Preview

Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay
In the late 1700s, there was a surplus of arguments supporting or fighting against ratifying the Constitution. Ratification of the Constitution is not what's best for U.S citizens because although the Bill of Rights was proved to be successful, the insecurity of rights amongst the people, as well as the massive amount of influence that the people of power had; this will not lead to a successful nation. Documents three points out many major holes in the ratification of the Constitution such as insecurity in rights. Document four gives a supporting view as to why the United States should ratify the Constitution, it discusses how Massachusetts solved one problem, the insecurity of rights. Document five points out the people’s fear in the …show more content…
Document four is a direct counter argument to document three. Document four is an excerpt from a resolution from the Massachusetts Constitutional Ratification Convention. It discusses the fact that Massachusetts only passes the Constitution given that certain rights would pass as well. Reassuring the people that their rights would be protected. Document four discusses how Massachusetts also said that a bill of rights would completely resolve all the problems and worries that were discussed in document three.
Back to the opposing view of the ratification of the Constitution is Document five. Document five talks about the types of people that are trying to get into congress, and may be in congress fool the citizens with their nice and smart voices as well as their money; when really they only discuss the tip of the matter with you. And aren’t doing as much as they could be doing. The document also talks about that theses people who have the money are able to use that money to travel to Philadelphia and have an impact on congress, and their impact will most likely be in the best interest of the wealthy rather than the interest of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. Imagine you are either a Federalist or Anti-Federalist. Argue for (or against) ratification of the Constitution. Include economic status, geographic region and political ideals in your argument.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S. Constitution Ratification Debates - U.S. Constitution Ratification Debates On September 28, 1787, after three days of bitter debate, the Confederation Congress sent the Constitution to the states with neither an endorsement nor a condemnation. This action, a compromise engineered by Federalist members, disposed of the argument that the convention had exceeded its mandate; in the tacit opinion of Congress, the Constitution was validly before the people. The state legislatures ' decisions to hold ratifying conventions confirmed the Constitution 's legitimacy.... [tags: Papers]…

    • 6771 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These historians do not believe Charles Beard's thesis and try to disprove his thoughts and prove that the supports did not write the Constitution for their own interest. In a chart, which shows the Delegates that were at the Constitution Convention. The Delegates on this chart are people having public security holdings, who are people from all different backgrounds. The Delegates mostly signed the Constitution were not all wealthy landowners looking out for them. There was some small farmer in that group, who would never sign the document to benefit the rich. In other chart on the Delegates to the New York State Ratifying Convention shows that there was a mixes of people with different economic status voting for the Ratifying Convention. Also the people who voted were Federal and Anti-Federal that voted Federal, plus lawyers did not vote for it and those would be the kind of people to want…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various men such as George Mason, refused to sign the constitution due to the disapproval of “... the compromise by which the South conceded a simple majority vote in Congress on navigation laws in return for twenty more years of African slave trade..” (The Confederation and the Constitution, 172). In addition, after receiving a copy of the Constitution, Thomas Jefferson was troubled by features, such as the absence of a Bill of Rights. At the Ratification Debate in Massachusetts, small farmers and states rights people were also against the Constitution, due to taxes. These taxes made the people feel powerless and as if they had no rights, since the government was taking money from them aste British previously did. Furthermore, a town keeper was against the fact that the congress has the power i lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and much more, since he believes he might not be able to pay these taxes and does not see a point in doing so, since the army is in a time of peace. These objections to the Constitution shows that before the final signing, people were still very discontent with the new form of government, many of them felt attacked instead of…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The states however were not satisfied if the requirements would be presented to them completely. For the most part some states led by George Mason from Virginia requested and enforced a Bill of Rights to be ratified before the final document was galvanized. Ratification for the Bill of Rights would prove crucial strain for the US Constitution simply because it would set thickened safeguards for citizens and protect rights of those accused of criminal infringements (O 'Connor and Sabato 2009, pg. 57). Enacted into law, the new Constitution was ratified and enacted. Everyone was not pleasant entirely with it. Benjamin Franklin…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story, Arguments against Ratification at the Virginia Convention was all about the delegates at the Virginia Convention debating the constitution and the ninth vote for ratification which many pushed for. In the book it says, “...the acceptance of only nine states would not have boded well for strength and unity of the new nation, so the Constitution's supporters set out to make ratification a unanimous mandate for change”. They pushed hard to convince nine states…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A lot of people think that the constitution should not be ratified but I think that the constitution should be ratified for three main reasons.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fear of tyranny and corruption, two arguments against the ratification of the Constitution were that if they increased the power of the central government they would be too far away to help the citizens with their concerns, instead they favored the rights of the states and the active representation of the average citizens. They also argued to keep the unicameral legislature, they believed that local and state governments represented voters more fairly. They also argued that the newly ratified Constitution didn’t guarantee protection for some basic liberties.They also believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal court, they said that the federal courts wouldn’t be able to provide justice to the average citizen like state…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US Constitution Process

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Document 4: Patrick Henry opposed the Constitution because he believed it endangered our rights and privileges. Henry believed that our sovereignty would be relinquished. Also, he believed the rights of conscience, trial by jury, and liberty of the press were caused to be insecure.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison was one of the founding father and fourth president of United States. Madison draft most of the US constitution and all of the Bill of Rights and later he was referred as “Father of Constitution.” He wrote federalist 10 in late 1700s which played influencing role in ratification of the constitution. In his federalist #10 he addresses his vision concerning the constitution and focuses on the issue of small country is good or bad through his examination of factions. Madison defines faction as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of others citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the United States won the war against England in Yorktown it was up to the colonists to build a government from the ground up. The decisions made in the creation of the United States were arguably the most important events in the united states. In the year 1788 the Constitution was ratified by New Hampshire, officially doing away with articles of the confederation that so heavily hindered the government previously, creating a more balanced government that is still in place today.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    third

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After several years of comparatively weak government under the Articles of Confederation, a Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia proposed a new constitution on September 17, 1787, featuring a stronger chief executive and other changes. George Mason, a Constitutional Convention delegate and the drafter of Virginia's Declaration of Rights, proposed that a bill of rights listing and guaranteeing civil liberties be included. Other delegates including future Bill of Rights drafter James Madison disagreed, arguing that existing state guarantees of civil liberties were sufficient and that any attempt to enumerate individual rights risked the implication that other, unnamed rights were unprotected. After a brief debate, Mason's proposal was defeated by a unanimous vote of the state delegations.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an important moment for delegates to decide whether or not to ratify The Constitution. This is an important moment in our countries history because the delegates are deciding how the government is going to work.Why we have created this document is because the Articles of Confederation aren't working, and people think that the constitution are not going to work either.The proposed will give us Constitution nothing but failure. The Constitution shouldn't be ratified because this form of government has never been tried, even by Great Britain, and it could destroy the country a lot worse then the Articles of Confederation, it not only will do that but, even with the risk, we will have all branches of government to be filled with the wealthy elite class of people. And for these reasons, I think we shouldn't ratify the Constitution.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Federalist Papers-aimed to convince Americans to accept the new Constitution. Published in New York. Written by Hamilton, Madison, Jay. Patrick Henry of Virginia and George Clinton argued against the constitution saying it takes away individual rights, replicates monarchy, and doesn’t have a bill or rights, and was illegal. The federalists had Franklin & Washington in their meetings=major plus. Led the Federalists to add a Bill of Rights. Clinton also published essay under the name “Cato” going against the constitution. See antifederalists, Hamilton.…

    • 3959 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays