Preview

Preventing a Brave New World; Cloning of Human Embryos

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Preventing a Brave New World; Cloning of Human Embryos
Preventing a Brave New World |

Abstract Leon Kass’s provides a compelling article on why the world should ban cloning. Kass’ article, “Preventing a Brave New World”, provides Kass’ theories of if society progresses on its current path, society would start to turn to cloning as an alternative to typical reproduction. Cloning offers a way to design an offspring rather than the typical experience of child raising. Kass believes if cloning is not banned, society will be more dependent upon technology and be at technologies whim.

Preventing a Brave New World In "Preventing a Brave New World", Leon Kass concludes that reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos is unethical. He provides several thoughts as to why and how he has reached this decision. Kass believes the progression with technologies and the advancement of cloning has its root cause in the evolution of man and the ideals of the future man; to receive “instant gratification.” If man can utilize science to produce a perfect child (a child without illness, birth defects, mental instabilities, etc.), man will utilize this process to benefit themselves and damn the consequences. The general consensus of human cloning is generally faced with disgust. The public opinion of cloning is generally unpopular and is not faced favorably. Because of the unpopular opinion of cloning, there is not much pressure from opposition to allow cloning. It is believed that once science evolved to the point where scientists could successfully engineer an offspring that was perfect and designed by a “parent”, the public opinion of cloning might change. With the public opinion of cloning changed, it may spell certain disaster for the human race. Kass believes this is a possibility because of the mindset of society today. With the instant gratification attitude of society, people are more apt to custom design a child rather that conceiving a child “the old fashioned way”. Kass sees that this



References: Kass, L. R. (2009). Preventing a Brave New World. In M. E. Winston, & R. E. Edelbach, Society, Ethics, and Technology (pp. 317-329). Belmont: Wadsworth .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Kass mentions his four different objections of why cloning should not be performed and the reason they should completely stop researching and experimenting. On the first premises he mentions that it’s an unethical experimentation on the unborn. His reason behind this statement is that it is unethical and too risky to perform such experiment on the unborn child. Mr. Kass mentions that less than 2-3% of cloning attempts succeeded. Moreover, many of the cloned animals that did survive were born with deformities like cows with heart and lung problems and animals not reaching their normal developmental milestone. It is without much doubt that cloning humans would begin on a trial in error. A scientist discovered that a nucleus of an unaltered egg is formed and arranged through months or years as in an altered egg it must reprogram within minutes or hours. Thus, this is why there is a high chance of developmental defects. Mr. Leon E. Kass doesn’t believe in this type of research and believes strictly that cloning should not be permitted because of its unethical experimentation to the unborn child. His second premises, he makes it clear that it threatens identity and Individuality. The reasons behind this statement are that clones, as he mentions, would experience concerns about their own self and appearance; being identical to another person whose genotype is the same. Moreover, He mentions about issues with mixing parents with twin relation and the issues of having too…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pulitzer Prize winner and renown columnist, Charles Krauthammer, analyzes the controversial topic of cloning; providing readers with an ethical perspective via explicit research and inquiry in his academic article, “Crossing Lines.” Taking an intellectual and pensive approach as he examines noteworthy ethical concerns beginning with the least complex—like the principle belief that life begins at conception; thus, the manipulation of an embryo is intentional disfiguration and maltreatment of an underdeveloped child—to the far more convoluted—such as applying the commandant, “thou shalt not kill” to the possibly of embryo mass production in the near future; where embryos will be readily disposed of once they’ve served their purpose. Krauthammer…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Couples who are battling with infertility can benefit from human cloning. By having a cloned cell implanted into a mother’s uterus, she can possibly have a child that she could not have had through natural procreation. Human cloning can give infertile couples a biological child who received genes from one or both parents. Those who are advocates for reproductive cloning generally give three reasons: The goodness of human freedom, existence, and well-being. People believe that human cloning for reproduction purposes is not making themselves free, but that they are free to practice human cloning. They want to the ability to decide based on their own moral values what is right and wrong with having a cloned child. The goodness of existence has people advocating for the potential cloned child. People argue that once the cloned child is born it would “prefer existence as a clone to no existence at all (PCBE).” No one can verify that the child would believe that statement once they are old enough to think for themselves. The final argument for human cloning is for the goodness of well-being. This argument is for using human cloning to help infertile couples to have a biological child. Other people argue that the well-being is to benefit the genetic quality of the next generation by ensuring that all diseases and disorders that the child may inherit are removed…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Would it be so bad to have a world were all is good, no disease, famine, or illness; everyone is the epitome of their father and mother eyes and all those living in a world where cloning the norm. There are those in the here and now who see cloning, in all it facets, as a good and wonderful thing, to be done by all, if your hearts so desires. "Some among us are delighted, of course by the this state of affairs: some scientist and biotechnologist, their entrepreneurial backers, and a cheering claque of sci-fi enthusiast, futurologists, and libertarians (Winston & Edelbach, 2009)."…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kass's Argument Analysis

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, all of Kass’s objections make valid point on why cloning us unethical in our current society. The objections can be seen as premature thoughts because we are not living in the actual era of cloning. Cloning is still very experimental and we do not know all the benefits and effects of cloning. Therefore, some of Kass’s arguments can be ruled out. Even if cloning is improved and become beneficial one question that will remain is, is it ethical to…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…

    • 3138 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Cloning

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the past years research took embryonic stem cells from an aborted embryo to get materials to study. In this case the issue arises that stem cell research may be used to clone. There are many arguments about the use of stem cells. The biggest fear of cloning arose in 1997 with the cloning of Dolly a sheep which was created through cloning stem cells. This sheep put a scare on society that scientist may want to clone a human child, this was a misperception by society. Genetic determinism aroused the fears that genes determine all aspects of an individual; this reflects a person’s genes are a simple relationship of psychological and physical traits. This brought forth the fear of “Playing God” and the interference of natural elements of life.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thousands of people each year die because of organ shortages. Cloning human organs can eliminate this epidemic. If organs can be specially made for each individual who needs one, organ transplant waiting lists can be eliminated. “...An average of 18 people die each day waiting for transplants that can 't take place because of the shortage of donated organs”(“The Need Is Real: Data”). These deaths can be prevented by cloning. However, many people believe that cloning is very unethical and goes against religion. This hinders the formation of cloning and holds back scientists from imperative research. The lack of support given by the people for cloning research impedes government and local funding and aid. The delay in funding and aid creates a rift in research. Many people support biomedical technology and cloning, but only to a certain extent. Most religious people are concerned about cloning because they believe that only God has the right to give and take life in any form. In reality, fear and the lack of knowledge inhibit many religious and ethical people from supporting the idea of cloning. “If we hope to direct the course of this powerful technology, we should strive to learn as much as we can about these molecular tools and then let scientists and corporations know our wishes. Only then can we truly expect to avoid the risks and enjoy the…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff that will determine what if any, impact that cloning will have upon our ever-changing society. Each side has compiled substantial evidence against the other as to why cloning should or should not be legalized and practiced. It is my strong belief that the curative effects that could be reaped by practicing cloning far outweigh the arguments of anti-cloning advocates; the practice of human cloning should be legalized and practiced. Countless individuals could benefit from its various applications and the future of medicine would be drastically enhanced.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays