Preview

Radical Theories on Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Radical Theories on Crime
RADICAL THEORY Many people are identify as a criminal for their actions on wich those actions were forced for the demoralization and brutalization of conditions under many people are force to live. Radical theories of crime causation are generally based on the uneven wealth in a sociaty. The longest people can find weaker people it will always be a cause for a crime by taking advantage of other people or preying on the them or in others cases when the person is force to commit a crime for the situation or necessity in the envaroment on where the person find itself.
Radical criminologists argue that capitalism is an economy system that requires people to compete against each other in the individualistic pursuit of material wealth. In this theory people are classified in two groups; “ruling class” wich are those who have power by virtue of the ownership of material wealth and “working class or nonworking class” wich are those who struggle to survive on the society.
In some of those cases members from the “ruling class” prey on the lower class and violating their humans rights knowing that because the legal system flavours the wealthy they less likely to be arrested and punished or in some others cases the “working class or nonworking class” commit a crime for necessity of financial survival depending on the sitiation on where the crime is committed because without money result to crime in order to enjoy the luxuries of the wealthy and powerful.
Some of the examples for this theory would be when a rich person committed a crime and just because he can get good attorney he's sentence is reduced. Now when a non wealth person committed a crime and because he can't pay an attorney he will probably have to do his time of his sentence.
If wealth was redistributed economic, political and social levels then the rates of crime would be minimize and if an individual decide to commit a crime would by choice. Any individual cannot be judge and classified as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime occurs when society does not provide its members with equal opportunities in society. The individuals are not given equal opportunity in society will not have the same investment in their community as members of society that are afforded job and educational opportunities. When social functions are not equal the members of society are not recognized by society, he or she will develop their own unique subculture is more accepting of crime (Rock, 2012). This type of subculture appears in lower income and poverty…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law that reflects the interest of the ruling-class society enhances the principles of capitalism, which Chambliss (1976) argues has bred a nature within the people that consist of greed, self-interest and hostility. This, Chambliss argues, is what essentially motivates crime and deviance at all levels of society. Gordon (1976) supports this by arguing that crime is a ‘rational’ response to a ‘dog-eat-dog’ society where selfishness and competition is more profound as opposed to public duty and collective wellbeing.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals lead to crime for slightly different reasons which relate to their unique genetic character, their corresponding mental ability, their socialization and life circumstances; it is the interplay of these and other variables, any one of which may be more determinative in a particular case that causes a particular individual to resort to crime. Consequently, crime, like poverty, doesn't lend itself very well to comprehensive solutions, unless these solutions simultaneously address all the dominant factors underlying its causation in the majority of cases. The “Urban Society-Gesellshaft Thesis” goes on to say that important normative constraint which served to deter criminal behavior in the past tend to be absent in modern urban societies. The dramatic increase in crime in the 19th and 20th centuries has been attributed to the absence of a sense of community in urban societies.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Radical Criminology is a conflict that bases its perspectives on crime and law in the belief that capitalist societies define crime as the owners of the means of production use their power to enact laws that will control the working class and repress threats to the power of the ruling class. It is there to make governments aware of various crimes they commit against human rights and national laws. It might view modern society because they believe the police are serving the needs of the elite few at the expense of the majority. Crimes of the low income and working class result from political decisions which result in the choices of political workers. It states that the causes of crime can be found in social conditions that empower the wealthy…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Traditional Marxists believe that crime is inevitable in all societies because capitalism is criminogenic suggesting that it is societies very nature that causes crime. According to traditional Marxists society causes capitalism in different ways. One of which is due to poverty. The lack of social mobility means that people find it difficult to move up the social classes. And therefore those in poverty that cannot afford necessities such as food result in utilitarian crimes (crimes with a purpose) for example theft In order to survive. Another way that capitalism causes crime is due to capitalism advertising products encouraging the false need and desire for consumer goods. A false need makes an individual believe that they need a product when in reality they don’t, for example cars, phones etc. They can achieve this through the media for example TV advertisements and billboards, because people believe this is what they need if they cannot afford it legitimately then they may turn to crime. Thirdly capitalism can cause crime through alienation (individuals feeling isolated from the rest of society) as a lack of control of their lives may lead to crimes of violence and other non utilitarian crimes without a purpose for example domestic violence etc. This could occur whereby a partner feels frustrated with his social position and therefore takes it out on members of the family etc. Finally capitalism encourages a dog-eat-dog world therefore regardless of social class people always want more. This leads to crimes…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery in Another Name

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crime is considered as a purpose of conflict. It is categorized by a certain class that holds power over another in order to satisfy their need for economic and social welfare. Conflict theory is about social and economic power that exists in a society. Max Weber perceived the social hierarchies as a root cause of conflict in a society. He believed that societal relationships built on power, status and money. For example in the documentary Slavery in Another Name the relationship between black people and white people were solely based on economic power and the difference in status that existed. Marx and Engels distinguished classes based on their means of production. They called it the bourgeoisie (also known as the ruling class) and proletariat (the working class) (pg. 220). After being freed from slavery, the black and white competed with each other for status (which was the most important to the freed black slaves) money and power. “Turk developed a theory called criminalization that spelled out how criminal labels are applied. For example, criminalization is more likely when the subordinate groups are less sophisticated”. (pg. 221 para1)…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crime theories can vary greatly. A lot of people think that poverty or social status is a major factor on criminal behavior. Others believe that is embedded in human beings to be born with evil therefore we are attracted to crime. Bottom line is deterrence cannot be achieved unless the underlining cause for criminal behavior is found.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of this essay is to compare, contrast and evaluate two sociological theories of crime causation and two psychological theories of crime causation.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They argue ruling class crime is also a result of capitalism, as it creates competition and the profit motivates greed; encouraging people to commit corporate crimes, such as tax evasion and breaking health and safety laws. Gordon (1976) claims crime is a rational response to capitalism and thus is found in all classes.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Theories

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages

    P3 – Describe two theories of criminal behaviour and the factors that contribute to them…

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviant Question Paper

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (d) To what extent can criminal behaviour be explained in terms of social inequality? [8]…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Social Structure Theory is the result of underlying social conditions, such as poverty and unemployment. In society many people usually tend to commit crimes due to their poverty level or economic status in society. Crime is thus is created by the structure of society. Social Structure is built on the distribution of wealth and power. According to statistics people who are apart of the lower class are more likely led to commit a crime.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This question reveals that a major flaw existing within the status quo is that the current retributive model conveniently ignores the other factors that contribute to criminal behavior and the institutions that enable those behaviors via social, racial and economic oppression. The punishment model acquits society of any complicity…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality before the law is a fundamental aspect of this theory (Burke, 2013). However it has long been debated whether equality is possible in such a matter. Classicism wanted a system for dealing with crime which was fair and just on all levels of the process, irrespective of the offenders’ class, wealth or background (Taylor, Walton, & Young, 2013). However, there is substantial evidence which works against this idea of equality. Prejudices and biases still have a dramatic influence at all stages of the criminal justice system. The focus was on the crime and the crime alone, which is reflected in the legal system and the way laws are set, so that whoever commits the same act receives the same punishment (Bradley & Walters, 2005). The theory didn’t seek to understand why the crime was being committed, which is arguably a crucial factor to understand in wanting to reduce crime…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays