Preview

Political Factors Affecting The Confirmation Process Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Factors Affecting The Confirmation Process Essay
The judicial branch is often assumed to be insulated from politics. However, politics affect many aspects of the judiciary
It is easy to view the judiciary as separate from politics; judges are appointed for life, they do not depend of the popular vote for election thus they do not have to campaign. However, just because politics are not inherently present does not mean they do not have a role in the world that is the judiciary.
Describe two political factors that affect president’s decisions to appoint members of the federal judiciary
A president’s decision for judicial nominees is affected by many factors. A few examples of these factors are gender, race and professional credibility. Society is bursting with stereotypes and stigmas. Because …show more content…
To start, the advice and consent of the Senate affects the process as the Senate and Judiciary Committee as they may not approve of the President’s nominee, and just as it is vital for a future significant other to attain the approval of the best friend it is fundamental the Senate and Judiciary Committee confirm the President’s nominee. Continuing with this theme, the majority party of the Senate- if it differs from the President- may choose to block appointments by filibustering, which is basically a bona fide weed killer, it can kill just about every undesirable outcome there is. Finally, the process all comes to an end with the big guy, metaphorically of course. If the President appointment is to a court lower than the Supreme Court, then the senior senator from the state where the judge is being appointed may disapprove of the nominee. Senatorial courtesy can be compared to receiving a blessing for being wed; not impossible without, but definitely infinitely more complicated without.
Explain how one legislative power serves as a check on court decisions
Legislative checks on court decisions come in many forms. The legislative branch has the power to impeach judges for misconduct, as well as the power to delay or limit spending on policies implemented as a result of court decisions. Essentially the legislative branch
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism
    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment

    Judicial Independence Within a Political Process. Our judicial branch of government was designed not only to serve as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches but also to be the final arbiter on disputes among states and between the states and the federal government. One important arbitration tool utilized by the judicial branch is judicial review. Judicial review is one of the U.S. Constitution’s most provocative features as it plays an important role in shaping the laws that impact our society. For this discussion, complete the following:…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Executive Branch Checks And Balances
    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Executive Branch Checks And Balances

    Checks and balances is the way that each branch of government verifies another branch’s decisions. It limits the government’s power and makes sure one branch does not have and cannot gain too much power. The Legislative Branch checks the Judicial Branch by proposing constitutional laws to override judicial decisions and they can impeach supreme court justices. Impeaching is to “vote or bring charges of serious crimes against the president” (Deverell). The Executive Branch checks the Legislative Branch by vetoing bills and may adjourn congress in some situations. To veto is to deny or cancel a law or amendment. The Judicial Branch checks the Executive Branch by declaring executive actions unconstitutional. An unconstitutional law is one that…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Texas Judicial System Case Study
    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Texas Judicial System Case Study

    Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection
    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    As a member of this committee it has been an honor to explore some of the concerns revolving around the judicial selection process in this Great State of Oregon. Oregon’s above average voter participations is an example of just how important democracy is to the individuals of the state. The committee has been asked to examine the nonpartisan judicial election process and to determine whether or not the non-partisan judicial selection has become increasingly partisan and more polarized. Both of which have serious consequences if unchecked periodically. As was said By James Madison in his writing of The Federalist No. 51, “It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Confederate Congress
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Confederate Congress

    For example, the Executive Branch can veto bills from the Legislative Branch, who can then in turn vote to override the veto with a majority approval. The Judicial Branch may review laws proposed by either of the other branches and declare them unconstitutional if applicable. Judicial power is balanced by the act of appointment into position by the other two branches of government. Should a representative of the judicial branch overexert their influence their appointment may be removed. (congressforkids.net,…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Constitution
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

    An example is with the fact that the Supreme Court can rule laws unconstitutional by using the power of judicial review. Additionally, the supreme court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. On the other side, Judges can be impeached by congress and removed from the bench and have its decisions overturned as well. Furthermore, the executive branch not the judicial branch has the power to appoint judges to the supreme court. With this in mind, in times of conflict the President has the power to pardon individuals convicted of crimes. As can be seen, the Judicial branch consists of numerous checks and balances that limit its power and the power of other branches.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Senate Pros And Cons
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Senate Pros And Cons

    In Jonathan Adler’s article “The erroneous argument the senate has a ‘constitutional duty’ to consider a supreme court nominee” he gives insight into both sides of the argument whether or not the senate should go ahead and vote for supreme court nominee Merrick Garland. He states hoe the American constitution never states that the senate has to consider every presidential nominee. Adler does state how the Alliance of Justice says that it is the senate’s constitutional obligation to vote and hold a hearing for the nominee. He says that the senate is allowed to refuse to act on a nomination. But even though the senate is allowed to withhold there are still consequences and political risks if they continue to refuse the nominee.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Three Branches Of Government
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Are The Three Branches Of Government

    Another example of checks and balances is the president’s appointments. The president is able to nominate people for various positions, including the Judges of the Supreme Court, but the Senate must also approve of who the president nominates, which means that the president cannot nominate anyone he pleases. The judiciary also has the power to interpret the laws, and can deem a law passed by Congress to be unconstitutional. This limits the power of Congress to pass any law they want, as well as the checks and balances of the legislative process discussed in paragraph two. These examples are just a few of the many ways that the branches can limit the power of the other branches to ensure that none become too…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism In Canada
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Activism In Canada

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Three Branches Of Government
    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Three Branches Of Government

    The legislative branch, or Congress is responsible for creating the laws of the nation, making it the most powerful branch of government. The executive branch holds the sole duty of enforcing the laws passed by Congress to ensure order in the nation, giving the branch its power. The Supreme court, or the judicial branch, interprets these laws made by Congress, they can declare laws unconstitutional thus checking the power of Congress. The Constitution gives equality to its citizens and the three branches of government, it limits powers and abilities as well as ensures the needs of the people, the three branches ensure the order of the nation and creates harmonization in the government and its…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Branch
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Judicial Branch

    For example, both executive and legislative branches have more of an influence on people and their everyday lives, whereas the judiciary branch deals with problems that are brought before them in real circumstances not situations that could occur. Executive branch, for example, is able to appoint judges to the Supreme Court and legislation can impeach a judge out of office. This type of power is not given to the judiciary branch only review the decisions that are made, even if the Judiciary branch doesn't necessarily like the decisions the Supreme Court has made over all it can ultimately not be affected by the judiciary. The stability of this power of a Supreme Court judge is to retain the…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Persuasive Essay
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Persuasive Essay

    As many know, Senior Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.) has launched a blockade on Obama's Supreme Court nominee (Merrick Garland) in order to prevent Democratic control of the organization. While many view McConnell's strategy as an ignorant schism, his plan has many policy implications following last night's election results (Liptak). With Republican control over both the Presidency and Congress, the party will be eligible to appoint multiple Supreme Court justices. Thus, changing the entire political spectrum of the country. A Republican dominated Supreme Court means more conservative decisions on controversial issues including gay marriage, abortion, and the second amendment.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics