Preview

Recollection In Meno

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Recollection In Meno
Charles Miller
Philosophy Introduction to Knowledge
Prof. Polger
23 February 2015
Paper #1 In Meno, Plato believed that learning is recollection, as previously voiced by Socrates. Plato also believed that this argument was valid argument that because perception can deceive us, it can be wrong, so our knowledge must come from recollection. Setting this up as a deductive argument is simple. Stated by the IEP (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) “A deductive argument is an argument that is intended by the arguer to be (deductively) valid, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion provided that the argument 's premises (assumptions) are true.” So according to Plato’s believes that knowledge is recollection we can set up
…show more content…
He uses the example of the cave and how ones reality is shaped by perception but their knowledge is based on recollection. In the cave allegory the man is tied up and only sees puppets of real things but the things he is seeing are not the real things. They are just forms of the objects that are someplace else, Plato calls this “the realm of the forms” and he also says, “We do not learn, and that what we call learning is only a process of recollection.” (Plato). This implies that we don’t in fact learn anything true at all because the forms are somewhere else. But what we can do is recall information taught to us and because perception can lead us to false truths we get to this information by remembering rather than looking at it. Going back to the cave allegory Plato gives the example if the man escaped the cave his reality would be crushed because he could only recall on the images he saw in the cave of these real things. It just wouldn’t be right to him even though outside the cave is where the real things are. Whether this is just a comment on society and telling us that we are stuck in the cave and not able to find true knowledge or it is just a reinforcement on his theory that knowledge is recollection this story has a lot of flaws in the story and his ideas of what knowledge …show more content…
Like where is the Realm of the forms and how do I gain true knowledge if all I see is false things. If we know what we know then what we know is true. Each person doesn’t think the same so no one’s reality is the same which means that there is no one true reality. We are all different and have different minds and things we can perceive to be true. But if someone doesn’t believe your view then does that mean it is false. Absolutely not, it is true to you so each person’s truths and morals are different therefore the way we come to these truths are all unique. Plato didn’t believe this, he implied in the Meno that all of our truths are false and there is no way to get to absolute truth but through our own truths we can get a generalization of what things are. “One ever feels twoness, an American, a Negro, two souls, two thoughts” (W.E.B. Du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk). Many other great minds back then have since disproven Plato but to give the man some credit, he was a brilliant mind that had a lot of tremendous ideas about the way we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato’s philosophical beliefs by the Allegory of the Cave represents how people view the world by what they see and hear and that we are blinded because of it. The cave itself represents how we are all trapped from the real knowledge that we are too blinded to see. The shadows in the cave are supposed to be what we think is true and that they’re really just shadows of the truth. The prisoner leaving the cave represents the people who actually try to go out and seek knowledge and the sun is representing the truth in life. The prisoner returning to the cave represents how most people are too scared to except the philosophical truth and are actually scared of…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is an observable and present relationship between truth and storytelling. For Plato, this can be seen in Meno. In this story, Plato is having a conversation with Meno about learning, and Meno declares that learning is impossible (find the actual quote). However, Plato counters Meno’s argument with the Theory of Recollection. In this theory, the soul is immortal, knows everything, and when you are born your soul is burdened by a clumsy body that forgets everything. However, when you learn something, you are just remembering what you (your soul) forgot. For example: you have never seen a triangle. Such a bold declaration is also a defining part of the theory. In order for a triangle to exist, it has to have lines to create it, but the second…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's understanding of knowledge is justified true belief. After rejecting 2 accounts of knowledge (knowledge as perception & knowledge as true belief) , defined as KNOWLEDGE IS SOMETHING SIMILAR TO JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF. (PG. 20)…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Initially, I would say that Plato’s Allegory of the Cave doesn’t tell us anything about reality, and by doing so I would have to agree with the statement. My reasoning for this is straightforward and simple, Plato implies that the senses are completely useless, and by doing so he also implies that empiricist ways are also useless for they rely solely upon the senses. This shows to us that the Plato’s allegory cannot tell us anything about reality as we have survived for millions of years by using empiricist techniques, or more specifically the senses. It would simply be impossible for us to live without them. These senses are sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch, and Plato claims that in order to understand reality we mustn’t use them, instead relying on rationalist techniques like logic and reason, this, in some circumstances couldn’t tell us a thing about reality. An example of this would be that we cannot gain all of our knowledge through thinking alone. For example, I could think of a fruit like an apple or banana and I could think of what it would possibly taste like, however, you wouldn’t be able to imagine the taste, this simply isn’t possible. We couldn’t just think that bananas or apples taste delicious because we don’t actually know how they would taste without actually eating it, and if we were to do this we would have to rely on the sense of taste, an empiricist sense, this clearly shows how the Analogy of the Cave cannot possibly tell us anything about reality as humanity relies on empiricism for the most basic of tasks as my example above clearly shows.…

    • 591 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the freed prisoner is returned, he attempts to convince the others of what he saw, and Plato backs out when they refuse to listen, so that he may tie it in to his own example, as though he has found the only higher truth. By virtue of his setup, there can be no arguing as to the validity of another "truth", because it becomes difficult to argue that there is another valid form of reality, of sunlight or voices, that we do not perceive. Plato designed his allegory to focus on the idea of truth, rather than the thought that multiple truths may exist. This fits well into Plato's theory of one higher truth, but it is a view not necessarily shared by all, and so makes weak ground upon which to base one's argument.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Allegory of the Cave

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Allegory of the Cave is a metaphor that can be seen to describe many aspects and situations in life that one had no control or choice over. The reason Plato uses many metaphors in his allegory is to think or ‘philosophize’ about the world around us because in fact our understanding of the world is very limited. This is due to the fact that we live in a world of shadows and not reality to whom very little is actually known about by everyone. The metaphors are seen to actually represent a society with all its people, truths, hidden meanings, problems, solutions etc… The meanings transferred in the allegory of the cave apply to philosophy because it shows the philosophers position in society. It gives the philosopher the opportunity to philosophize/think about what exists/reality and what does not exist in our surrounding environment. To society, the allegory of the cave contemplates many issues related to man in his society. Such issues include human’s ability to be ignorant or knowledgeable, free or imprisoned, stubborn, lazy, active, etc… by choosing either to or not to search for answers to many of the issues that arise continuously. Moreover, The Allegory of the Cave is about ignorance and learning because the men in the cave are ignorant or unaware of the outside world that exists except for the shadows that they saw passing by on the walls. The man who is freed engages in the process of learning from the moment he is released from the cave and is forced to adapt to the new conditions and situations that now surround him. In addition, the chains are used to symbolize the limited amount of information that a person has about reality. For whatever reason, this limited amount of information can be considered to be a type of ignorance. Last but not least, as humans in this world, many of us are really ignorant…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Socrates To Meno

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Within the story Socrates and the character Meno began by searching for what virtue was. Meno simply wanted to know the nature of it, how it was acquired, but Socrates felt the definition was needed first. In the end Meno gets frustrated with the whole discussion and feels they can’t inquire about something they don’t know about. This where the concepts of knowledge and true belief come into the Meno. To prove to Meno they are able to conduct inquiry into the unknown Socrates does a demonstration with a slave boy to prove his assertion that all learning is recollection. In this demonstration he has the slave boy answer geometry questions. The slave boy does not know geometry. Throughout the demonstration Socrates simply draws pictures and asks questions to guide the boy to the answer. At the end of the discussion the slave boy who had no knowledge of geometry was able to answer a few geometrical questions. Socrates takes this to prove his assertion that the soul is immortal, and therefore all learning is recollection. Socrates says because the soul is immortal it possesses all knowledge within it, and what we call learning is really recollecting. We acquire knowledge through inquiring about things until we are able to ‘remember’ them as Socrates states it. Once we have done sufficient inquiry these true beliefs within us become knowledge once again as…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s analogy of the cave he suggests that the prisoners are held back by their senses telling them that the world that they see is in fact reality, whereas Plato disagrees with this. Plato believed that once the escapee (Philosopher) is outside of the cave, that they can use the power of reason to truly know what reality is. He believes that the world around us is not real, and that the world of the forms is the true reality where we can gain knowledge and understanding.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Cave

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato shows his epistemology through the cave which was with the stages to find knowledge. The stages show the process of the intellect where you are reasoning and working to understand. This was when they were in the cave and saw nothing but shadows which was the first stage of imagination. The second stage was when the freed prisoner saw how the shadows were being formed which was the stage of belief. Then we go into the third stage, which was when the prisoner sees the real world and takes in the real objects, which is the stage of ideas and thoughts. In other words, this stage can be the senses, which the body understands by seeing, touching, smelling, hearing, and tasting. Lastly the freed prisoner starts grasping everything and understands which is the stage of understanding. Plato shows how one must go through these stages to seek…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    english paper

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”, Socrates illustrates a metaphorical story about attaining knowledge. He describes a cave with men who are chained, prisoners of the cave. They face a wall; that is all they can see because they cannot move their heads. They cannot even look behind them to see a walkway and a fire. As a person passes on the walkway, a shadow is projected onto the wall in front of the prisoners; this is all they know. Only the shadows are what is real to them because it’s all they have ever known. Socrates says, “How could they see anything but the shadows if they were never allowed to move their heads?” (Plato 479). The main point is that people cannot understand anything except what is being projected right in front of them. Socrates’ point is that society has a limited understanding of knowledge, and is ignorant about what is beyond the surroundings.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many philosophers have tried to figure out what exactly true knowledge is. For years they have been asking questions and looking deep into the mind to better understand the methods needed to get to true knowledge. If we go back to some of the earliest philosophers we meet Plato in Greece. Plato tried to take on the question himself in a fictional conversation he wrote up between Socrates and Meno, and in which we see some insight to what he believes it is. In the conversation Socrates asks the question of what virtue really is. Meno tries to answer by giving a very specific answer as to what virtue was within Greek society of that day, but Socrates then replies that although one who follows what Meno said is considered to be a virtuous person, it still does not define virtue itself. After a while of conversation Meno gets frustrated and gives up, as they could not come to a true definition of virtue. Socrates (Plato) then explains that in order to really know something you have to be able to reason and withhold the Socratic conversation (kind of like a devil’s advocate conversation) in which they discuss the concept at question and bounce back and forth until there is a real answer. Socrates then goes on to say that inside every person’s soul and mind is knowledge they carry with them from their past lives. They know everything already and when they learn it is merely a recollection. True knowledge is really already in our minds but just has to be brought out. Socrates then demonstrates this with a slave and some mathematical equations, but also tries to show the difference between true belief and true knowledge as at one point the slave boy believed he was write, but wasn’t. Plato comes to say that even though one may have true belief in something he still may not truly know that that something is true.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates goes ahead to answer Meno’s argument by telling him that the priests and priestess and other divinely inspired poets say that the soul of a man is immortal. He uses the immortality to say that the soul has seen everything in this world and the other world and, therefore, it has learned everything that is. Therefore man should not be surprised if the soul recalls the knowledge of virtue or anything that the soul possessed. Socrates argues that, when a man…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays