Preview

Comparing English Government Compared To Today's Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing English Government Compared To Today's Government
12/1/11
Period: 9
Mr.Irvan

Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.

England’s choice of limited government had positives and negatives. In England before the bill of rights they had a monarchy. James I wrote that “for kings are not only Gods lieutenants upon earth and sit upon
…show more content…
One of those major reasons why I feel that the French form of government is better is because the type of government gives more freedom and protection to the people of the country. As I stated earlier the French paid, gave them food, and trained them just for joining the army. Also they provided the people with multiple jobs. This made their economy better than the English economy which then made the people happier and won’t make them steel and do other things. Thomas Hobbes said that people are naturally cruel greedy and selfish. In my opinion I feel that this is true but with the French’s style of government I don’t think people will be as greedy and selfish as much as the people from England because they are already happy with how the government is treating them. This also made the country more stable because the people wouldn’t have any riots or do anything to go against the government because they are happy with what they have. This then helped the king make decisions to make the government and the country better and more suitable for the people to live

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Governments benefit from a well-organized and efficient taxation system. The taxation system in France is best described as being diabolical, the taxation system was burdensome upon the middle class and the more prosperous peasants, given that the nobles were largely able to exempt themselves from it.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 16th and 17th centuries, many European nations grew into the mold of absolutism. Starting with the role of James I, England underwent absolutist reforms as Parliament was often suppressed by the ruling monarch until the Glorious Revolution, when the supremacy of Parliament was established.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Experience of France and England in the 17th century demonstrates the intellectual and practical superiority of absolutism over constitutionalism. Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England. Absolutism controlled all competing interest groups and organized all religious sects. Louis XIV had centralized power and control under his authority in France while Constitutionalism in England failed to create absolute monarchy. Constitutionalism in England dealt with James I, Charles I, and James II that led to a catastrophe.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 16th and 17th century Europe, political views on the government varied in Europe. After the Catholic Church’s downfall, absolute monarchs dominated Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that mostly kings favored absolutism and have superiority over their people. On the other hand, some viewed absolutism as a power that made people inferior to the government.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism DBQ

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two main forms of government. The two main forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these types of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism was the most effective type of government during that time period. Absolutism is when the ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people of their nation. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them instead of a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 Absolutism

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries absolutism was a more effective type of government than democracy. Absolutism was a form of government in which all of the power is in the hands of one ruler. Whereas, democracy is when the majority of the power is vested in the people. Absolutism occurred before the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; therefore it had an example to be or not to be modeled after. Even though most forms of absolutistic governments shared the same thought, they differed in the ways that they were ruled. Democracy was also a form of government during this time but it was not as successful.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them rather then a democracy were many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the two political models of absolutism and constitutionalism is the catalyst for the progression in English politics. With William and Mary as their rulers, the Parliament didn’t need to worry about a Catholic ruler and even better they were able to get their rulers to recognize the Bill of Rights of 1689. Finally able to limit the power of the monarch, making the ruler subject to the law and the consent of Parliament, the theory of a constitutional monarchy was put into action through this bill. This is the beginning of England’s, later Great Britain, rise to being a world power and setting an example that others will soon…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq essay

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Age of Democracy and the Age of Absolutism were two different periods of time. The age of Enlightenment had new ideas spreading throughout the world about government and human rights. The enlightenment was a great period of establishment of democracy .A democracy is when the common people are considered as the primary source of political power. Throughout the enlightenment there were philosophers who believed greatly in a democratic government. Some of the most familiar philosophers were Voltaire, John Locke, and Montesquieu. Each one of these philosophers was humanists and believed in natural rights. The Age of Absolutism was a time of absolute monarchs who had total control of everything. They made laws as they went along and if they didn’t like what the people said the monarchs would throw the people into jail and or put them to death. The Age of democracy is a response or answer to the Age of Absolutism by the new ideas that spread throughout the world. Although democracy and absolutism had advantages and disadvantages, democracy was a more effective type of government for it limited royal power and protected the rights of the people socially, politically, and economically. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, tension arose between the two different types of governments, the democracy and absolute monarchs.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    magnesuim

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there were two forms of government, absolutism and democracy. Absolutism is when a ruler has unlimited power. A democracy is a form of government in which every person can participate in. Many rulers had a democratic government, but absolutism was more beneficial to the rulers because it gave them all the power.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays