Preview

Pros And Cons Of Pro Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Pro Death Penalty
The death penalty.

The death penalty.

The ultimate punishment for a crime is and should be the death penalty. With many views to cover and different types of view, this paper will be about pro death penalty. There is one point I will cover that will be against the death penalty, and that will be executing an innocent person, the rest will be cost to have inmates in jail and how incarceration does not rehabilitated inmates. Life or death is a very important decision that cannot be taken lightly.

The reason I am pro death penalty is because back in time there were not so many crimes committed and the reason was because they will make them pay. Now they have too many rights, privileges and they know that by making a deal with the prosecution
…show more content…
“Housing the approximate 500,000 people in jail in the USA awaiting trial who cannot afford bail cost $9 billion a year.” (Death Penalty Information Center) This is money that can be used to cure children that are sick for example with cancer or AIDS. I think that if someone committed a crime and took the life of another person, they should be executed, I know some people think that then the person will not suffer and that it will be an easy way out to the crime that was committed. But the cost to keep someone in prison for life is very expensive and not worth it, the person can commit another crime while in jail or can escape and will possibly kill to get whatever he/she needs to escape. The reason behind this is because this person does not have anything to loose if they are caught. Also the above cost has not taken in consideration if a person is sick and needs medical treatment, if he/she is so violent that he/she needs to have his/her own cell, which will also increase cost of money being wasted by having only one person in a cell versus two. “An example – Lubbock County, Texas has decided to build a $110 million megajail to ease the jail overcrowding.” This is another example of money just being wasted; I think that if a …show more content…
As I said before there are many crimes that leave a scar forever, for example sexual abuse, and should be taken as well in consideration when someone is being given life in prison, they should get the death penalty. Wasting too much money in feeding and making sure this people have a decent place is outrageous, that money should go into other things, like education or helping children that have life threating diseases. Also the amount of time a person is in jail before the sentence takes place is too long, ten or twenty years sitting on death row and wasting money is not worth it.

Reference

Incarceration in the United States cost. (2011 September 12th) Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States
Joe Arpio. (2011 September 15th) Retrieve from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Arpaio

Manning, S. New Jersey Law Journal. Op-ed: The Risk of Executing the Innocent (2002 February) Retrieved from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Finally, there is the issue of the effectiveness and fairness of the death penalty. There have been countless cases to come before the courts, alleging that there are innocent individuals on death row and that this is an act that cannot be reversed if the criminal allegations prove to be untrue. Adding to the issue is that the death penalty costs the state and ultimately society, millions of dollars to process a capital punishment. Most of the offenders on death row, challenge the process at every step of the judicial process and in doing so likely waste considerable resources as often the end result remains the same, barring new evidence.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros to the death penalty are that it protects innocent people and that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. Sentencing convicted murderers with the death penalty we are protecting inmates, guards, and people outside the prison. If we do not sentence convicted murderers with the death penalty and instead sentence them with life we are giving them the opportunity to murder while in prison. A statistic shows that by executing convicted murderers we are saving from three to eighteen innocent lives. The death penalty serves as a deterrent because without the death penalty there would be a lot more murderers. This is so because a lot of people do not commit murder in fear of the death penalty and those who have committed murder would…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Citizens’ tax money is used by courtrooms to carry out the executions. According to the article, Judge McCartin Turns against Death Penalty by Gordon Dillow explains the execution of inmates is: “It's a waste of time and taxpayers' money.” Judge McCartin acknowledges that, "It cost 10 times more to kill these guys than to keep them alive in prison.” Unfortunately, D.P cases occur a lot since the courtrooms come up with erroneous jurisdiction over inmates’ cases: The judicial system spends taxpayers money in revising documents, evidences, and appeals. For instance, the book Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean compares the prisoners’ execution costs more than life imprisonment in the state of Florida: “the cost of an each execution is approximately $3.18 million, compared to the cost of life imprisonment for (40 years) about $516,000” (129). These quotes assimilate in clarifying that it is cheaper to hold the inmates alive in prison rather than execute prisoners and invest high amounts of money on…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals. Maintaining each death row prisoner cost the taxpayers ninety thousand more per year than a prisoner in a general population. Getting rid of people on death row will save taxpayers a lot more money. It could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals and to keep the less violent criminals in for longer. Getting rid of people who are on a life sentence or on death row will save taxpayers a lot of money which could be spent on other things in…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am against the death penalty, with my knowledge of its pros and cons it seems that the pros are over powered by the cons. Criminals who are facing life in prison, crimes of rape, torture, treason,…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I will be the first to admit that there are people in this world that has done some pretty terrible things. Maybe to themselves or to other people! Even though those people may have no remorse over the things they have done us as human beings have to be the ones to say when enough is enough. The history of the death penalty is a long and brutal one. From the stoning and crucifixion killings of the B.C. era to today’s methods of the electric chair and lethal injection, governments of one kind or another have sentenced people to death for thousands of years [CA Innocence Project, 2009]. It’s simply a disciplinary act that needs to be eliminated. Wouldn’t it be more efficient for Guilty people to sit in jail and live with what they have committed? To think about what they have done day in and day out, to have the world judge them and to know that family and friends has shunned them from their lives, because of the things that they have done in the past. They may not get over it today, maybe not even tomorrow but after a life time of sitting in the jail with nothing and no one, they are more than likely to “break down” and feel the guilt sooner or later. They would not be human if they didn’t, to have to grow old and sit in prison knowing that you won’t ever be able to leave or see sunlight ever again. Knowing that no one’s going to help you, and knowing that that is where you are going to die would be a terrible feeling.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The price that taxpayers have to pay for execution is much lower than the price they have to pay for life in prison. Capital punishment is fair because they have caused so much pain and they deserve the same fate as their victim had. The Death penalty may cause future generations and current generations to view murder differently and teach them a lesson. No one should ever view human life as an object you can just steal from others. The criminal deserves to die for what he did to his victim. That is equal; equal for the criminal, equal for the family, and most of all equal for the…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, the cost of a death penalty court case is tremendous, in comparison to a life sentence case. A Public Defender’s Office in Idaho spent 44 times more time on a death penalty case than a life sentence appeal. Because the time spent on a case directly relates to the cost, giving life sentences instead of the death penalty would be more cost effective for the U.S. government. In addition to this, even people who have done horrible things like murder and treason can contribute to society in a meaningful and positive way. However, society is not able to benefit from these people and may suffer from it. One man, Stanley Tookie Williams, was given a death sentence in 1981 for participation with a brutal gang in which he murdered four people and had two counts of robbery against him. During his time on death row he tried to become a better person. He wrote a series of eight books aimed at children in an attempt to turn them away from gang-violence, an attempt to prevent them from following in his own footsteps. While he filed appeals to get out of his death penalty, he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize multiple times. Despite all of this, he was eventually executed in 2005. His efforts at directing kids to a better path in life show us that even the worst criminals can change, that even the worst criminals can have a positive impact on our lives. If he had more time before execution, who knows how many more…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life In Jail

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases". The process before being executed is much longer. In fact "Some prisoners have been on death row for well over 20 years"(Death penalty.org, 2008). This time on death row can vary, but usually it is more then 10 years (Death penalty.org, 2008). During that time of waiting on death row more and more money is being spent looking into the case to make sure everything is perfect and correct information is there. The amount of money spent on the person that is getting executed is over thousands more by the time the process is done. Executions cost "$2 million per person vs. $500,000 for life in prison without parole. If the death penalty was replaced with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, which costs millions less, more money, could go for things citizen really need. In fact; "the money saved could be spent on programs that actually improve the communities in which we live"(Death penalty, 2008). There are so many good things we could use the extra millions of dollars on including "education, roads, police officers and public safety programs, after-school programs, drug and alcohol treatment, child abuse prevention programs, mental health services, and services for crime victims and their families". All of this should be way more important in the grand schema of things. The state of California alone "could save $1 billion over five years by replacing the death penalty with permanent imprisonment." Having regular prisoners is so much cheaper. "California taxpayers pay $90,000 more per death row prisoner each year than on prisoners in regular…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rogerian Argument

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although arguments from both sides have merit, my opinion is to support capital punishment. It is my belief that the death penalty saves many lives by not giving these people who commit heinous crimes a chance to do it again. Also, the death penalty invokes fear in people who might consider committing certain crimes. The relapse rate of people who commit heinous crimes and are released on parole is astounding. Many of these offenders are back in prison either from a repeat offense or a parole violation within a few years. If these offenders are given life in prison it is using up millions of dollars in taxpayers money to house and feed them. If the government could make the death row process shorter and limit appeals, it would reduce the amount…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death should not be root based off of judgment by other people. The death row not only hurts the inmate but it also has an impact on the economy and families, these are just a few reasons why the death row should be shut down.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, instead of giving criminals the death penalty the justice system they should give them life in prison. The death penalty should be abolished for it not only contradicts the entire on not killing, but also the bible. The same bible both victims and defendants had to put their right hand on to tell they were not going to lie during questioning. While society want these dangerous criminals off the street, capital punishment is not the answer. One huge problem continues to pop up, innocent people die in these cases all the time. Therefore, the system should only give life sentences to dangerous criminals where they will not have television, good food, or freedom. The punishment will come with all the lack of freedom. Families will have justice because they know that the criminal can no longer walk the streets and commit the crime again. While many people may agree with capital punishment, I ask what about the innocent lives of those who lives are taken from them. Remember, you can release an innocent person from prison, but not from the…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Death Penalty

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page

    Life in prison is not a punishment. Not for people guilty of violent murders. They have access to way to many comforts that they do not deserve. When criminals kill, they lose their own rights. They are subjected to whatever punishment that crime is worthy of.…

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays