Preview

Comparing The Views Of Karl Marx And Andrew Ure

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Views Of Karl Marx And Andrew Ure
Karl Marx and Andrew Ure have two different perspectives the society and the main function to keep everything together as a whole. The society is looking for the idea that will progress instead staying within the same idea for many years. There are always pros and cons to every philosopher and the outcome could effective many people living in that society. The idea of Marx is about the social structure of urban society and the development of ideals taken from past revolutions. There is always room for development and that is what the society is all about. The capitalist societies were a very favorable goal by using different methods of production such as free trade and maintain their level of class. Ure has the advantages of the free trade …show more content…
Many factories out there will benefit the employees and not taking advantage of them. Marx, on the other hand, thinks differently because employees are working so hard, but the wages are not high enough and it is unfairly paid. Karl Marx, Andrew Ure, and Adam Smith have all different views of the society, however Marx is more convincing because his idea make more sense to many people in the society.
There are good and bad things happen in history and that is the life of the people in this world. There is no such thing having a perfect life because there is always something offline. Marx believed that mankind was moving forward and never behind in their resource, however working class was getting paid unfairly for the work they have done. Industries are taking advantages of their employees and they do not get any benefits out of it. Even when the capitalism is improving, the wages did not improve the prosperity in the community. Marx believed that the society is achievable when everyone is working together. The life is all about “the general process of social, political and intellectual life” (257). It is all about team building exercise. Working class needs to benefit from the labor especially if the wages are being offered low. In
…show more content…
He did some calculation about workers will idle for 45 seconds each minute of working. By the end of the day, there was not work because the technology is doing most of the work. Factory work is so much “hard work is performed by the steam engine, no hard labor at all” (228). I am against Ure ideology because doesn’t mean if technology is helping you do the labor, that does that mean you are benefiting from the employer. It is about being there at your job and doing what you are supposed to be doing. In today’s life, it is about doing your job and you will be getting pay hourly and it is not about how much work you put on the job. Ure point is not helping the society improve and it will just make more people suffer. I think certain people are meant for certain jobs in the society and not everyone can do that job. People are different in the society and Ure is complaining about how factory jobs are a lot easier than skilled workers who have to use their muscle all day long. The skilled jobs are getting paid a lot than people in the factory job and that would be their benefits. It doesn’t matter if factory job barely does anything because of technology such as the steam engine; it is about the type of job that will pay you well enough to stay alive. He thought the factory worker would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Capitalist system, which created the Industrial Revolution, was thought to eventually drive factories out of business. This would leave factory working with no work and alone on the streets. Communism would create jobs and wealth for the factory workers and create wealth. Also, with the equal distribution of goods and services, there would be improved working conditions. This was very important to them. A good example is when the Luddites destroyed the factories because they were mad about working conditions.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were both radical socialists who lived during the industrial revolution. They strongly opposed capitalism, the main economic system. They wrote in their book, the communist manifesto, that capitalism has always led to two groups of people opposing each other. They used examples from different times throughout history to support their theories. Some of these examples included patricians vs plebeians, and lords vs serfs.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Vs Marx

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marx's entire approach is for the benefit of the people. While Mill states that the main goal is to be happy Marx's approach would ensure that most people are happy. Marx approach allows people to have many jobs and not just one, it also allows people to feel just like everyone else. This is significant as there are many differences between people today, such as inequality, racism, different social classes, and etc. Mills approach doesn't guarantee people that they will be happier, it simply says that people should work to make themselves and others happy. Marx allows people to receive free education and be able to work to become anything they want. The end of classes would create no greed or want leading everyone to satisfied because everyone has the same as them. There will also be no opposition towards classes and no hatred towards the “peasants” or the “surfs” because those will be no more. This is significant as these differences caused wars such as the civil war, and other world wars. Removing social classes will help decrease the level of tension between people and overall provide moral benefit to people. The abolition of private property also helps the majority of the people because now people won't look at other people's house in awe and say “wow i wish i lived in a house like…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communist Paper

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In The Communist Manifesto, I believe the authors’ Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels is trying to reach the goal of a perfect society by illustrating ideas of a perfectly successful society, a communist society. Simply put, a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other, but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors.…

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx has long been established as one of the most influential thinkers and writers of modern times. The Communist Manifesto which was published back in 1848 covers his theories regarding socialism. It aided the establishment of communist Russia and although that particular scenario failed there are elements of Marx’s work that I find relevant in today’s society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like many other community comments from the nineteenth century, Marx thought that the pay no workers were paid, did not represent the value of the goods they created through their work. Through parts of their working hours, a…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Industrial Revolution, communism was another significant and influential theories based on the social changes that guided the development of this theory. Karl Marx was a German philosopher and one of the founding fathers of the establishment of communism. Within his time, he developed a book called “The Communist Manifesto” in 1878 which allowed people to have a better understanding of the formation of the communism form and how it was ultimately structured. Marx helped to motivate and help the lower classes by introducing the ideas of rioting and protesting in aggressive matters in order to take control of the upper class to allow the lower classes to be out of poverty. Overall Marx saw the Industrial Revolution as the start of the economic disputes that was necessary to order to develop a new theory based on Socialism which eventually evolved into Communism.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx’s primary claim is that an individual’s moral, philosophical and religious ideas are reflections based on our material circumstance and that they are not autonomous driving forces in history as others have claimed. Marx concluded that ‘instead of shaping society, ideas were in fact shaped by society’ (Mann & Dann, 2005). By this he meant that the economic system of a society determines what values and principles are upheld. Therefore, an outdate society would value attributes such as honour and loyalty to keep people in line, whereas a capitalist society would value freedom and equality to keep the workforce as large and as mobile as possible to keep down wages. When a society’s economic conditions experience a fundamental change and a new class assumes supremacy after a political revolution has occurred and installed that leading class in power. Marx predicted that a communist revolution eliminating private property and the subjugation of one class by another would occur at the end of history society (Mann & Dann, 2005).…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sake Etiek

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Karl Marx’s theory is based on the surplus value (Karl Marx 's theories? .2008). According to Karl Marx capitalists are able to exploit workers(doing involuntarily labour as a mere means to an end and not as an end in itself) because they only have labour to offer and this could be their only source of income, thus resulting in workers getting paid less than value created by their labour. Through these exploitations capitalists are able to increase their profits. This will cause workers to become rebellious and in result refusal of being further exploited (Shaw.2011.149) Workers will then create a system that will fully benefit them all (ibid). These capitalists system contradicts Marx’s forecast. Even though it has tempered greedy, exploitive dispositions of early capitalism, these systems cannot prevent the alienation of workers caused by their unfulfilling work (ibid). The unequal positions of capitalist’s where workers must work for someone else thus satisfying others needs and leads to them feeling exploited(ibid).…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The conflict between freeman and slaves, lord and serf, and oppressor and oppressed created class conflict due to their different economic roles and status in society.[2] Bourgeoisie, as the oppressor, their paid wages did not keep pace with the workers’ outputs. Misery had been created. Once the oppressed organized their power to get rid of the misery and inequality, the capitalists would face a revolution. In addition, the exploitation of labor force actually contradicted the foundations of capitalism. Capitalism provoked non-agricultural activities to obtain profits and private ownership, but not the inequalities. On the other hand, communism provided an organizational force for working class to overthrow the bourgeoisie through a revolution.[3] Since capitalism did not satisfy the diverse demand from people, communism would fail to fulfill people’s diverse demand too. Communism distributed wealth equally, but not fairly. This distribution of wealth abolished the private property.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The purpose of Karl Marx’s piece is to prove the point that communism can fix the class gap that free market and bourgeoisie society has created. He proves his point that giving many examples of how communism would be the answer to stop the exploitation of workers and share the wealth, giving the people equality across the board…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Durkheim

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were full of evolving social and economic ideas. These views of the social structure of urban society came about through the development of ideas taken from the past revolutions. As the Industrial Revolution progressed through out the world, so did the gap between the class structures. The development of a capitalist society was a very favorable goal for the upper class. By using advanced methods of production introduced by the Industrial Revolution, they were able to earn a substantial surplus by ruling the middle class. Thus, maintaining their present class of life, while the middle class was exploited and degraded. At this time in history, social theorists like Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx challenged the aspect of social structure in their works. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist states that everything serves a function in society and his main concern to discover what that function was. On the other hand Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, stresses that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Both Durkheim and Marx were concerned with the characteristics of groups and structures rather than with individuals.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that the Proletariat classes within society would realise that they are being exploited by the ruling class and rise up in revolution removing the class conflict and imposing a communist society where each person was equal. However, many sociologists argue that this idea created by Marx cannot be applied to today’s society due to the fact that a revolution has not occurred. Although there have been several revolutions in the past within some societies, such as in Russia, they have not occurred in all societies nor have they remained permanent. Also, Marx’s idea of communism being better than capitalism has been questioned by many sociologists, especially within today’s society;…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx believed that history evolved in a way that can be understood and acted on by people. He also believed that economics drives history and is the base structure of society. He viewed history as proof that evolution is inevitable and that a revolution’s determinate factor will be economics. Concepts such as the bourgeoisie, surplus value, and industrial reserve army serve as evidence that support Marx’s belief in the revolutionary potential of the working class.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays