Preview

Violence: Nonviolence and Martin Luther King

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violence: Nonviolence and Martin Luther King
Violence is the only effective weapon available to the people who are oppressed. How far do you agree or disagree?
I personally do not agree that violence is the only effective weapon available to the oppressed people. It is not the only way for people to get their view across or secure their rights and justice. However, throughout the history of mankind, violence has been widely used as a method to gain control over a person or a group of people or a nation. Unfortunately, the present day media is also filled with news of violence. What exactly is violence? Violence can be described as an act of intentional harm to some individual or group. Violence can be physical, mental or sometimes even emotional. It disturbs peace and harmony in the society and slows down the overall development. Securing ownership over land and resources, power hungry leadership, extremism, racism, sociocultural differences, ethnic and caste conflicts are causes of violence. For example, the violence between the Indians and the Pakistanis over the land of Kashmir is motivated by the desire of securing land and resources. The conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is driven by religious differences and extremism. There are constant fights between different tribes in many parts of Africa. These African tribal conflicts are usually motivated by ethnic and caste differences. Centuries prolonged conflicts between the "blacks" and the "whites" were the results of racism. There are still residues of similar conflicts in different corners of the world. Adopting peaceful methods of protestation for making your voice heard have positive impacts on obtaining lasting peace. For example, in South Africa, the white minority apartheid government ruled over the ethnic black majority. They used cruel violent methods to oppress ethnic blacks. However, the African National Congress chaired by Nelson Mandela insisted for peaceful reconciliation with apartheid. In the referendum held on 17 March

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dr. King was a great man he marched for freedom, he protested peacefully so that the black could vote, and most importantly he had a dream that the nation will rise up to its true meaning. He also had a dream that his 4 kids would not be judged by their color but by their character. He really wanted freedom to ring out all across the world. During the march they mad many mistakes by using violence. Jimmie Lee Jackson was killed in a restaurant. They wanted to have a war with major. Dr. King led a march against Governor. George C. Wallace that included 1/3 whites. Later that night a priest was killed for marching with the blacks. 5months later J.L.B signed the voting rights act of 1965. Martin L. King led the American Civil Rights Movement for…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although, there are many methods of non-violence, people choose to be violent in this world. My personal experience with violence is a personal conflict that I had seen when I was in Nepal (civil war) I used saw six to ten deaths every day, neighbors used carried dead bodies by my doorway. I live with these scary minutes in my mind. Gandhi said “Nonviolence cannot act…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him." Not always do we need to use violence to express how we feel. Anger, people tend to use violence, but I believe that communication is necessary. Communication would help everyone throughout the world.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When MLK talks about the “end” I believe he is talking about a conclusion to any situation. Whether it is death or the resolution of a conflict, the end can either be good or bad. In one of King’s action programs should always be nonviolent, in turn leading to a just and pure endings. When we take war for example, the end is undeniably going to end with the loss of soldiers and innocent people fighting for their countries, but had the countries taken the nonviolent approach, then many lives are saved. Take the current War on Iraq for example, 4500 lives would be saved, and over 32,000 wounded wouldn’t be. I know that sounds farfetched and unfair to make that statement but it is the ugly truth. War is a prime…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr's type of activism makes the most sense to use in 1960s America. My reason for thinking this is because Malcolm X's type of activism would have further deepened the gap between blacks(like myself) and whites. The racism would've only worsened had Malcolm's way of activism been chosen. The racist whites see us blacks as animals, and if we resorted to violence because of it, we'd only be proving them right. King's activism, however, taught us to ignore the insults thrown at us and not give them the reaction they expect from…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonviolent struggle has been utilized countless times throughout the history of civilization. Contrary to popular belief, many of the world’s greatest wars are fought free of violence. Nonviolent actions offer an alternative approach to conflict resolution; one that does not resort to literal war and prevents blood shedding. The motivation behind these struggles vary, but the desired outcome is always to promote or prevent a change. Conflicts are diverse, and typically they are concerned with social, economic, ethnic, religious, national, humanitarian, and political matters (Sharp, 2005, p. 15).…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Jr Non Violence

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the article, Martin Luther King Jr.’s Last March, by National Archives, and the excerpts from his famous speech, “I have been to the mountain top”, it shows that he pushed for non violent changes because he spoke with leaders of the opposing sides, gave a famous speech, and stated that it is either nonviolence or nonexistence. The thought of violence disturbed Martin Luther King Jr., and made him very tired and weary. He made many attempts throughout his life to stop the violence because he believed if the violence continued, there would be nothing left.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr help to change a part of the world by practicing non-violent protest. King want to make an impact on the problem of segregation so he tried to protest in one of the most segregated place in the United States. So he went to Birmingham, Alabama to lead a nonviolent protest( Martin Luther King Jr). He also joined other civil rights leaders to walk an historical march called March to Washington. Near the Lincoln Memorial King made a speech called “ I Had a Dream Speech” which said all men of different race will become brothers someday. King fellow minister Ralph Abernathy, and Alabama’s state chairman of the NAACP called a public meeting to order. King said to African Americans to bus boycott until they end segregated seating.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr is a Baptist minister and social activist. He led the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S in the 1950’s.Supporters have said he is amazing leader and his speeches are very motivational. Martin Luther King a Baptist minister and Civil-rights activist, had impact on race relations in the U.S. Martin Luther King was a great leader who had very motivational speeches and never gave up to make people equal.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In history, there have been many speeches made to promote violence to target specific race and/or culture. As a responds to those speeches,…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Time For Outrage Analysis

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Violence to non-violence can make a huge impact on social matters, because it limits the amount of chaos that can occur. The smallest things like making a small group to protest on a social issue, or even making posters to help make a difference, are very useful examples of non-violence. Hessel’s argument towards non-violence is, “It is along this path that humanity will clear its next hurdle… or say that “violence doesn’t work” is much more important than to know whether or not to condemn those who have recourse to it. In this notion of “working,” of effectiveness, lies a nonviolent hope.” Hessel believes that the past shows how violence solved nearly nothing and created a merely violent world, therefore it is our turn to show our non-violent actions and solutions to making a difference. The younger generation shows their non-violent side through volunteer work, and creating small organization to make changes in their community. It may not seem as powerful as what the older generation was used to, but it is a step forward. Even though nonviolence is a great solution, violence may still occur, because it takes one person to make chaos. It’s okay for violence to happen when its make your words be known, for example the civil rights movement and the women’s suffrage movement. They were violent movements that made a huge difference,…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    People also claim violence is a necessary choice. This is only because people cannot imagine or hope for other options. The best time to stop violence is preventing it from happening in the first place. The way to prevent it is to promote justice. Creating a culture of peace is a crucial part to advocate justice. The church teaches individuals have a right to defend themselves- with limited violence only if necessary. The final way to prevent further violence is to reconcile broken relationships. Doing so will break the spiral of violence, and will lead to a peaceful society (Waging…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non Violent Resistance

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chenoweth and Stephan's arguments and research show that non violent campaigns are more successful than violent campaigns against violent political regimes. Though violent protests can show to be successful and they do get the point across though in a very different way, non violent protests I will have to agree, are the best and most efficient way to go about combating a violent opposition. With cases such as Dr. Martin Luther King, and Ghandi being two of the most noted cases. (not to say that there are not many more)…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if Great Britain did not declare war on colonists, would it have pushed them even harder to fight, peacefully that is or use violence for their right to become a self-governing nation? Without violence conducted on by peace, would any movements be ignited? In some cases yes, violence is acceptable for social change. More things have changed throughout history by violence then peaceful protest has ever done. Also, peace will eventually turn to violence. Violence will be viewed as acceptable to some and evil to others.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays