Preview

Plato: Immortality of the Soul

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato: Immortality of the Soul
PHAEDO: IMMORTALITY OF SOUL
In the dialogue Phaedo Plato discusses the immortality of the soul. He presents four different arguments to prove the fact that although the body of the human perishes after death; the soul still exists and remains eternal. Firstly, he explains the Argument from Opposites that is about the forms and their existence in opposite forms. His second argument is Theory of Recollection which assumes that each and every information that one has in his/her mind is related to information and plays an important role in remembering. While trying to convince his readers, Plato proposes another argument claiming that the soul and the body are different forms. While the body is visible and mortal, the soul is invisible and immortal. He suggests that although the body dies and decays, the soul continues to exist. This is called Affinity Argument. Lastly, Plato uses his most convincing argument to prove the immortality of the soul. In this argument Plato uses his Theory of Forms. He explains that every quality participate in its form.
In his first argument Argument from Opposites, Plato explores the idea of life and death and their relation to each other. He declares that there is a cycle which allows everything to come out of its opposite. He suggests that: “Between each of those pairs of opposites there are two processes: from the one to the other and then again from the other to the first” (71b). He tries to emphasize that “living comes from the dead and the dead from living” (72b). Therefore, after one dies, the soul does not cease to exist. The soul continues to live and comes to life again. After clearing his thoughts on opposites, he begins his theory of recollection. He uses this theory in order to convince his readers in believing that the soul is immortal and has already existed before coming to the world. He suggests that human beings recollect what they have forgotten during birth. He says that “Our souls existed apart from the body

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to prove that Socrates is successful in replying to the objections of Simmias and Cebes in Plato’s Phaedo, and in proving the soul to be immortal.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato considered the soul ‘to be the immortal essence of the person’ and to house three individual parts- Reason, Emotion, and Desire (Jowett, 2007). While the soul…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments For Phaedo

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Phaedo, Socrates does not fear death because he believes that his soul is immortal and will be sent to heaven after his death. It is worth noticing here that he pre-assumes that the soul exists, so his central argument is not about whether the soul exists, but whether it is immortal. One of his arguments is that the soul is invincible, and invincible things can’t be destroyed, so the soul is immortal. I shall explain more fully this argument in the next paragraph. Then I shall offer my objection on his premise that invincible things can’t be destroyed, and thus how his argument of the immortality of the soul is invaid.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato uses the Forms to try to show that the soul is eternal. He says that the soul and the body are different things, and the body is just a container for the soul. He even goes further by saying that the soul is trying to get back to its pure state. By these statements Plato is saying that the body is physical, which means that it is only temporary, it changes, and imperfect. On the other hand, the soul is non-physical and therefore is eternal, unchanging, perfect and universal. However, this is insufficient information to base his argument that all souls are the same on. All souls are different because every person is different. If the soul and makes a person and every person is different that means that every soul has its own personality or characteristics. This is shown everyday because know two people are exactly alike, not even twins. Aristotle talks about a similar reason for not following the Forms. Aristotle states that if the Forms are supposed to be perfect and unchanging, how is it possible for one thing to be better than the other. For example, it is like saying that beauty is an eternal Form that doesn’t change. However, in fact it does change because has the ability to be more beautiful than…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phaedo

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During anyone’s last hours on Earth, they would probably want to spend time with loved ones and reflect on everything that has happened in their life. However, Socrates had different intentions; he instead wanted to spend the little time he had left to philosophize one last time with his friends. The topic of discussion was the soul and Socrates’ goal was to prove to everyone that while our bodies may not be immortal, the soul is. One of his main explanations is through the use of the argument of contraries. Using this argument, Socrates successfully convinces his peers that the soul must exist outside of the body. Even though he may have received acceptance from those closest to him at the time of his death, Socrates fails to differentiate between the soul and the physical body and to explain the creation of the soul. This then leads one to question the validity and effectiveness of the argument of contraries.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time there have been many different views of what afterlife is. Plato and Christianity are no different; between the two ideas there are many similarities and differences that can be distinguished. Plato believed in the idea of immortality and dualism. He believed that the soul was immortal both before and after death, and that the body was mortal and ceased to function after death. Plato believed that your soul has always existed and always will, and that your embodied life as a human is just a small part of your existence. Plato believed that the disembodied soul was the highest form of survival because the immaterial realm of the forms is the highest form of existence. In other words Plato suggests that your embodied existence is not nearly as ideal as your disembodied existence. The basis of Christianity is bodily resurrection. Like Plato’s theory Christianity also believes in the cessation of bodily functions after death, and also believes that the soul does exist for a time disembodied. However in Christianity the soul begins at birth and is not immortal, it dies with the body, and then is resurrected after an unknown period of time by God. Christianity suggests the theory that people follow the Christian Doctrine of Predestination. This is essentially the theory that humans cannot chose whether they will be saved to heaven and from hell. It is the idea that some humans are chosen by God as elect, and some humans are damned by God. In other words; a person can do nothing about their predestination. The idea of predestination is not contingent upon status, or moral character, it is only by the grace of God that a person may be saved. This idea has been controversial, but many well known Christians were known to believe in predestination. Many Christians also believe in the idea that humans have partial control over their afterlife. They believe that they can achieve salvation by through moral character, and belief. This is also a widely accepted…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crito, By Socrates

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The second argument was the Theory of Recollection, which proposes that the soul has existed before one is born, since learning is a recollection of what has been learned from past lives. Thirdly, the Argument of Affinity claims there are a clear distinction between the unseen and seen, the immortal and the mortal, hence soul and the body. Lastly, the Argument from Form of Life expresses that Forms are the cause of all the things that exist in the world. These four arguments explained the soul to be immortal. Since Socrates takes a stance of soul immortality, he also believes that the soul goes into afterlife once separated from the body.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lastly, I am going to look at Plato’s view of dualism Plato believes in the connection between the body and the mind which is referred to as dualism. “Plato believed that the true substances are not physical bodies, which are ephemeral, but the eternal Forms of which bodies are imperfect copies.” (Dualism Stanford). This means that it is what is inside of us that makes us who we are which is the mind. It is hard to explain Plato’s dualistic views because it is described on a metaphysical level. Plato does not specify how the soul binds with the body but believes there is a strong continuity between the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Tripartite Soul

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As a philosophical treatise, it is to be commended for appreciating the complexity of human motivations, however given our contemporary biological knowledge we can see that the simplified composition of the ‘soul’ espoused by Plato may be untenable. Also, by virtue of the soul being a conglomerate of three distinct forces, this raises philosophical issues regarding the soul’s immortality (that has been and is still affirmed by the author).…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    [2] Garth, Kemerling. ‘Plato: Immortality and the Forms’ Philosophy Pages. 12 November 2011. Retrieved November 27 2014, from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2f.htm…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays