Preview

Public Historian's Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1059 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Public Historian's Research
However, when the public historian researches a question presented to them by society, the historian goes beyond their specialized area to discover the answer. These questions do not only pertain to the ones asked by society, but they also consist of questions from museums, organizations, agencies, or even various groups where the historian is employed. When conducting their research, the public historian often finds that, they cannot claim ownership to history. Once the historian realizes that they do not own history, but it belongs to society, the historian then realizes the importance of archiving and maintaining the data that they find which enables an accurate account of the past to be preserved for the current members of society and its future generations.
Once, a public historian has completed their research they then present their findings to the public. From here, the public reviews, defends, or debates the historian’s research. Regarding how a public historian’s research differs from that of their academic counterparts, public historians are
…show more content…
As the profession of public history evolved from its roots as a graduate program, its definition as a study shows the versatileness of its historians. The separation between the public and academic historian strictly defines public history as an area of history whose historians serve the public and go outside their realm of study to answer society’s questions. Ethics helps to define public history as it ensures its historian’s credibility and ability to provide the public with truthful historical facts. Ultimately, the question of what is public history is seen through the historian’s devotion and willingness to serve

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Among the reading assignments, the chapter “Who Owns the Past?” in Dangerous Game by MacMillan piqued my interest to elaborate on. In this chapter, she emphasizes that history is written by many historians who have their own views, interpretations, and biases. In this regard, she implies that we should not simply believe in what historians claim, but dig into its sources and figure out from many perspectives. There are many ‘bad’ history produced by historians without offering a wide range of views and this can be used as an instrument that can largely influence on people by giving them prejudice on certain events. There are always reasons behind each event and it is important to find out what indeed happened as well as where the history is…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Every empire tells itself and the world that it is unlike all other empires and that its mission is not to plunder and control but to educate and liberate” is a quote by Edward W. Said. During the 19th century, Western nations started expansion into territorial imperialism to collect resources from colonies to benefit economically, politically, and socially. Jules Ferry, a former French prime minister, created a colonial policy to colonize territories for France’s benefits and to civilize the people in those territories. His biased views may affect the historical impact and people should not believe everything they hear. One should analyze a document and take past knowledge on the issue into consideration before making any decisions.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    extention history

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    …histories have sought to challenge the monotone voice of traditional history, not only to find a place for other viewpoints and stories, but also to make historians realise how much they unthinkingly take for granted….…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History is the procedure used to analyze what was significant about chosen events, individuals, and advancements from the past. Historians utilize distinctive arrangements of criteria to help them make judgements about essentialness. All theories have to base on data. To make the country become better, people needs the data from the past to guide their country to the bright future. The old said: “the one who controls the past controls the future.”…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians are seen as individuals telling the common folks of the world, in this case the common folk of the United States, the events of the past. Historians do not just regurgitate facts, they create a narrative; mostly made up of facts, but also from their perspective. What individuals do not realize is historians do not miraculously know the information; they must research the information from evidence, from a certain period, making historians a type of detective. A detective investigates evidence to decipher the events that took place; just like a historian. In Jackson’s Frontier-and Turner’s, each historians individual perspective, and their present circumstances, had an impact on the evidence they used for their research, and the outlook they had on the evidence about Andrew Jackson and what kind of man he was seen as.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Malka Survival

    • 2488 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The excerpt illustrates historiography because we are learning about different historians their works and how they viewed history. The study of historians their work and how they changed throughout time.…

    • 2488 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History work

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    July 9, 1776 -- Washington orders that the Declaration of Independence be read before the American army in New York -- from his personal copy of the "Dunlap Broadside."…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    refashion its historical heroes in a contemporary idiom, but doing so carries with it an obvious…

    • 5814 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History is the study of past events, specifically human affairs. We use the study of history to investigate and seek to explain how people have changed over time. Historians use all forms of evidence to examine, interpret, revisit, and reinterpret the past. These include not just written documents, but also oral communication. Also, objects and art such as sculptures, buildings, artifacts, photographs, and paintings are used to interpret the past. Historians do not always agree on interpretations of the past. Many say that the survivors have written our history. But nevertheless, debated differences help expand and enhance our understanding of human development.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine living during a time where if you thought something was wrong then you would be gruesomely executed by having your head sliced strait off your head. During the French Revolution there was a time where thousands of people were being executed using the infamous guillotine. This period of time was referred to as The Reign of Terror. During this time a group of extremist were in charge of the country. These extremists were not to be mess with because they ordered over 15,000 people to be executed with the guillotine. The revolutionist would execute anyone who was suspected of speaking against the revolution and the action the extremist were taking. The Reign of Terror started in September 1793 and ended in July 1794. In some ways this was justified by the way the peasants were treated. But at the same time in was very hypocritical of them to do these acts. The Reign of terror had aspects of being justified but of course was not completely right, it was justified because they needed to resolve to violence to get their point across, because they were in desperate times and needed to resolve to drastic measures in order to get what they wanted, and the king needed to be taken down however killing many people went against what they were fighting for.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccuracies continue to plague populist histories, and as such those within the academic field continue to rebut their rivals with these flaws. They argue that these, as Margaret Conrad states, “producers” of “historical films” intentionally integrate inaccuracies in order to entertain their audience, rather than inform. Contrasting this view, modern historian Michelle Arrows argues that “academic historians ignore TV and their [our] own peril”. This viewpoint conveys the necessity of establishing a balance between academic historians and popular historians to, as Margaret Conrad believes, “generate a dialogue with the public”. Academic historians argue they present history “as it actually was” (enlightened historian Von Ranke). This is substantiated with their argument that they exclusively present history with full accuracy. It is this disagreement that enforces the considerable tension between academic and popular historians.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public History is an avenue that I can pursue that combines all of the aspects of the…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The study of history as a means of improving citizens' moral and civic virtues and enabling them to know and exercise their rights and duties.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Historians

    • 6747 Words
    • 27 Pages

    One must decide the meaning of "progressive historiography." It can mean either the history written by "progressive historians," or it can mean history written by historians of the Progressive era of American history and shortly after. The focus that was chosen for this paper is more in keeping with the latter interpretation, if for no other reason than it provides a useful compare-and-contrast "control" literature. <br><br>The caveat is this: the focus of this report is on the predominant question of the historiographical period: was the war a revolution or a war for independence? One could choose many other questions to argue, questions that historians have for years disputed about the revolution, but there are a number of reasons why this report was chosen for this particular assignment; the two best follow. First, it is an old and time-honored question that professors and instructors have posed to their students for years; of pre-Civil War historiographical questions, it is perhaps second only in fashion during the last twenty to twenty-five years to the Jefferson-Hemmings paternity controversy. Second, the revolution-or-independence question is one of those which must be answered through interpretation. A case cannot be made that is so utterly conclusive as to exclude all others; it is that very fact that makes history at once so frustrating and so fascinating. What better way could there be to look at the writings of a specific school of historians? Therefore, in the pursuit of "personal truth," we must proceed... <br><br>Perhaps the most famous of all progressive historians is Frederick Jackson Turner. His most famous argument is not devoted strictly to the American Revolution, but instead to the effects of the American frontier. In a sentence, his argument is that the frontier was the chief determinant in American history. <br><br>This is not to say that Turner did not write about the war; he did, in his seminal work, "The Frontier in American History,"…

    • 6747 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays