Pros And Cons Of Tobacco Lobbyism

) The Tobacco lobbyist commits the fallacy of appeal to force when urging the Senator through the threat of force to vote against the bill that would ban smoking in federal buildings. The argument is fallacious because the Tobacco lobbyists don’t give relevant evidence as to why the Senator should vote against the ban, such as pointing out how it would affect tobacco companies and their products. Instead they threaten the Senator by saying; “they represent a hundred thousand voters in your state.” In other words, if the Senator does not vote against the ban they will make sure that the hundred thousand voters in the Senator’s state speak out against him or her, which could potentially cost the Senator his or her job.
6) The speaker commits