Psywar

Author’s version of:
Case, J. M. (2008). Alienation and engagement: Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning. Higher Education, 55(3), 321 - 332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9057-5 Alienation and engagement:
Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning

Jennifer M. Case
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town

Abstract

In this paper it is suggested that the themes of alienation and engagement offer a productive alternative perspective for characterising the student experience of learning in higher education, compared to current dominant perspectives such as that offered by approaches to learning and related concepts. A conceptual and historical background of the concept of alienation is presented, followed by an overview of some contemporary perspectives. Drawing on this literature, a framework is then developed for characterising student learning. It comprises three categories, referring to the alienation resulting from 1. entering the higher education community, 2. fitting into the higher education community, and 3. staying in the higher education community. Each category has an associated set of theoretical tools that can be drawn upon in analysing this aspect of the student experience.

Keywords: alienation, engagement, student learning, tertiary education, approaches to learning

Address for correspondence:
Dr J Case, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Alienation and engagement:
Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning

Jennifer Case
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town

Introduction

For as long as there have been formal institutions of higher education there have been concerns about the

References: Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). (London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press) Bourdieu, P Case, J. M. (2004). A critical look at innovative practice from the student perspective. (In C. Baillie & I. Moore (Eds.), Effective Learning and Teaching in Engineering (pp. 139-155). Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.) Case, J Case, J. M. & Gunstone, R. F. (2006). Metacognitive development: A view beyond cognition. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 51-67. De Man, A. & Devisse, T. (1987). Locus of control, mental ability, self-esteem and alienation. Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2), 233-236. Entwistle, N. J. (1997). Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb. Higher Education, 33(2), 213-218. Gee, J. P. (2001). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. (Paper presented at the Science Literacy Connections Conference, Baltimore, MD) Geyer, F Gibbs, G., Morgan, A. & Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. (In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning (pp. 165-188). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.) Haggis, T Hand, L. & Bryson, C. (2005). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. (Paper presented at the Staff and Education Development Association (SEDA) Spring Conference, Belfast.) Hodkinson, P Kember, D., Lee, K. & Li, N. (2001). Cultivating a sense of belonging in part-time students. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(4), 326-341. Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316. Loo, C. M. & Rolison, G. (1986). Alienation of ethnic minority students at a predominantly white university. Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 58-77. Malcolm, J. & Zukas, M. (2001). Bridging pedagogic gaps: conceptual discontinuities in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 33-42. Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19. Mehra, N. (1973). Alienation: Meaning, origins and forms. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 19(2), 129-143. Newman, J. H. (1852/1964). The idea of a university. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston) Ramsden, P Rendon, L., Jalomo, R. & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. (In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127-156). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt.) Rodney, C Schabracq, M. & Cooper, C. (2003). To be me or not to be me: about alienation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 53-79. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783-791. Seeman, M. (1983). Alienation motifs in contemporary theorizing: The hidden continuity of the classic themes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(3), 171-184. Seeman, M. (2001). Alienation: Psychosociological Tradition. (In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 385-388). Amsterdam: Elsevier.) Smith, D Suarez, S. A., Flowers, B. J., Garwood, C. S. & Szapocznik, J. (1997). Biculturalism, differentness, loneliness, and alienation in Hispanic college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 19(4), 489-199. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student departure. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) Tinto, V Webb, G. (1997). Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education, 33(2), 195-212. Yan, L. & Kember, D. (2004). Avoider and engager approaches by out-of-class groups: the group equivalent to individual learning approaches. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 27-49.