Preview

Principles Of King's Notion Of Nonviolence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Principles Of King's Notion Of Nonviolence
King’s notion of non violence had six key principles. He believed that nonviolence was the sole solution that “cured society’s evil and create a just society.” He was not necessarily against the whites, unlike Malcolm, but rather wanted to unify the population. His first principle was that one can resist evil without resorting to violence. According to King, the passion of a nonviolent protester is equivalent to the passion of a violent protester. The second principle mentioned that nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding of the opponent.” The purpose was not to humiliate the individual but to amalgamate the people, resulting in redemption and reconciliation instead of bitterness and chaos that came from violent resistance. …show more content…
The fourth principle spoke about those who committed non violence, stating that they must be willing to suffer without retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive. Nonviolence required the willingness to suffer. According to King, the end was the most important. Therefore if suffering was accepted, it lead to “tremendous educational and transforming possibilities.” Also, non violence is a powerful tool in changing the minds of opponents. In the fifth principle, he discusses on how his plan avoids “external physical violence” and “internal violence of spirit.” He stated that a “nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him.” Instead, the resistor should be motivated by love in the sense of the Greek word ‘agape’. Agape means understand or “redeeming good will for all men.” Nonviolent resistance was that the “universe was on the side of justice” and resistors, doing justice, have a “cosmic companionship” with God who is on the side of trust. God played a significant role in King’s life as he was raised by a Baptist father, and he wanted the same for his supporters. The final principle adds on to the fifth point stating that a nonviolent resister must have a “deep faith in the future.” This principle stems from the conviction that “the universe is on the side of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Letter from Birmingham Jail King addresses the need for non violent direct action and how it could end the fight against segregation. King states, “since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, it is rather strange and paradoxical to find us consciously breaking laws” (Austin 207). By breaking the law to reach a just and moral goal was Machiavellian on King's part because he was doing what it took to achieve the end of segregation. Though King is against breaking the law he knew that needed to be done for segregation to end and that called for ignoring unjust laws by non violent direct action.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bobby Seale was born on the 22nd of October 1936 in Dallas, Texas. He was the first born in a family of three. Seale grew up dug in destitution with an injurious father, and the family brought their battles with them when they moved the nation over to California. Seale went to Berkeley High School, and it was amid this period that he began to end up politically minded. Seale served in the United States air force and later joined the Merritt College in Oakland, California.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King was influenced by the works of Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau. He studied his work while at Morehouse, and was impressed with his concept of civil disobedience (McElrath & Andrews, 2007). King was intrigued by the possibilities of Thoreau’s method. Thoreau stated that it was better to “break the law than to participate in the injustice toward another person” (McElrath & Andrews, 2007).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The principle I want to focus on is number four, this principle is that nonviolence is a willingness to accept violence if necessary, but never inflict it. I think principle number four is the most important because it is what Martin Luther King Jr. stood for in his peaceful protest and such. He stood for nonviolence and to never inflict violence back in his protests. I think that principle number four is about nonviolence and not inflicting it on anyone even if they inflict it toward you. I think this principle is important because it's what Martin Luther King stood for in his peaceful protest and is what he was known for, his peaceful and nonviolent protest.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King explains that he traveled to Birmingham to participate in non-violent protest against segregation, stating “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (289). King responds to the clergy by saying, “your statement… fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations” (289). King continues by explaining the four basic steps of non-violent direct-action, which are: “collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct-action” (290). While providing great detail on the situation and steps taken, King continues to build his argument against the statements made by the clergy.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Society must protect the robbed, and punish the robber” (King 4). This is yet another statement from King that screams logic. Unfortunately, parts of society back then did not possess the logical capacity to comprehend this concept. In the days when segregation ran rapidly, society decided to throw innocent African American victims away in a putrid jail cell while allowing the real criminals to walk freely. King saw the major flaw in this logic, and marked it down in his letter. In sum, he insisted that society should assist those in need, and punish those who harm others in the name of…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings compassion was directed to all communities and states, not just his own. King states, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King), and, “Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly” (King). King uses these statements in order to gain a connection with everyone in the United States and that no one person is to be considered as an outsider. King uses theses quotes, with an attempt to gain Unity among blacks, whites, cities and states.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King strategically breaks down and characterizes acquiescence as a form of dealing with oppression. Through his analysis, King explains how people surrender to oppression and become accustomed to it as a way of living. Creating an atmosphere where the oppressed person learns to live in with oppression and never fully understands what self respect is. ?Religion reminds everyman that he is his brother?s keeper . . .To accept injustice or segregation passively is to say to the oppressor that his actions are morally right.? (King). Therefore, King believes that this lets the oppressor know that their actions are right influencing the oppressor to continue. Dr. King takes into consideration that this is not the best way to deal with oppression. In fact, he criticizes the people who utilize this method. ?To accept passively and in just system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor.?(King) Violence, as a method of dealing with oppression that Dr. King strongly diverges with. King assumes that people who resort to violence also influence hatred at the same time. He explains how violence only creates temporary results. Although at times it may be seen as the best way out but he believes that no one should ever degrade themselves to that level of understanding and standard. According to King, violence only creates problems instead of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King And Lao-Tzu

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the other hand Dr. King strongly believe in taking action. But in a non-violent way of course. His motto was to rise as a leader, take charge and make a difference. Non-violent resistance was his was of rebelling. This was opposite from Lao-Tzu, because he believe that no man should be oppressed. Meaning that if there was injustice it should be left un dealt with. Protesting to Lao-Tzu was pointless, any type of physical action was. Where as…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Time For Outrage Analysis

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Violence to non-violence can make a huge impact on social matters, because it limits the amount of chaos that can occur. The smallest things like making a small group to protest on a social issue, or even making posters to help make a difference, are very useful examples of non-violence. Hessel’s argument towards non-violence is, “It is along this path that humanity will clear its next hurdle… or say that “violence doesn’t work” is much more important than to know whether or not to condemn those who have recourse to it. In this notion of “working,” of effectiveness, lies a nonviolent hope.” Hessel believes that the past shows how violence solved nearly nothing and created a merely violent world, therefore it is our turn to show our non-violent actions and solutions to making a difference. The younger generation shows their non-violent side through volunteer work, and creating small organization to make changes in their community. It may not seem as powerful as what the older generation was used to, but it is a step forward. Even though nonviolence is a great solution, violence may still occur, because it takes one person to make chaos. It’s okay for violence to happen when its make your words be known, for example the civil rights movement and the women’s suffrage movement. They were violent movements that made a huge difference,…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the various factions of the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr. is not an extremist; however, in response to being labeled an extremist by "fellow clergimen", King considers himself an extremist of love and equality (King 1). In his letter written from the Birmingham Jail, King argues in favor of non- violence, placing his extremism in the context of religion, history and sociology. His ideology is the only outlet for a positive and peaceful outcome because the "do – nothinghism of the complacent" will fuel "the hatred and despair of the black nationalist" (King 7).…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    me myself and I

    • 1314 Words
    • 14 Pages

    presupposition of our faith, and the manner of our action. Nonviolence as it grows from Judaic-Christian…

    • 1314 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living by this moral principle can cause a greater harm by turning the other cheek than by using force to deminish a greater threat. There is always going to be people seeking out power or people who have different beliefs and morals because it is engraved within ourselves through generation after generation. Jan Narveson directly states a pacifists view, "His belief is not only that violence is evil but also that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. We are aggressive and greedy people and to change the thinking of the entire world with out the threat of force seems nearly impossible. Hypathetically, if pacifism was put into law, the use of any type of force will be breaking the law and the sentence is life in prison. Now imagine if a man breaks into a house of a young lady and rapes this lady and then pulls a gun out to shoot her. If the woman grabs the gun and shoots the man, she would also be sent to prison for life because any use of force is labelled as unacceptable. In our society today, violence is happening everyday even though we have laws in place to minimize them. Violence is not only a thing of the past but it is a thing of the future and without a proper punishment, violence will increase drastically. Narveson communicates a second version of pacifism where " one might argue that pacifism is desirable as a tactic: that as a matter of fact, some good end, such as the reduction of violence itself , is to be achieved by 'turning the other cheek'. " This again is a good theory, but if it was put into action, the consequences would be great. A human has the right to defend themselves, or help a person that is in need. In war it is the same thing but instead of one person needing help, it is a population worth of needed help. A person claiming they are a pure hearted pacifist by " turning the other cheek" does not necessarily make it the best…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to King, truth is universal and human society and each person is oriented to the just sense of order of the universe (Schulke & Fernandez, 2012). These values include the moral arc of the universe swaying in the direction of justice. Religion has also played an important role in enacting nonviolence when a peaceful result is the ultimate, and desired outcome.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Violence is the only effective weapon available to the people who are oppressed. How far do you agree or disagree?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays