Preview

Posohkov Poverty And Wealth: An Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Posohkov Poverty And Wealth: An Analysis
Eighteenth century Russia, peasants made up the majority of Russia’s population. Peasants are accounted for the industrial lands owned by merchants and the nobility. The peasants in Russia have been treated as animals where they were bought and sold by the nobility. With the abundant of peasants in Russia, orders had been placed and enforced by the tsar and state officials to maintain this population. Some of these orders describes the purchases and regulations of peasants.
In the online reading titled, Posohkov Poverty and Wealth, Ivan Tikhonovich became an admirer of Peter the Great for his efforts to modernized Russia. Tikhonovich was a self-taught peasant who was involved with the governmental services. With his services to the government, he became aware of the corruptions in Russia. He had written a book called, A Book on Poverty and Wealth, that describes what the government and the tsar should do to improve the prosperity of Russia. Tikhonovich writes about how the merchants are significant to the economy of Russia and to not reduce the numbers of merchants but to increase the numbers. Merchants and military work side by side to ensure the well-being of each other. Military and merchants cannot exist without the existence of one another.
…show more content…
In Catherine II accession to the throne, she had increased the number of serfdom which lead to the Pugachev Rebellion in 1773 to 1774. This rebellion was led by a man name Emelian Pugachev who claimed to be Peter III. In this rebellion, Pugachev promised the peasants freedom to the lower levels of the Russian society. The rebellion was eventually put down by Catherine II’s military. Catherine II rational to put this rebellion down was the lies Pugachev had told and deceiving he peasants by claiming he was Peter III. So, to ensure the peace be restored in Russia, she had to put down the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Peter the third- was retarded but his wife Catherine the great(german born princess) took throne. She used pugachev’s rebellion as an excuse to extend the powers of the centralized government in regional affairs.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, there was increasing criticism of the institution of serfdom. The Russian empire had, since the reign of Ivan III, been a largely serf based rural nation. 85% of the populations at this time were peasants and most of those, serfs. A serf was someone who was owned by the Land lord, usually a member of the nobility, the serf would work there land until there death, with very little freedoms and certainly no education.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whap Chapter 18 Hrt

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Serfdom of Russia: Serfs were not given many rights, but were used for labor on the large lands the powerful leaders and people of the time had…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ch 18 21 22 ap world vocab

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Why significance: added new lands to Russia, encouraged science, art, literature, Russia became one of Europe's most powerful nations.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His increasing need for resources caused him to suppress the peasants more and more under his reign. Not only were the peasants affected, but also the middle-class and the nobility, which lost most of their power under the growing absolutism of Peter the Great. In another words, Peter controlled the nobility with the army, the peasantry with the whip. Peasants fared the worst under Peter's reign though. Their taxes increased threefold under Peter's reign to pay for a growing military expenditure and almost had to work six days without pay. Serfs were arbitrarily assigned to work in factories in towns, breaking up the central Russian unit of the family. Like Louis the XIV of France by crushing the power of the nobility, and reducing peasants to serfs, Peter was able to make his government powerful and…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter had returned from his journey through Europe, but Something troubled the tsar. The country he had left now seemed to the tsar not fitting to his persona and to the day and age. He felt that the people, ideas, religion, education, and government where all centered around ancients teaching. No place or person wanted to modernize or become better , to become like the people he had meet in his travels. Peters Russia sadly was to old and stuck in her ways, she was not even close enough to the standards of her brothers in Europe.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He enacted reforms, changed the class system, and modernized his military,but he did so at a cost. Peter’s mission for westernization was more for himself than his people. Because of his needs and costly reforms the peasantry struggled. “ Peasants made up 97 percent of Russia’s population… they became tied down in a system bordering on slavery”( Sherman 406). They were forced to pay these taxes enacted by Peter with money they did not have. They were forced to be slaves for nobility, a concept that sets Russia back into the Medieval ages. Even though Peter the Great helped Russia into the modern world, at the cost of the peasants. Causing historians to question if Peter’s ends justified the…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Massie, author of Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman considers Pugachev’s revolt “the most serious challenge to Catherine’s authority during her reign”. This rebellion became a turning point in her rule, as she gave up on freeing the serfs and focused on the nobility, who didn’t try to overthrow her. She was still against serfdom, but realized that a multitude of other changes, including educating the nation, had to be made before Russia was prepared. Although her decision to ignore Pugachev in the early stages allowed for the rebellion to turn into the disaster it was, she redeemed herself in the choices she made after his arrest. She stuck with her ideals against torture and encouraged the nobles to treat their serfs and peasants humanely.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, she worked hard to bring the sophisticated culture of Western Europe to backward Russia. She imported western architects, sculptures, musicians, and intellectuals. Catherine patronized the philosophies and bought master pieces of western art. When the French government banned the Encyclopedia, she offered to publish it in St. Petersburg. With these countless actions, Catherine won good press in the west for herself and for Russia. Peter the Great westernized the Russian armies, but it was Catherine who westernized the thinking of the Russian nobility. Catherine’s second goal was domestic reform, and she began her reign with sincere and ambitious projects. One major concern of hers was for there to be better laws. Catherine appointed a special legislative commission to prepare a new law code. No new unified code was ever produced, but Catherine did restrict the practice of torture and allowed limited religious toleration. She also attempted to improve education and strengthen the local government. The philosophies applauded her measures and hoped for more to follow. In 1773 a violent and bloody revolt of the serfs occurred. Catherine’s noble-led army was able to end it, but the event was a turning point in the empress’s domestic policy. Catherine had condemned serfdom, but the revolt put an end to any thoughts she may have had of reforming society. The peasants were dangerous and the nobles were her…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is poverty really immutable according to an article titled 4 myths about poverty by David B. Grusky, he explains 4 myths people have believed about poverty for many years. One myth he talked about was is poverty immutable. A second myth he talked about was is poverty a natural outcome of a competitive economy. The third myth he talked about was is full employment policies to costly to consider. Finally the last myth he talked about was poverty is just too complicated to understand. Are any of these myths really proven.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was Catherine's reforms that led Russia into the age of enlightenment. During the time of her reign, over 1/3 of the population was imprisoned by serfdom or another form of slavery. Her good intentions were hindered by Pugachev's rebellion, the most violent uprising in the history of Russia. Serfs from everywhere joined the former Russian solider in a violent rebellion against the Russian government, demanding an end in serfdom, taxes, and military conscription. Catherine's intention was…

    • 1123 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stretched from Europe to the Pacific Ocean and included people with diverse cultures and traditions.2 Russia was a land of disparity and contradiction by the turn of the 20th century. It was caught in between two worlds: the traditional world of the peasantry and the modern world of the westernized elite.3 As these two world coexisted, their values, culture, and way of life extremely differed. Regardless of the persistence of a rural society and economy, Russia became exposed to profound urban and industrial growth during the second half of the 19th century. 4Many peasants surfed…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ancien Regime was riddled with social inequalities and therefor-growing discontent. Out of a population of around 25 million the First and Second Estates, which consisted of approximately 400,000 members, were largely exempt from taxes, such as the taille and the corvee, despite the fact they were the wealthiest estates. This left the burden of supporting the country to the (overall) poorest estate: the Third estate. Much of the Third Estate were alienated by the Nobility during the 18th C when, because of inflation, they increased feudal dues and sought new ways in which to extract money from the peasants at the same time as rising food prices and bad harvests crippled their incomes. The bourgeois were also prevented from obtaining high-ranking positions in the army, navy and the Church as the Nobility held these. As an added burden to the feudal dues many peasants paid they were also required to pay a tithe, one-tenth of their income, to the church as well as a vingtieme, taille, capitation and gabelle to the government. As the price of food surged their incomes did not, leaving many peasants struggling to get by. This combined with he fast growing population during the late 18th C created an ideal situation for change and revolution in the countryside.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays