You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Do you believe society should have the ability to determine if same sex partners should marry? Determining your soul partners should be a privilege for all, such as homosexuals, lesbians, gays, bisexuals etc. and not society. Homosexuals are not abnormal humans, so there is no reason to treat them any different, after all they are citizens who oblige to the same jurisdictions. In the brief article, 8 Is Not Hate: The Meaning of a proposition by Jennifer Roback Morse, Morse explains how marriage is a gender-based institution that attaches mothers and fathers to each other and to their children, but I disagree with her theory of marriage. I believe marriage is based on the love, trust, and the ability to provide for one another. If you were brought into this world as a homosexual then who are you to deny marriage to same sex partners, because although you deny marriage to same sex couples they’re not going to change their beliefs and values just because society does not accept them for who they are. Same sex couples should have the ability to choose their own spouses, without having to deal with ignorant bigots such as those who won’t accept others preferences, because of religious beliefs and values morals. If homosexuals have the same responsibility, consequences, and obligations as straight people then there is no reason to keep marriage away from same sex partner.…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…
- 1093 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the essay " The Case Against Gay Marriage," Manuel Lopez, a gay man himself, contests the idea of allowing gay marriage by relating it to his homosexual experience, and more specifically to the future outlook for the institution of marriage. He takes a passive but safe entrance to his essay by discussing opinion polls and common belief among young people, noting that the main reason high school students will not oppose gay marriage is due to their upbringing in a democracy that stands for equality. He mentions the central idea that gay marriage will mostly affect future generations rather than current ones. His opening, however, shows little support for most of his assumptions and claims. Aside from his lack of supporting evidence, his most notable aspect is his literary tone towards the issue. He shows no anger or…
- 1492 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
A Former US senator and a senior at the Ethics and Public Policy Center begin their case against gay marriage with the point that there are no studies that prove that homosexuals have a positive impact their community. They claim that people that support homosexuals are not “seeing the big picture” or assuming the repercussions of damaging others, including children, morally, religiously, physically, and mentally. When asked about a “go-slow approach,” their rebuttal consists of the idea that once America has gone slow all the way to the conclusion, Americans will be unhappy with the results; it is not worth using the courts. They continue with the statement that what is best for the children is a couple, a heterosexual marriage. “We know it’s…
- 312 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Family plays an important role in marriage and the morals that children are be taught to learn from mistakes their parents made in the past. Although Santorum misused statistics in his article he states, “When liberals, through unelected judges, order us to change this understanding of marriage into something radically different, the result is likely to be dangerous for children and for society” (95). Same-sex marriage can confuse children about the true meaning of marriage which they can be affected by men and women in society. Individuals often look down on children who deal with their sexuality, especially in school. In essence, name-calling, harassments, and bullying can have negative effects on the development and mental stages of the child dealing with their sexuality such as depression, low self-esteem, abuse, and thoughts of suicide. Although parents love their children, parents would try to avoid any conflicts that will harm and danger their child in various ways, including homosexuality. Hence, that can consist of the reasons why families say homosexuality is wrong…
- 1129 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Same sex marriage has been legalized in 38 states. However why have the other 12 states confiscated simple things from homosexuals such as happiness? Raising children is one major concern that has alarmed many people. Mark Regreus, a PhD scholar from Texas university stated “Children raised by same sex parents suffer more difficulty, such as abuse and unemployment in later life” (Regerus, para 3). However, University of Melbourne study shows that “couples score six percent higher than the general population on measures of health, and family cohesion” (2014, para 9). Also having same sex parents causes psychological benefits and it offers kids to have a deeper understanding of diverse people. Children raised by couples of the same sex learn that being different is okay. Many homosexuals face many problems with having child custody in a divorce or separation. Another unjust problem for gays are taxes. Gay couples pay higher taxes than straight couples and they are also not allowed to have any joint tax return. This inequality towards gays must stop now.…
- 793 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Within America, the concept of same-sex marriage has recently been under heavy debate. The growing interest in such has created issues concerning politics, society, morality, religion and civil rights. The conflict itself arises due to an abundance of peoples’ own views on whether same-sex couples should be permitted to enter marriage. The 47% of American people opposed” (Alper, Gideon I.,P.L.) fail to acknowledge that we as human beings have the inalienable right to be granted the gift of marriage. Human rights, obviously, apply to every human, including gays. That is, unless, homosexuals are believed to not be humans and rather creatures of lower importance and intellect.…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
“They are preserving the sanctity of marriage, so that two gay men who've been together for twenty-five years can't get married, but a guy can still get drunk in Vegas and marry a hooker at the Elvis chapel! The sanctity of marriage is saved!” Lea DeLaria states her views on gay marriage. Some although, view this topic very differently, it is seen as a dirty abomination to many that heterosexual marriage is being corrupted by the possibility of homosexual marriage. The year is 2010, yet America has seemed to take a step back in giving everyone and anyone equal rights in today’s society, leading back when America thought it was not a good idea to give African Americans their rights. Is that situation so different from today’s argument of giving homosexuals their rights? Although heterosexual marriages are more acceptable in America today, homosexual relationships as well as marriages need to be respected, not restrained so homosexuals can live freely as they please.…
- 888 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Opponents of same-gender marriage argue that Proposition 8 was overturned because most Americans thought “though homosexuals may believe that they are merely seeking a small expansion of the definition of marriage, the majority of Americans perceive this change as a radical deconstruction of the institution” (Schiffren 192). They argue that with the legalization of same-gender marriage it will destroy the institution of marriage. It is believed that by recognizing civil unions among those who are gay is “a radical redefinition of society’s most fundamental institution” (Schiffren 192). They believe that by recognizing same-gender marriage as a civil union it will require reconstructing the definition of marriage. Proposition 8 prevents same-gender marriages to be recognized in state which prevents gay couples from earning the full benefits that would be earned in a civil union.…
- 1121 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Proposition 8 has stirred up a controversial debate among the citizens in California as well as in the other states of the United States. This argument on same-sex marriage is not only about accepting how the new society had brought, but also about associating with the civil rights movements. Proposition 8 meant more than just a ban on same-sex marriage, it is a battle between the equality among gay couples and the old traditional definition of marriage, a development of love between a man and a woman. The argument over California’s Prop 8 was one of the most expensive running campaigns in the United States, second only to the presidential race. Both sides of the debate have spent millions of bucks into the campaign.…
- 664 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In today’s society there are many controversial issues that people must take a stance on; one of the most controversial is same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is a marriage between two people of the same gender, and many people believe it can have a negative effect on children. However, many people believe it should be allowed because it is based on the same basic principle of hetero-sexual marriage: that two individuals desire to formally live together and have legal rights and privileges, regardless of sexual orientation. While there are people who oppose the legalization of same-sex marriage due to religious beliefs, the possible adverse effects on children, and personal morality, there are many people who believe it should be legalized because every person is created equal and should have the right to the same legal benefits and privileges as well as the opportunity to marry whomever they choose.…
- 2283 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On March 7, 2000, fifty-two out of fifty-eight counties in California voted to keep homosexual marriage illegal; yet gay-activists continue to seek to overturn this legislation. This is unfortunate because the voice of the people has clearly spoken against the legalization of gay marriage. Homosexual marriage should remain illegal because the people of California voiced their opinion very strongly and took a moral stand against this issue, and this type of marriage is not what God had intended.…
- 995 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A battle has been in progress for years over whether equal rights and equal protection against discrimination should be extended to homosexuals. Recently this has expanded into the area of marriage. The topic of homosexual marriages is a prevalent issue today. Even in the nation's capital, representatives are finding ways to make this alliance unlawful. This topic has been debated bringing up many valid points, but the fact of the matter is that homosexual marriages are wrong and we, as a country, should not allow such acts. Marriage is the institution whereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family. Although some same sex marriages may be capable of coping financially, the negative influence on children raised in their household has been statistically proven. Not only would same sex families deal with negative connotations in terms of their children, but also most religions in North America frown upon the union of same sex relationships and restrict marriage to one man and one woman. Many critics hold opposing views, arguing that same sex marriages harm no one and that to deny them the right to marry is unconstitutional.…
- 705 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Smith (2012), gay marriage is often a fault that is based on highly nuanced understandings of the law. First, marriage is not only for the benefits of each other but also for the good of the spouse’s community. Second, the association of gay marriage should not be to desire to learn or value to the authorized strength and explanation of state or federal laws. Third, the fundamental values upon which the nation is built clearly affirm that equality and the pursuit of happiness are the rights and privileges of all citizens, irrespective of their sexual preference or orientation by Smith (2010). Gay spouse cannot give the children a male and female parent for proper development. Gay marriage cannot do anything to take the state interest of propagating society. The difference between male and female is prolonging over anatomy. Gay marriage cannot give…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays