Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Profit Maximization

Satisfactory Essays
2684 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Profit Maximization
Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Econ 401 Price Theory

Chapter 19: Profit Maximization Problem
Instructor: Hiroki Watanabe

Summer 2009

1 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
2 / 49

Intro Overview

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Corresponds to Ch5 utility maximization problem.

( )
∗ 1

= ϕ1 (p, m)

p

ϕ(p, m)
∗ 2

= ϕ2 (p, m)

m

3 / 49

Intro Overview

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Q: How many chefs do we need to maximize the profit?
1 2

You’ll have more revenue as your sales increases. Hiring too many chefs will reduce the productivity.

4 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
5 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Definitions

w = (wC , wK ) denotes the factor price (unit price of inputs). The total cost associated with the input bundle (xC , xK ) is TC(xC , xK ) = wC xC + wK xK . The total revenue from y is TR(y) = py or TR(xC , xK ) = pf (xC , xK ).

The economic profit generated by the production plan (xC , xK , y) is π(xC , xK ) = pf (xC , xK ) − wC xC − wK xK .

6 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Definitions

The competitive firm takes output price p and all input prices (w1 , w2 ) as given constants (price taker assumption). Output and input levels are typically flows. (To compute flows, you need to specify a duration of period on which flows are measured. Stock doesn’t require that.) xC = the number of labor units used per hour. y = the number of cheesecakes produced per hour.

Accordingly, profit is usually a flow. Other examples: income (f), GDP (f), capital stock (s), bank balance (s).

7 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Definitions

Fixed Cost Fixed cost is a cost that a firm has to pay for the fixed input. Kayak’s has to pay the rent (wK ) even when y = 0. ¯ Suppose the size of kitchen if predetermined at xK . ¯ FC = wK xK . Fixed cost may or may not be a sunk cost (cost not recouped, regardless of future actions) depending on the timing:
1 2

It is sunk after Kayak’s paid the rent. Not if Kayak’s has not paid the rent.

8 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem

In the short run, the firm solves the short-run profit maximization problem (SPMP): Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem (SPMP) Kayak’s maximizes its short run profit given p, (wC , xK ): ¯ maxxC π(xC , xK ) = ¯ pf (xC , xK ) ¯ −wC xC − wK xK

total revenue total cost ¯ = pf (xC , xK ) − wC xC − FC.

9 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Iso-Profit Line ¯ An Iso-profit line at π contains all the production plans ¯ (xC , xK , y) that yield a profit level of π. We do not care if the production plan is actually feasible. The iso-profit line simply represents the collection of plans that yields the same π. Let’s say xK = 1, wK = 1 and FC = 1 · 1 = 1. π = py − wC xC − FC wC FC + π ⇒ y= xC + . p p Higher π means higher y-intercept. The slope of iso-profit is wC . p ¯ E.g., p = 1, (wC , wK ) = (1, 1) and xK = 1.
10 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Isoprofit 10 9 8 Cheesecakes (y) 7 6
4 6 2 0 −2 −4 8 4 6 2

π=py−wCxC−FC
0

−2

5 4 3 2 1 0 0
0 −2 −4 −6 −8 0 −1 2 0 −2 −4 −6 −8

1

2

3

4 5 6 Chefs (xC)

7

8

9

10
11 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Some of the production plans (xC , xK , y) cannot be chosen (not feasible) because of the technological constraint: y ≤ f (xC , xK ). (1)

Which production plan yields the highest profit level while satisfying (1)? ¯ E.g., y = f (xC , xK ) = 8xC .

12 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Isoprofit 10 9 8 Cheesecakes (y) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1
1 0 −1 −2 −3 −5 −4 3 2 5 6 3 4 2 1 0 −1 −2 −3 1 0 −1 −2 −3 −5 −4 −6 −7 −8 −5 −4 8 7 5 6 3 4 2 1 0 −1 −2 −3

π = py − wC xC − F C √ −7 −6 f(xC , xK ) = 8xC 0 y= ¯ 1 9
−8 − −

2

3

4 5 6 Chefs (xC)

7

8

9

10
13 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Recall:
1

2

¯ The slope of production function when xK = xK denotes the marginal product of xC . The slope of iso-profit is wC . p

¯ Kayak’s profit is maximized at (xC , xK , y) where the production function is tangent to the iso-profit curve. Tangency Condition ¯ At the optimal production plan (xC , xK , y), wC p ¯ = MPC (xC , xK ).

14 / 49

Intro Example

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Example ¯ Suppose p = 1, w = (1, 1), xK = 1 and ¯ y = f (xC , xK ) = 8xC .
1 2

What is the fixed cost? Which production plan maximizes the short-run ¯ profit? (MPC (xC , xK ) = 2 ).
2xC

Tangency condition:

2 2xC

= 1.

15 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Interpretation

What does the tangency condition mean? ¯ = MPC (xC , xK ) ¯ ⇒ wC = pMPC (xC , xK ) ∆y ⇒ ∆TC = p ∆x ∆xC C ⇒ additional cost of hiring a chef = additional revenue. ¯ What if wC > pMPC (xC , xK )? ¯ What if wC < pMPC (xC , xK )? wC p

16 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Interpretation

17 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
18 / 49

Figure:

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Q: How does Kayak’s respond to wage increase or price reduction?

19 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

20 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

21 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP Figure:

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

+ ↑ wC reduces xC and y+ . ↓ p reduces x+ and y+ .
C

Discussion
1

Does the increase in wK affect the optimal production ¯ plan (xC , xK , y)? ¯ Does the increase in xK affect the optimal production ¯ plan (xC , xK , y)?
1 2

2

No effect (profit gets smaller though). Short-run technology changes. The same amount of xC produces more y. xC ↓.

22 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Example ¯ Suppose p = 1, w = (2, 1), xK = 1 and ¯ ¯ y = f (xC , xK ) = 8xC . MPC (xC , xK ) = ¯ optimal production plan (x+ , x , y+ )?
C K 2 2xC

). What is the

23 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Isoprofit 10 9 8 Cheesecakes (y) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1
1 0 −1 −2 −3 −5 −4 3 2 5 6 3 4 2 1 0 −1 −2 −3 1 0 −1 −2 −3 −5 −4 −6 −7 −8 −5 −4 8 7 5 6 3 4 2 1 0 −1 −2 −3

π = py − wC xC − F C √ −7 −6 y = f(xC , xK ) = 9 8xC 10 ¯
−8 − −

2

3

4 5 6 Chefs (xC)

7

8

9

10
24 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Isoprofit 10
5 0

Cheesecakes (y)

5

−5

−1 0

0

4

0 0 0.5

2 Chefs (xC)

−2 0

π = py − wC xC − F C √ y = f(xC , xK ) = 8xC ¯

0

−5

−1

0

−1 5

2

−5

−1 0

−1 5

10
25 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
26 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Long Run A long-run is the circumstance in which a firm is unrestricted in its choice of input levels. Decision-making process in which you can change the size of the store as well as amount of cheese. ¯ xK now becomes xK .

27 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem (LPMP) Given w and p, in the long run, Kayak’s solves max π(xC , xK ) = pf (xC , xK ) − wC xC − wK xK . xC ,xK

The same condition applies to xK : wK p + = MPK (xC , xK ).

28 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Example Kayak’s production function is given by f (xC , xK ) = xC + xK .

Price of a cheesecake is p = 2 and w = (1, 1). MPC (xC , xK ) = MPK (xC , xK ) =
2 1 . xC 1 . 2 xK

+ + What is the optimal long-run production plan (xC , xK , y)?

29 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Isoprofit 5
8 4 6 4 6 4 2

4 Cheesecakes (y)

3
4 2

2 0

2
2 0

0 −2

1
0 −2

−2 π = py − wC xC − wK xK 4 − √ y = xC + 1 −4

0 0

1

2 3 Chefs (xC)

4

5
30 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem

Isoprofit 5
8 6 4

4
6

4

2

Cheesecakes (y)

4

3
4 2

2

0

2
2 0

0 −2

1
0 −2

− py π = 2 − wC xC − wK x−4 K √ y = 1 + xK −4

0 0

1

2 3 Size of Kitchen (xK)

4

5
31 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution

Tangency conditions for long-run profit maximization problem: wC p wK p ⇒ = MPC (xC , xK ) = MPK (xC , xK ).



= wK MPK (xC , xK ) −wC = TRS(xC , xK ). wK

wC

MPC (xC , xK )

32 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution

If Kayak’s fires one chef, they can expand the w kitchen area by wC .
K

If Kayak’s fire one chef, they need to expand the kitchen area by TRS(xC , xK ). The factor market’s idea of chef’s worth coincides with Kayak’s idea of chef’s worth. More details in Ch20: cost minimization problem.

33 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
34 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Change in wC affects xC as well as π. Tangency condition: + pMPC (xC , xK ) = wC . + At each wC , Kayak’s sets xC at which the additional increase in revenue equates wC (factor demand function). Diminishing marginal product: MP (x , x+ ) goes
C C

down as xC increases.

K

35 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

36 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Example + Suppose MPC (xC , xK ) = function is given by
1 . 2 xC

The factor demand 1

wC p

=

.

2

xC

37 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Factor Demand 3 p=1 p=2

Wage (w )

C

1 0.5 0 0

1 Chefs (xC)

3
38 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
39 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

If a competitive firm’s technology exhibits decreasing returns to scale then the firm has a single long-run profit-maximizing production plan.

40 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

41 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Figure:

If a competitive firm’s technology exhibits exhibits increasing returns to scale then the firm does not have a profit-maximizing plan.

42 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

43 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Figure:

An increasing returns-to-scale technology is inconsistent with firms being perfectly competitive. What if the competitive firm’s technology exhibits constant returns-to-scale?

44 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

45 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Figure:

So if any production plan earns a positive profit, the firm can double up all inputs to produce twice the original output and earn twice the original profit. When a firm’s technology exhibits constant returns to scale, earning a positive economic profit is inconsistent with firms being perfectly competitive. A CRS firm is compatible with perfect competition only when firm earns zero profit.

46 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

47 / 49

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

1

2

3 4

5 6 7

Introduction Overview Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Definitions Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Short-Run Profit Maximization Problem Example Interpretation Comparative Statics Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Solution to Long-Run Profit Maximization Problem Tangency Condition & Technical Rate of Substitution Factor Demand Returns to Scale and Profit Mazimization Problem Summary
48 / 49

Figure:

Intro

SPMP

Comparative Statics

LPMP

Factor Demand

Returns to Scale

Σ

Solving profit maximization problem. Comparative statics. Factor demand. Competitive environment and compatible technology.

49 / 49

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    ECO 550 Midterm Exam

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. According to the theory of cost, specialization in the use of variable resources in the short-run results initially in:…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Micro Chapter 10 Notes

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    * Economies of scale – because of technology, economies of scale are extensive; only a few large firms (or, in the extreme, only a single large firm) can achieve low average total costs. When long-run ATC is declining, only a monopolist can produce any particular output at minimum total cost…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS ECON1202/2291 QUANTITATIVE MEHODS A FINAL EXAMINATION SESSION 2 2008…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Figure 9.6 The P = MC rule and the competitive firm’s short-run supply curve.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Basic Concepts 1. The relationship between the quantity of output (such as wheat, steel, or automobiles) and the quantities of inputs (of labor, land, and capital) is called the production function. Total product is the total output produced. Average product equals total output divided by the total quantity of inputs. We can calculate the marginal product of a factor as the extra output added for each additional unit of input while holding all other inputs constant. 2. According to the law of diminishing returns, the marginal product of each input will generally decline as the amount of that input increases, when all other inputs are held constant. 3. The returns to scale reflect the impact on output of a balanced increase in all inputs. A technology in which doubling all inputs leads to an exact doubling of outputs displays constant returns to scale. When doubling inputs leads to less than double (more than double) the quantity of output, the situation is one of decreasing (increasing) returns to scale. 4. Because decisions take time to implement, and because capital and other factors are often very long lived, the reaction of production may change over different time periods. The short run is a period in which variable factors, such as labor or material inputs, can be easily changed but fixed factors cannot. In the long run, the capital stock (a firm's machinery and factories) can depreciate and be replaced. In the long run, all inputs, fixed and variable, can be adjusted. 5. Technological change refers to a change in the underlying techniques of production, as occurs when a new product or process of production is invented or an old product or process is improved. In such situations, the same output is produced with fewer inputs or more output is produced with the same inputs. Technological change shifts the production function…

    • 4703 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super study guide2 MIS 373

    • 2143 Words
    • 11 Pages

    - Goal: To achieve a match between the long-term supply capabilities and the predicted level of long-term demand…

    • 2143 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Problem Set 1

    • 543 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consider an economy with the following aggregate demand (AD) and short-run aggregate supply (SRAS) schedules. Decision-makers have previously made decisions anticipating that the price level during the current period will be P105.…

    • 543 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    iPhone 5c vs iPhone 5s

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In today’s economy, citizens have certain wants and needs in our to satisfy or sustain their lifestyles. For example, cell phones today are practically a enormous need by any citizen not only in America but throughout the world. By evaluating the production possibilities curve for the iPhone 5c and the iPhone 5s, I expected the cost benefit analysis would favor towards the iPhone 5c. However, I underestimated the utility of iPhone manufacturing and how much it actually cost to build, sell and profit from the iPhone 5c. Apple Inc. also has to consider their marketing as well, to insure their product sells across the globe to receive marginal benefit.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The market demand at the beginning is D1, and its corresponding marginal revenue is MR1. The initial ATC is ATC1, and the original supply is MC1. Therefore,the monopolist sells 15 units at $20 per unit, and his/her total profit is $5. After a given time period, due to investment and technological advances, which cost the monopolist an increase in TFC, results in a cost of production decrease to ATC2 and its corresponding supply to MC2. The monopolist, then, in the absence of price regulation by the government, would like to produce 15 units and charge a unit price of $25. However, due to quality improvements and effective advertising, the demand increases to D2, while its corresponding marginal revenue is MR2, with ATC2 and MC2 remaining unchanged. The monopolist, therefore, produces and sells approximately 15 units at $55 per unit. His/her total profit is now approximately $50.…

    • 209 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this article, the bagel industry closely resembles a constant cost industry. A constant cost industry is a perfectly competitive industry that gives a horizontal long run industry supply curve. The slope for this supply curve is infinity. The expansion of the industry causes no change in the production cost. The entry of new firms, driven by an increase in demand doesn’t affect the long run average cost curve which can be seen in the article and will be discussed later on. As a result, the minimum efficient scale does not change. This means that the marginal cost of producing another bagel is equal the average cost of producing that bagel. The primary reason for a constant cost industry is that the increase in demand has little impact on the production cost as new firms can easily enter the market and obtain resources at constant prices.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tocker, R. (November 26, 2013) Econ 212 2 203 3 [chat 4]. Retrieved from Colorado Technical University Virtual Campus. ECON212-1304B-02. Principles of Microeconomics: https://campus.ctuonline.edu…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Test Factory Case Study

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This models is developed through application of statistical techniques of arriving at core and flexible part of demand.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Department of Finance, School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China Graduate School of Commerce and Management, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, 186-8601 Tokyo, Japan c Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, 186-8601 Tokyo, Japan d School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China Received 17 April 2005; accepted 26 September 2005…

    • 9252 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Open Source Software

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Concept Review:    Opportunity cost (economic cost): value of the best alternative use of resources. Isocost line: plots capital and labour combinations requiring the same total expenditure. Maximizing profits requires economic efficiency; that is, choosing the lowest-cost way to produce a given level of output. Equivalent ways to do this: (1) use the combination if inputs on the isoquant that is on the lowest isocost line touching the isoquant; (2) choose the input combination where the relevant isoquant is tangent to an isocost line; and (3) pick capital and labour so that MPL/w = MPK/r. Long-run average cost curve: the lower bound of all the short-run average cost curves. Its shape is tied closely to returns to scale. Economies of scale: long-run average costs fall as output rises. Diseconomies of scale: long-run average costs rise as output rises. Economies of scope: less expensive to produce goods jointly than separately.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corresponding author: Lourdes Moreno Martín, Departamento de Fundamentos de Análisis Económico I, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223 Madrid. E-mail: lmoreno@ccee.ucm.es…

    • 13903 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Powerful Essays