out of his shell. Jesus Christ in ‘The Last Judgment’ being the butterfly who has struggle out of pain and obtaining the power he should deserve.
Finally, the Nudity that occurs in the painting ‘The last Judgment’ had controversy with the public against the disgrace of the painting toward Christianity. According to Nathan Zawie on his website about “Michelangelo's Last Judgment: The Response” it stated that “According to Aretino, Michelangelo was a Christian who, ‘because he rates art higher than faith, deems a royal spectacle of martyrs and virgins in improper attitudes, men dragged down by their genitals, things in front of which brothels would shut their eyes in order not to see them’”. It may seem like Michelangelo was...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document