Preview

Queen Elizabeth's Absolutism In England

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
952 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Queen Elizabeth's Absolutism In England
In the beginning, England was strictly a place of Absolutism. Gradually, it transitioned into a Constitutionalism. On the other hand, Russia remained an Absolutism and flourished under their monarch.
In England, Queen Elizabeth was the first monarch to majorly change the country. She changed the religion of England back to the Anglican Church, after Mary was very against Protestants. She got rid of all the anti-Protestant legislation that Mary passed and made it alright for Protestants to live in England openly again. She took her job as the monarch very seriously and she made a speech that she considered herself the marriage partner of all of England. This shows how much she cared for her country and definitely fulfills the requirement of
…show more content…
He ruled on his own for a few years. He eventually ran into a problem when his Scottish subjects started rebelling. He was forced to reinstate Parliament in order to be allowed to raise taxes for the money he needed to quell the rebellions happening in Scotland. He was arrested for entering the House of Commons with the intent of discovering who his rival were and arresting him. He was not allowed to enter the House of Commons and got in trouble for doing so. This eventually led to the start of the English Civil War. Parliament passed an act to allow them to build an army and it led to major division between classes. After Charles I, Oliver Cromwell took over. He was a dictator and made lots of rules that followed his extremist Puritan views. Following Cromwell, came Charles II he was not such a successful monarch, as he tried and failed to change the religious situation in England. Following Charles II came James I. Parliament did not like James II and they invite William of Orange and Mary to take over England. They agree and storm England. They were met with no resistance, and James II simply ran away. This shows how he values his life over his country and he is not a good …show more content…
The difference between England and Russia was that in England there was already an established Parliament that had power and could withhold their power from the monarch. On the other hand, there was nobody in Russia to compete with the monarch for their power. This is why Parliament was successfully able to convert England to a Constitutionalism while Russia remained an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the 16th and 18th century, absolute monarchs were the dominant ruling powers in Europe. Catherine II was married to the Grand Duke Peter, who would inherit the Russian throne upon Empress Elizabeth’s death, Catherine II later overthrew her husband and gained access to the throne in 1762, where she ruled Russia during its Golden Age until her death in 1796. Her political views were influenced by her interest in philosophy, during her reign, she brought multiple political reforms to the Russian government. As Russia’s monarch, Catherine II expanded Russia’s borders to include lands surrounding the Black Sea and parts of Poland in three partitions that divided Poland amongst Russia, Austria, and Prussia. Catherine II favored nobles above…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles the First became king in England, (also in Scotland) in 1625. He caused many problems with the Parliament because he believed in absolute monarchy. At one point Parliament limited Charles The First's power and he went along with a petition they had made but soon dismissed the Parliament.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsarism thrived for hundreds of years but as Russians became more educated they decided that communism and a dictatorship was too harsh and after a few revolutions Tsarism was a thing from the past. In the years 1881 to 1905 many things changed in Russia for the better and for the worse.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, women have been constantly viewed and treated as inferior to men. Throughout English history, there have been many female monarchs. Among these monarchs is Elizabeth I. Elizabeth’s predecessor was Mary I, who tried to restore England to Catholicism and was heavily disliked by her subjects. Elizabeth’s period of rule commenced during 1558 and lasted until 1603. Since Elizabeth I ensured that England stayed an Anglican country, she was greatly loved by her people and was able to earn respect as a ruler. However, since Elizabeth I was a female during a time where the idea of female inferiority was shared by the majority of people, she did not attain as much respect as a king would have. During Elizabeth’s reign, she used her…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism has a great power that monarch, monarchy is the type of country that tends to be reported to the awe and respect.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason that Queen Elizabeth I is considered influential is because from birth she was faced with struggle. When Elizabeth was born into the Tudor family on September 7th, 1553, her parents thought she was a disappointment. “The son she had hoped so confidently to bear the man child, who would save England from a threatened civil war, this child had somehow withdrawn among the shadows and in his place there emerged this little girl Elizabeth.” Her parents, King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn wanted a son who could take the throne and rule England but to their dismay they got a daughter. Growing up Elizabeth had to deal with not having a female role model in her life.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way Britain stands out from both countries is that it has a Constitutional monarchy. This means that there was a constitution passed. It was the first in the world to limit the power of the monarch. Its name is the Magna Carta. This means that the country wanted their rights so they wrote them down and made them legal. Although they have a monarch, or a royal family, the Queen doesn’t have actual power. Although, the army still swears allegiance to the throne. Also, the Prime minister and the government run the country. Those are the people who make all decisions pertaining to Britain’s people. The royal family is…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth I once said, “A fool too late bewares when all the peril is past” (WEW). Elizabeth I was the queen of England from 1558 until 1603, and had a goal of preserving English peace and prosperity (RRR). She was one of the few female monarchs that believed in making England better while she was in power so she does not mull over it later on. The Elizabethan era was named after Elizabeth I, which lasted for 45 years. This era is considered to be a golden age in English history because it was a time of temporary peace and prosperity.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spanish & Russian Empires

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both the Spanish and Russian empires were goeverned by an autocratic body of government. The Russian empire was ruled by a czar, while the title of the head of Spain is a king. The set up of the government of the Spanish empire was probably was developed by the catholic church, while the Russians probably modeled their government after ideas borrowed from the west. From a pollitical standpoint the major difference between the empires was that the Spanish was a maritime empire while the Russian were a landbased empire. While the Spanish focused primarily on expanding overseas, the Russians felt it was better to expandm without traveling overseas. Since the Spanish also controlled land overseas they developed a system known as viceroyalty, where a govenor was put in place to oversee the control of the Spanish colonies in the new world.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The queen is not important because she does not participate in the government or running the country the job is done by the Prime minister. The only thing she does is signs the final bill so that it becomes a law. Unfortunately she does not check it, or read it. The parliament decides amongst them by using a vote and debate system and decides on the bill. The queen is there used as a signer.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays