Preview

Pinker Review

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pinker Review
The blank slate, written by Steven Pinker; an experimental psychologist and cognitive scientist, examines the ideas behind the ongoing debate regarding human nature and the theories of nature and nurture. The book begins with and in depth outline of the three doctrines of the nurture debate, the first being “The blank slate” which asserts that individuals are “born void of all characters without any ideas” as stated by John Locke (1632-1704) and that behavior is learnt from society and those around us e.g. parents, peers, etc. The second doctrine, which is “ The noble savage” claims that individuals are born innocent and pure and it is society that teaches and encourages corruption. Finally “The ghost in the machine” which states that the mind and the body work separately (dualism).

In chapter two pinker examines how these doctrines have been supported by popular ideologies such as Marxism and feminism etc. and what therefore makes them appeal to a wider range of people, Karl Marx and the Marxist ideology asserts that people are socialized to accept their positions in society and to accept the unfair hierarchy e.g. the power of church, government, ideas towards lifestyles etc. as a result of being under false consciousness, Marxist Author Sean Sayers supports this claiming that human beings “are not only biological organism; they are also, who change and transform themselves and essentially, social and historical beings who change and transform themselves through their social activity” this idea goes hand in hand with the doctrines of the “blank slate” and “noble savage” whereby the socialization process plays an immense role in individuals behavior . However Pinker makes a very convincing argument against the idea of socialization being solely if not majorly dominant on a persons behavior by using the example of Chimpanzees who have been raised with humans or in a human home, and states that even though they have been socialized around human beings their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. nurture develops a strong debate in psychology. It is made up of two independent dynamics with different approaches in behavioural changes. The two dynamics is made up of nature and nurture. There are no contentions that McLeod's tries to unravel technical differences between the two dynamics. In the novel frankenstein Nature expresses the external characteristics of human beings that are projected by genetic inheritance. It is difficult to alter changes in some external, internal characteristics that are developed by inheritance of particular genes. Nurture refers to external expressions developed by interaction of different environments and people. It is evident that nurture characteristic can be altered by the people. This is…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Human nature is a vexing issue: some argue that we are born as blank slates and our 
natures are defined by upbringing, experience, culture and the ideas of our time. Others 
believe that human nature is innate and pre-destined, regardless of time and…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I have always held the belief that Nature v Nurture is not a zero-sum game. To steal a line from T.S. Elliot’s The Hollow Men, I believe humans are born into this world a “shape without form.” That shape, of course, is our nature; the sum of our genetic make-up and natural tendencies based on some combination of predisposition and innate sense of self. The form, then, necessarily reflects our experiences and the way those have restructured our ‘self.’ The nurture of our mind, particularly at a young age, is instrumental in providing depth and context to our natural shape. Both aspects of our ‘self’ are complimentary. Just like we are unable to understand shape without the context of form, we are similarly unable to understand humans without an understanding in the dynamic of both nature and nurture expressed through our behavior, desires, and interactions.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of Nature v. Nurture has been a psychological debate that initially began in 1871 by Sir Francis Galton. The debate consisted of the idea whether or not people have specific behavioral traits due to one’s lineage or rather the experiences one has in his/her lifetime. As the conflict carried on, a third view had birthed itself. This view mediated the two oppositions, saying this conflict should not be one at all. Rather than one side opposing the other, both sides together could be the answer to this prolonged debate. It is perceived that people are similar to their ancestry to a certain extent, then as they begin to live their lives more freely; their behaviors are later modified with their personal experiences.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, many still question whether the influences of nature and nurture respectively could overrule one another in any circumstances. 17th century philosopher John Locke theorised that human nature is a blank state, ready to be influenced by a given environment. If Locke’s assumption holds true, this would…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Blank Blank Slate

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pinker published a book titled The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature in 2002 disputing about the debate believing that human nature is molded by ‘evolutionary psychology adaptations’. Pinker's views tend to be science- oriented, the predominance of the book entails him arguing that modern science has challenged the so-called ‘three dogmas’ of the creation of human nature. The beliefs that he professes are being questioned include; the blank slate view, as discussed before, a view created by purist John Locke in the 18th century, one of which is outdated compared to the advancements within society and science. Another ideology being challenged is named ‘noble savage’ and it constitutes of the ideology that society corrupts people who are born perfectly good and innocent. This particular dogma can be supported up by previously mentioned contributor Ashley Montague as he stated aggression is caused by people growing up in a ‘highly competitive, threatening world’ similar to the ‘noble savage’ idea that it is indeed society that changes an individual. The final teaching he believes is currently being dispelled by modern science ‘the ghost in the machine’ in which biology has no impact on the choices we make, and instead it is undoubtedly the soul that controls our choices made in life. Criticisms of Pinker's book however described the scientific language he was using as ‘soft science’ and many behaviourists believed that he didn’t express the true definition of behaviorism within his…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has also not made a contribution to our understanding in terms of its believed we are majorly influenced by those around us and are vulnerable to conforming into the social view. It’s thought that each individual is liable for creating their own thoughts, beliefs and feelings. Although an individual may perceive to follow the majority it may not be that the individual ideally would like to, however due to society they may feel pressured into following their social group, leading to them avoiding and ignoring personal values and beliefs of…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are serial killers naturally, instinctive psychopaths or are they the result of a corrupt upbringing? Are you more at risk of becoming a smoker because of your genes or is it a result of the peers you socialize with? Now, these types of questions have instigated disputes among psychologists in determining who we are, whether it is a result of nature, such as heredity, or is it the outcome of the nurturing of one’s environment that shape our personality? In other words, were you born with a blank mind and over time you developed your characteristics or were you born with talents and characteristics since birth? Regarded as the oldest issue known in the field of psychology, nature versus nurture is and this debate centers on the question: How…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Blank Slate Analysis

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The concept of the blank slates derives from the idea that people turn out to be who they are not from genes but from the contribution of parenting, socialization, and experiences (Pinker, 2003). In other words, people believe environmental factors play a major role in their lifespan development. Moreover, those who believe that the human brain is not genetically predisposed also indicates that human beings do not have instincts (Pinker, 2003). Contrary to popular belief, there are others who are contentious upon this concept. Among those who disagree with the blank slates, Steven Pinker is one of them (Pinker, 2003). Pinker is a psychologist who wrote the book The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. He argues that people…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John. B. Watson believed that our behaviour is shaped by our responses to the environment in which we grow up. The comparison between Nature vs. Nurture is examined through the development of an individual and innate qualities and personal experiences of biological, environmental and social factors. The idea of different experiences within an infant leads to personal development, and the chapter cites an example of isolated children to prove that from experiencing such an event, one will result in permanent developmental damage.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vladimir Lenin, a Russian political theorist, said, “For our attitude towards this phenomenon to be a politically conscious one, it must be realized that no natural science and no materialism can hold its own in the struggle against the onslaught of [. . .] ideas and restoration [. . .]” (Lenin). Lenin is talking about how it takes more than materialism to keep the lower class oppressed. The first thing the upper class in the World State does is creates classes in order to make people lose their sense of individuality. The Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning describes the reason they do this to Mr. Foster on the subject of Bernard. The director states that the life of a “mere individual” is insignificant over the life of the society (Huxley 148). This paraphrase clearly states it is society that is really important, not the individual; therefore individualism must be taken away. Secondly, they get their workers ensnared in their work with no extra time. Mond is speaking to some Alphas when he stated, “Now-such is progress- the old men work, the old men copulate, the old men have no time, no leisure from pleasure, not a moment to sit down and think [. . .]” (Huxley 55). Giving the lower class no time to sit down and think makes their realization of oppression incomprehensible. Lastly, the World State literally takes away individualism! John is grieving over his mother…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature Nurture Debate

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The nature nurture debate has been one of the most contraversial debates since it was introduced in the 1870's by one of the first experimental psychologists Francis Galton. Since that time an increasing number of psychologists have become significantly interested in the nature nurture debate- like Galton they to have been trying to determine whether or not the way in which humans conduct themselves are inherited through their genes or if human kinds mannerisms are influenced by the enviroment in which they develop in.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture Debate

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The nature versus nurture debate is one of the most enduring in the field of psychology. In the 17th century the French philosopher René Descartes set out views which held that we all, as individual Human Beings, possess certain in-born ideas that enduringly underpin our approach to the world. The British philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, on the other hand, took a more empirical approach emphasizing the role of experience as fully contributing to behavioral development.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Nature-nurture Debate

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The nurture only sides states that we are all essentially the same at birth ,and we are the product of our experiences. As we have consider, john Locke (1690;1959) popularize the idea that the newborn human mind is a blank slate on which the experience of life was written. This accumulation of experiences makes us who we are. This view means that anything is possible. You can be anything you want to be. this notion is very Western, very north American idea. It stands as the cornerstone of democracy, free will, and equality.(pinker, 2002).…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Childhood Trauma

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    & Li, 2001). With the brain developing at its fastest rate in childhood, it is especially…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays