Preview

PS17 Everybodys Doing It Worksheet

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
127 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
PS17 Everybodys Doing It Worksheet
Psych Sim 17: EVERYBODY’S DOING IT!
This activity explores the issue of social influence – how the behavior of other people affects your behavior.
Social Influence
What is conformity?
Explaining Sherif’s Results
Why did Sherif’s participants change their estimates when they had to call out their answers in the presence of other people?
Explaining Asch’s Results
Why did Asch’s real participants deny the evidence of their eyes and report the obviously incorrect answer chosen by the other group members?
Motives for Conformity
Explain the difference between the two main motives for conformity: informational social influence and normative social influence.
Group Size and Conformity
What do you think happened in the “Gawker’s” study? Can you predict the results?
Resisting Social Influence
What is reactance?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conformity is a form of social influence and is the tendency to copy other people's behaviour and attitudes from within a group.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    d. Social Influence: how do messages influence (or fail to influence) people to change their attitudes, beliefs, a behaviors?…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Normative conformity is when a group of people is pressure due to a person wanting to fit in the group. An example of this is Asch line study. Informative conformity is when a person is not clear of the situation and compares their behavior with the group. An example of this is sheriff’s study.There was indication that conformity played a role in the jury’s decision. One of the jurors at first did not have a lot to say and seem indecisive as to whether or not the boy was guilty. He definitely had some doubts, but went along with the rest of the jurors because of all the pressure. The eldest juror votes but later changes his mind suggesting he went along with the rest of the jurors. Compare to another juror who also went with the other jurors’ opinions of voting not guilty. When they found the boy guilty, he also voted guilty but when the jurors changes to not guilty his mind changes to not guilty as well. However, he changed his plea for superficial reason so he conformed more because of normative influence. He did not believe the boy was guilty at…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exw 342 Study Guide

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    -A person’s behavior can be influenced by observing others within the context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media influence.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psy 210 Appendix E

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 200 to 300 words provide an opinion on who would be more likely to be persuaded by peer pressures such as drinking, drug use, skipping class, and other irresponsible behavior in a new city. Then provide your reasoning on why you chose either John or Donnie as more likely to conform to his new social situation. Reference the factors that influence persuasion and conformity discussed in your text.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, “The Invisible Influence: How Our Decisions Are Rarely Ever Our Own,” Jonah Berger discusses how even though we like to think our choices are driven by what we prefer, other people have an influence over almost everything we do. In both texts, the idea of how something is decided is subliminally done by the influence you acquire by those around you.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Review the section on Asch's Research from your textbook. Describe why the individuals in the Asch experiment usually gave the same answer when they probably knew that it was wrong. How do social control and social bonding explain conformity?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research into Conformity

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Research into conformity includes Sherif’s study conducted in 1935. The aims of his study were to study how people were influences by other people’s opinion, in their perception of the autokinetic effect. The Participants were seated in a dark room. Fifteen feet in front of the participants was a pinpoint of light that appears. Participants have to guess how far it moves. The dot doesn’t actually move but due to autokinetic effects, very small movements of the eyes make the light seem to move. Each participant developed their own personal answer, which varied considerably between individuals. Then the next day, three participants re-did the experiment, with two other participants that gave very different answers, to see if hearing other people’s answer would affect their answers. For example if a participant said it moved 6 inches when he was on his own. However when two other participants that said much less joined him, he says it moves much less than the day before. The first participants original response changes when in company of other people, this showing social influence. The…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conformity is the convergence of individuals’ thoughts, feelings, or behavior toward social norms. One of the most influential conformity researchers in psychological history is Muzafer Sherif, who researched the reason why people conform. Conformity can occur for two different reasons, such as, informational influence and normative influence. Normative influence is when people want to be liked and so by being in a group they gain social approval that leads to compliance. On the other hand, informational influence is when people want to be right, so they join a group that they perceive to be correct, which leads to acceptance.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Gross, 2010) In social situations, we perceive one person or group as having the legitimate authority to influence our behaviour (Sears, 2005). Through research, Robert Cialdini noted that they are six tendencies of human behaviour in response trying to influence another’s attitudes or actions. These are: reciprocity (reciprocation), liking, consistency, social validation, authority, and scarcity. (Cialdini, 2004)…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology Final

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Chapter 11 Social Psychology: studies how your thoughts, feelings, and behavior are influenced by the presence of other people and by the social and physical environment. Social Cognition: studies how we form impressions of others, how we interpret the meaning of other people’s behavior, and how our behavior is affected by our attitudes. Person Perception: an active and subjective process that occurs in a interpersonal context; is influenced by subjective perceptions, social norms, personal goals, and self-perception. Person perception often involves using mental shortcuts−social categorization, implicit personality theories. Attribution: Explaining the behavior of others reflects common cognitive biases and explanatory patterns; fundamental attribution error, blaming the victim, hindsight bias, self-serving bias, and self-effacing bias. Attitudes: A learned tendency to evaluate an object, person, or issue in a particular way; can have cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components; although attitudes typically influence behavior, sometimes our behavior influences our attitude. When a person’s behavior conflicts with his or her attitude, cognitive dissonance may be the result. Prejudice: A negative attitude toward people who belong to a specific social group. Stereotypes: form of social categorization in which a cluster of characteristics is attributed to all members of social group or category; stereotypes are fostered by in-group and out-group thinking, and the out-group homogeneity effect; in-group bias occurs when we attribute positive qualities to members of our own group. Muzafer Sherif: Robbers cave experiment demonstrated that intergroup conflict can be decreased when groups engage in a cooperative effort. Social influence: social psychology research area that investigates how our behavior is affected by situational factors and other people. Conformity: when you adjust your opinions, judgments, or behavior so that it matches other people, or the norms of a…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We as humans feel that we need to belong, we need to fit in and people need to like us. Normative social influence causes people to do what others say in order to be liked and fit in, so normative social influence might change ones opinion on singing and dancing in public. One might want to join a singing or dancing group that requires you to dance or sing in public to be a part of that group, so that person is being influence to dance or sing in public to be liked so they can join the group which shows how normative social influence might affect a person’s willingness to sing and dance in…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Social psychology focuses on three broad topics: how people think about, influence, and relate to one another.” (Social Psychology) When it comes to behavior and how people will act, many experiments were conducted to prove or disprove that “behavior is contagious”. (Social Psychology) Experiments such as Soloman Asch’s Conformity Experiment, Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiment and Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment all impacted modern psychology. These experiments proved that behavior is infectious and what some do impacts what others will do. In this paper, I will show that it is true, “behavior is contagious.” (Social Psychology)…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subjects were placed in a dark room and asked to estimate how far a dot of light moved. In reality the dot was not moving but it appeared to move due to something known as the auto kinetic effect which is an eye illusion where very small movements of the eyes make it appear that a small spot of light is moving in a dark room. When the subjects were asked individually, they established their own individual norms for the judgment and their answers varied considerably (2-6 inches). When they were asked as part of a group (2-3 people) and asked to all agree on the same thing, Sherif found that their responses mingled towards a central mean, noting the tendency to compromise. Sherif's subjects were not aware of this social influence and when they were asked directly if they were influenced by the judgments of the other people in the group during the experiments, most of them denied it. Afterwards, the subjects were tested one at a time again and most of these now conformed to the group judgment they recently made. A subject who had previously settled on an estimate of 2 inches or 6 inches was more likely to say the light was moving about 4 inches after their experience with the group. They had changed due to the group experience, increasing their conformity to group norms. The ecological validity of the experiment is pretty low due to the lab…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics