Preview

Political Science Chapter 3

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
320 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Science Chapter 3
Part A
Both Marx and Plato’s utopias offer a vision of a society where citizens are not relegated to certain class roles just because of the level of wealth into which they are born. Their visions lead, however, in very different directions. Compare Marx and Plato’s notion of equality as laid out and practiced in their utopias.
MARX-
According to Marx humanity evidences two species characteristics: the capacity for harmonious society with others and the capacity for free, conscious and universal labor. Marx was one of the first to put socialism on a real-world, scientific basis. His starting point was reality.
Marx believe that humans come into the world with a clean slate, and what is subsequently written on that slate is determined by society rather than genetic inheritance. He believed we should eliminate private property and the division of labor, and you eliminate social inequality. If you eliminate that and you eliminate the cause of armed conflict then no class struggle is possible when classes no longer exist.
He believed that society would be able to decide what do to with its resources and capabilities. We should make our own history. (Pages 65-67)
Marx was most famous for his analysis of history in terms of class struggles. Marx believed that doing and becoming is achieved through creativity and inventing.
PLATO-
Plato said the best political order: a society devoid of all tension between philosphers and rulers. Plato’s is made up of a class of farmers and artisans, a class of warrior-auxiliaries, and a class of philosopher-guardians. Each class embodies one essential virtue. Workers and artisans poses moderation. Warrior-auxiliaries poses courage. Philosophers poses wisdom. Only philosophers poses a completely excellent soul. Each component of the republic does it’s job well. (Pages 59-62)

Part B
How do their differing notions of equality play out in any twentieth- or twenty-first century regimes or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    b) Both grow at the same rate, but for diff reasons: Rich dictatorships repress labor/grow through capital investment. Rich democracies pay labor more/grow through innovation.…

    • 4257 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    --Role of media in political life: Media mediates, informs the public about political news, sometimes biased.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is no such thing having a perfect life because there is always something offline. Marx believed that mankind was moving forward and never behind in their resource, however working class was getting paid unfairly for the work they have done. Industries are taking advantages of their employees and they do not get any benefits out of it. Even when the capitalism is improving, the wages did not improve the prosperity in the community. Marx believed that the society is achievable when everyone is working together.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that all humans were radical and that this directly influenced their organization of government. Similarly, to Locke, Marx classified society into two groups; The Bourgeois and The Proletarians. Marx believed that a ruling class was inevitable, “we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold of gradation of social ranks,” (Marx 9). All though, Marx sees no way to exist without social ranks, he also believes that in this case the bourgeois will join the proletarians in living a good life, “a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeoisie ideologists,” (Marx…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Science Midterm

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If Jefferson and Hamilton could return to the US today, who would be happier with the way the country has turned out and why? Also, what political party would they join and why?…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato States Decline Essay

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The rich fear the poor and so, become more dictatorial. Although there is growing poverty, the wealthy choose to ignore it and carry on accumulating more money. Plato points out here that the worst defect of this regime, and all regimes henceforth, is “that a man can sell all he has to another and live on as a member of society without any real function…” . Its believed to be the worst defect because a man can have no role within the state but still live in it as a pauper. Despite this, Plato credits this regime with having the virtue of…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was well known for his ideas about alienation. He believed everyone was born with a creative spirit, i.e. species being. Conflict is to fight or to battle, Karl Marx was the founder of conflict theory, according to sources conflict theory argues that the competition of groups and individuals for power and wealth is a fundamental process shaping the social structure. Conflict is manifested through Marx by who gets what and why, Marx argued that the labor market was shaped by class conflict. The capitalist class, which owned the means of production, promoted division of labor to maximize their profits and to disempowered…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Plato a totalitarian

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato was a totalitarian judging from The Republic. With the definition of totalitarianism in mind, Plato illustrates features of authoritarianism and ideology in his political worldview, which entails a strict division of classes, the dependency of the fate of the state on the ruling class as well as the superiority of the interests of the ruling class over the subservient and inferior classes. Furthermore, the uncompromising rules for breeding and educating this class combined with the strict supervision and collectivisation of the interests of its members create a close enough representation of the totalitarianism depicted in the definition. Firstly, in addressing the issue, which Plato begins with in The Republic of what justice is Plato, asserts that justice is that which is in the interest of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx believed in order for humans to survive we have to work, and that people either own the property or you work for someone who does.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The best and brightest of history’s philosophers have dedicated great amounts of time to describing the best forms of social and political organization with the hope of discovering the best way of life for humanity. Aristotle and Plato are certainly no exception. The teacher and the student, defined by each other’s works, have taken historical and groundbreaking positions that have greatly influenced politicians and future thinkers. No one writer of the Western World has been able to produce as much conversation and controversy as the writings of these two authors. Aristotle’s Politics and Plato’s Republic give vast amounts of insight into people and society’s behavior and ideals. Aristotle even makes references and criticisms of his teacher in his work forcing modern day academics to analyze both arguments and come up with different inferences. Subjects such as justice, governance, happiness, and inherent human nature are described and argued in both books and have direct impacts to the way individuals think and the way people live today. Both Plato and Aristotle have their own opinions as to what defines an ideal state and that the means of a state is to provide justice and to maximize utility for its citizens by instituting power and control through leaders that pursue wisdom, virtue, and knowledge. Although there are links between the two philosophers, each takes a unique approach to the question.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perfect

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the republic, Plato tried to imagine and make a most perfect just society. He argues that wisdom, which is based on truth, judgment, and reasons of a person, would make a just person and a just society, which would bring peace to the world. In his ideal society he believed that people would live harmoniously and there would no be violence. He divided the population of the society into three divisions or levels – the producers with bronze sash, the soldiers with silver sash, and the rulers with golden sash. And for each level he designated different types of education. The people were given their appropriate rank through the process of examination. He believes that, each person has his or her own area of expertise, which they can focus on. In his view a society is just in this manner, where people does only their designated roles and they do not interfere with the roles of the others. They keep their own boundaries in the society. His ideal government was an aristocracy. He believed that both men and women have the same souls and interest. The rulers with the golden sash are the philosophers, who have the wisdom to rule in order for a society to survive. They are the ones who have the knowledge to direct the society for benefit of all. The soldiers with the silver sash, upholds the authority, they are educated in both physical training and culture. And the producers with the bronze sash provide for themselves and for others. The people in that society, does not know who are their biological parents. He argues that they must treat one another as a family. They must look after each other as brothers and sisters. Having that argument for him means that there would be no violence among the people.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays