Preview

Prole Pronunciation Report: Orange County Jail

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
993 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prole Pronunciation Report: Orange County Jail
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS JDI-298
PAROLE VIOLATION REPORT Rev. 7/03 INSTITUTION: | APA Nbr. | NAME (Last, First) | REPORT DATE: | PREPARED BY: | PHONE: | Orlando/Orange | 280857 | Machjokowski, Richard | 03/01/2009 | Michelle Thomas | (693)-298-8932 | TYPE OF REPORT: | RECOMMENDATION: | X | TECHNICAL | | FELONY | | Continue Parole- Other Programming | VIOLATION DATE: | ACTION WHICH CONSTITUTED VIOLATION ON THIS DATE: | ARREST DATE: | 02/21/2009 | 23-Failure to Report | 02/21/2009 | 02/21/2009 | 19-Possessing Drug Paraphernalia | 02/21/2009 | 02/21/2009 | 07-Positive Drug Screen |
…show more content…
Violation 2: Parole Officer Thomas can testify that while conducting a home call she found drug paraphernalia on the parolee. Officer Pasztor can also testify to this and has this item in the evidence room of the Orange County Police Department.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS JDI-298
PAROLE VIOLATION REPORT Rev. 7/03
Violation 3: Parole Officer Thomas can testify that the parolee was given a drug screen and it came back positive. The lab results are attached and show that the parolee was tested for marijuana and the test came back with a positive result for marijuana.
In all counts the parolee voluntarily admits to all allegations.
SUMMARY OF
…show more content…
Machjokowski failed to report to Parole Officer Thomas’s office for his weekly meeting and drug test. Mr. Machjokowski was supposed to be in the Parole Officer’s office at eight in the morning. Parole Officer Thomas set out to look for him when subject did not show up at ten in the morning and there was no response on the phone number that had been given. Parole Officer Thomas found him at work. Parolee stated “he woke up to late to meet today and I did not want to lose my job, so I came directly to work”. The Parolee was arrested on site by Officer Pasztor of the Orange County Police Department. Violation 2: On 02/21/2009 Mr. Machjokowski was found to be in possession of drug paraphernalia when Parole Officer Thomas made a home call, due to Mr. Machjokowski not showing up for a weekly meeting. No drugs were found on the subject; however we did find a device used for smoking marijuana on the subject. Officer Pasztor of the Orange County Police has entered this into their evidence room, awaiting any trial, and is willing to testify to this. Violation 3: On 02/21/2009 Mr. Machjokowski was drug tested in accordance with his Parole Order. The test found that Mr. Machjokowski tested positive for marijuana. See attached lab test

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In October 2014 Marvin Beville delivered marijuana to a confidential informant (“CI”). The State has a video recording of the transaction. In December 2014, Beville was charged with Class A misdemeanor dealing in Marijuana and Level 6 felony maintaining a common nuisance.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state of Florida charged Clayton Harris in violation of Florida Statute 893.149(1)(a), (unlawful possession of listed chemical). Harris argued that Officer Wheetley did not have a credible cause to conduct a search. Harris then commenced evidence supporting his position that Aldo was an unreliable drug-detection dog due to another stop made by Officer Wheetley two months later. Aldo again alerted to the driver-side door but Officer Wheetley was unable to recover any illegal drugs. Officer Wheetley testified on behalf of his and Aldo’s training and certification. After hearing Officer Wheetley’s testimony, the trial court concluded that there was probable cause for the search and denied the suppression motion. The Florida First District Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court’s holding.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Study

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home and scanned DLK’s home from outside with a thermal imager which is a device that detects warmth within the home. The results were consistent with the use of heat intensive lights used in growing marijuana indoors and based on the scan and other evidence, the agents were able to obtain a warrant which was used to search the home where they found more than 100 marijuana plants. Within the search and seizure case of DLK, the government did not go too far because they had suspicion, did not invade the privacy of the suspect, and there was danger of loss of evidence.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: In September 2004, New Mexico police officers received a report that Larry Begay, the…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Possession of a controlled drug with the intention of supplying the drug to another person…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    You are a probation officer who was conducting a home visit for probationer Bobby Jean. You walk up to the door, she answers, and you notice a bag of marijuana sitting on the kitchen table. She promises that it is not hers. You provide her with a urine screen and it is clean.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wagner, Benjamin B. Dolan, Jared C. 2012. “Medical Marijuana and Federal Narcotics Enforcement in the Eastern District of California.” Mcgeorge Law Review 43, no. 1: 109-126. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. Teter, C.J., McCabe S.E., LaGrange, K., Cranford, J.A., Boyd, C.J., (2006). Illicit Use of…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, the question that can only be asked is whether this violated the professional code of ethics for correctional officers and as I stated in the previous paragraph if security functions are compromised, the correctional officer's primary objective is to protect the facility. Therefore, lying could be justified as the correctional officer may have been unable to coerce the inmate to reveal where the contraband was located without lying to him. So the bottom line here is that in the scenario it does not state what type of contraband that was being confined but in the prison system, all contraband is considered illegal and is considered to be a danger to all…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Carper, G. T. & McCamey, W. (1989). Drug testing in police agencies. Journal of Contemporary Justice. 5(89). Retrieved November 13, 3008, from SAGEJournals…

    • 2544 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DrugEd2 Fall 2013

    • 2851 Words
    • 27 Pages

    In the text, the highly-publicized drug arrests in Tulia, TX were used to illustrate that…

    • 2851 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * An official application filed by the convicted offender and his or her lawyer for a parole hearing…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    marijuana to the ‘customers’. The court saw this as a form of trafficking and thus charged him…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Investigation

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the forensic test revealing the content of the bags were honey and dried leafs he still made the people think that they were getting drugs. During this undercover investigation as Officer Cline, I would charge the defendant 1 with the intent of buying narcotics. Because the suspect had the intent to purchase drugs from me not knowing that it isn’t drugs. Now, with the defendant 2 I as the officer would charge him with drug offense because he was trying to sale a bag of marijuana and LSD.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Pasco County Sheriff office in Florida received an anonymous tip that marijuana was being grown on respondent property. When an investigating officer discovered that he could not observe from ground level, he circle twice over the property in a helicopter at the height of 400 feet. With his naked eyes he was able to see through the content of the greenhouse roof, and it open sides of what he concluded were marijuana plants. A warrant was obtained based on what the officer had observed, and the ensuing search revealed marijuana growing in the greenhouse. The respondent was charged with possession of that substance under Florida law. The trial court granted his motion to suppress the evidence.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays