Preview

Pinion Paper on the Brothers Karamazov, the Grand Inquisitor by Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pinion Paper on the Brothers Karamazov, the Grand Inquisitor by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Opinion Paper on The Brothers Karamazov, The Grand Inquisitor by Fyodor Dostoyevsky

In Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov, the Grand Inquisitor is told by Ivan to Alyosha. The setting of the story is in the 16th century in Spain. According to the story, Christ came back once again, briefly, and appeared quietly in the midst of the people, healing those who came to him. People begin to recognize him though, and the guards came and took him away and put him into prison. The “Grand Inquisitor” visits Christ in jail and begins to question why Christ has made a reappearance. He begins to state that Christ has already had his say, and that he set the world in motion and that he already had his turn on earth. He also says that everything is running according to his plans, and he doesn’t belong here anymore. The grand inquisitor says that he has made things better and fixed the mess he left them. He tells Christ that he has given people free will and it was not a wise thing to do. He says that people will always make bad choices and that people are not capable of using free will. I personally disagree with the Grand Inquisitor when he states this. Christ was definitely not wrong in giving people free will, and people do not just use it for bad reasons. I believe that throughout the talk between the Christ and The Grand Inquisitor, it seems as if the Inquisitor argues, the only option is for people to lead sinful lives ending in damnation, and this occurs because of free will. This is definitely not true. Free will, although at times might be used in the wrong ways is definitely not just a bad thing. It is certainly a good thing as well. People being able to choose what they like to do, and having free will does not mean people will always use this to make decisions for the worse and to do harm. People most certainly use free will in good ways as well and Christ was not wrong for giving people this asset. In essence, without free will evil would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (or Ivan the Terrible) was the ruler of Russia from 1533-1584. Ivan IV is credited for creating an absolute monarchy in Russia. He gained Mongol land for Russia and expanded the Russian economy on a small scale. Although Ivan IV accomplished these goals for Russia, he does deserve his nickname, Ivan the Terrible. Ivan IV was a very intelligent man, but many people believed that he was mentally ill. This would explain his violent outbursts and his infamous behavior. His troubled childhood might be a possible explanation for his outburst issues.Both of his parents died before he was 8 years old. After his parents death he was faced with constant danger and neglect, which led to him hating the boyar class and torturing small animals as…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood Book Report

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote tells the story of when the poor Clutter family was slaughtered in Holcomb, Kansas in 1959. In Cold Blood took six years for Capote to investigate and write, and it put an incredible amount of pressure on Truman, so much so that he never published another book again. Even though in cold Blood doesn’t have a great ending, the book was worth reading because of the intriguing plot, dark tone, and the interesting characters.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Only two (2) percent of the Russian men who were born in the 1920s survived the end of the war. In other words, an entire generation of men had disappeared by 1945. As a result, there were villages and small communities where the only inhabitants were women.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ivan the Terrible Thesis

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ivan IV Vesilyevich, also known as Ivan the Terrible, was born into Russian royalty on the 25th of August 1530. His parents were Vasili III (See1-1) and Elena Glinskaya( See 1-2). When Ivan was only three years old, his father, Vasili III, died of a blood infection. Young Ivan was announced the Grand Prince of Moscow on the 3rd of December in 1533. This was the beginning of his reign. His rough childhood is thought to have been what drove him to be known as Ivan the Terrible.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion is the official definition of free will. With free will, God gave us the choice to do whatever we want. With the devil tempting us, we are more inclined to choose evil over bad, but with God’s influence we choose good. Plus if humans were naturally evil everything we know about God is a lie. There are people who believe that the bible states that humans are born evil, however, it does not mentions the word evil. The bible states that humans are all born with original sin, the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, held to be inherited from Adam in consequence of the Fall. Because of free will and moral standards we choose what we know is right, deep in our hearts, human beings fear God ,therefore, it is in our nature to please…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ (39). The source of his errors is rooted into the last sentences of this essential paragraph. He argues, “ since the will extends further than the intellect, I do not contain the will within the same boundaries: rather, I also extend to things I do not understand. Because the will is indifferent in regards to such matters, it easily turns away from the true good; and in this way I am deceived and I sin” (39) He doesn’t only apply his ability to exercise free will on matters he understands, but also on matters that he does not understand. His ability to think leads him to think. argue and question many ideas. In some of these cases an opportunity may arise when has to choose a side of the matter. The free will he posses do not tell him the correct side to choose. He rationalizes it into his on his own understanding and then he chooses a side. This can lead him to make an error and be imperfect because the side he might have chosen could be the wrong choice. God gave him the ability to think and choose but God does not tell him the correct choice and this can lead him to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea that God gave humans free will is one that is essential to the Christian faith. This is highlighted in Genesis. If we were to believe this concept consequently, we would believe that we are morally responsible for our actions. The idea of omnipotence logically requires God knowing what we will do before we do it. This is a problem with the idea of free will, as this may mean that we do not entirely have freedom. It could be argued that God has no right to reward and punish if he is able to foresee what will happen. In the Bible there are many passages which demonstrate God rewarding and punishing.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Erasmus holds that man is left with the choice of doing either good or evil. It is man's choice and therefore, free will exists. In the opinion of Erasmus, the freedom of the will in Holy Scriptures is as follows: if on the road to piety, one should continue eagerly to improve; if one has become involved in sin, one should make every effort to extricate oneself, and to solicit the mercy of the Lord. Two conclusions concerning Erasmus' beliefs can be drawn from this statement; firstly that man can himself find repentance and secondly that God is infallible, meaning that a person engages in evil acts with his own will. The definition of free will given by Erasmus is "the power of the human will whereby man can apply to or turn away from that which leads unto eternal salvation."…

    • 1028 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Education is a force to be reckoned with in terms of making or breaking a country, especially a powerful country, like Russia. After Vladimir Lenin, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the Soviet Union, died in1924, there were many challenges to succession by the party members, namely Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev, and Josef Stalin. Josef Stalin was not seen as a threat, as a result, the other 3 politicians did not see what Stalin was capable of, which ended up in Stalin eliminating them and taking the seat of power for him. Josef Stalin had many plans for Russia. He had many stances and views on many things he saw that,…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent was the success of Stalin in retaining power in the USSR through fear?…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is the concept that humanity has the ability to make their own choices, this suggests that humanity has a moral understanding that is inherent and God given. Some people argue that you are born with this morality and it does not develop. Christians would argue that this morality is god given, and that we merely develop it through our upbringing. If Christians accept the concept of God, then it is necessary that they view God as omniscient, this would suggest he knows everything we have done and everything we will do, thus taking away free will. However, many Christians take the view that god gave us free will after he cast Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. In this way moral responsibility can exist and there can be a differentiation between a person who acts morally and immorally because there is now the option of choice.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    or centuries, philosophers and theologians have almost unanimously held that civilization as we know it depends on a widespread belief in free will—and that losing this belief could be calamitous. Our codes of ethics, for example, assume that we can freely choose between right and wrong. In the Christian tradition, this is known as “moral liberty”—the capacity to discern and pursue the good, instead of merely being compelled by appetites and desires. The great Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant reaffirmed this link between freedom and goodness. If we are not free to choose, he argued, then it would make no sense to say we ought to choose the path of righteousness.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a phenomenological debate on how free “free will” truly is from time immemorial; as long as humanity has been self-aware they have wondered if their decisions are their own. This curiosity has reared its head in theology, philosophy, literature, and more recently the fields of psychology, cognitive science, and sociology. The Catholic Christian tradition has long supported the idea that one is in control of one’s own thoughts and actions and therefore is responsible for said thoughts and actions. Calvinism, however, has largely disagreed with this sentiment in stating that there is no free will, that all our thoughts and actions are fated, and that one’s place in Heaven or one’s place in Hell is predetermined. Predestination, as this is called, was prominent in Scotland at the time William Shakespeare’s Macbeth was being written. At this time a Scottish, Protestant King has united his crown with that of England and a year before its creation there was a Catholic plot to assassinate this King, all of his advisors, and the other Protestant politicians of the time. These are events…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If free will did not exist then how does it explain the good in evil in the world. For instance if God knew peoples destiny’s he would have it to where we would all choose to be good and holy as opposed to bad. But, this isn't the case because there is in fact bad out there in the world and the reason is because we as humans were given the right to choose for ourselves. Not only is there free will to choose between right and wrong but there also to love. We have the free will to love anyone we want and as many people as we want. If free will didn't exist then we would only be able to love one person for our life time which again isn't the case because there are so many divorces taking place because people fall out of love with each other. Another example is a prisoner may be said to possess no freedom, however he or she still possesses limited choices. In the very least the imprisoned human has the ability to make some action not determined by the institution whether it be to end his or her life or simply to speak certain words or make a specific eye…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Your point of view is well taken, Christianity once coming out of the Roman persecutions and becoming part of the Roman Empire Christianity took on a mission of intolerance towards nonbelievers and strongly against other religions. The people of Europe were constantly attacked for their nonbelief in the new religion that was predictably wanting to take over the world. Today, as back then, Christians go about their business blessing people, asking if they have been saved, do you want to know Jesus Christ, how about attending church with me this Sunday, and don't you want to go to heaven. Jesus intentions was to convert the world through love and actions. As you say he gave us the free will to do as we please with our lives. The first course…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays