Preview

pillar strength equation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
827 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
pillar strength equation
Pillars Factor of Safety (FOS) calculation method:
CMRI formula
CMRI developed a formula for pillar strength taking into account the pillar w/h ratio, the uniaxial compressive strength of the pillar, the height of seam and depth of cover S = Pillar strength (MPa) σc = Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) (MPa) h = Working height or seam height (in m)
H = Depth of cover (in m) w = Pillar width (in m)
Obert-Duvall/Wang Formula (Obert and Duvall, 1967)
It was derived from laboratory tests on hard rock and elasticity considerations the same relationship as did Bunting in 1911. Greenwald et al. (1939) mention that this form of an expression for pillar strength was proposed in 1900 for anthracite after laboratory tests made for the Scranton Engineers Club. This formula is given as Where σp is pillar strength, σ1 is uniaxial compressive strength of a cubical specimen (w/h = 1), and w and h are pillar dimensions. According to Obert and Duvall, this equation is valid for w/h ratios of 0.25 to 4.0, assuming gravity-loading conditions. Through back calculations from mining case histories and utilization of laboratory rock properties, safety factors of 2 to 4 were derived for short- and long-term pillar stability, respectively. Essentially, this safety factor accounts for strength scaling from laboratory (or rock-material) strength to in situ (or rock-mass) strength for hard rock.
Holland - Gaddy Formula
Holland & Gaddy, Holland (1964) extended the work by Gaddy (1956) and proposed the following formula: Where, k is the Gaddy factor, w and h is pillar dimensions in., and σp is pillar strength in psi. Holland specified a safety factor between 1.8 and 2.2 for the design of coal pillars, with a recommended value of 2.0. The width-to height ratio, for which the Holland formula is valid, ranges from 2 to 8. Although popular in the 1970s, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Structure Units City & Guilds Level 2 NVQ Diploma in Trowel Occupations (Construction) (6570-02) Contents 1 2 3 4 Introduction Structure Centre requirements Approval 4 5 6 6 Resource requirements 6 Learner entry requirements…

    • 17554 Words
    • 127 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Job Well Done

    • 5810 Words
    • 24 Pages

    The discusser, having a long and abiding interest in the engineering of jointed rock masses and a particular interest in shallow foundations on rock, welcomes the paper by Singh and Rao for its explicit recognition of rock mass as a discontinuum that requires treatment as such. There are many appealing aspects of the authors’ bearing capacity analysis compared to more conventional approaches. However, the discusser is not able to accept the fourfold failure mode hypothesis, which is fundamental to their concept of bearing capacity for jointed masses. The authors have described failure modes associated with splitting, shearing, sliding, and rotation based on the results of Singh’s testing of a jointed block mass in uniaxial compression and published literature. The discusser does not have access to Singh’s data Singh 1997 but is familiar with Brown’s triaxial tests on block jointed models Brown 1970 and accepts the four failure modes under those test conditions. These failure modes would have wide acceptance throughout rock mechanics circles under general conditions. The point of difference here is that shallow foundations represent particular boundary conditions associated with a half space and, as a consequence, certain failure modes are inhibited. Just as with jointed rock slopes the more likely failure modes are slip by sliding along joints, shearing and toppling by rotation and failure by…

    • 5810 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    εz = σzE – v σxE – v σyE σz = E(1+v)(1-2v) [(1 – v) εz + v(εx + εy)] F.S = Actual strength σutsRequired strength σw…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ways mathematics is related to these structures can be used in many ways. Like from different angles and sides. The Sphinx can also be measured by finding different shapes in it and making it an abstract shape. It can also be measured from all sides (perimeter). The pyramids obviously can be found through geometry and also other theories.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undrained Triaxial Test

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    5. Donaghe, R. T., Chaney, R. C., Silver, M. L. (1988) Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, STP 977, Illustrated, ASTM International.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: AUSTROAD (1992) “Austroads Bridge Design Code”. Sect 2 Design Loads. AUSTROAD, Sydney 1992. Mak J. & Lo S.R. (1996) Towards a limit state design specification for reinforced soil walls. Int Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Fukuoka, Japan, Nov 1996, 415-420. R57 (2002) “Design of reinforced soil walls”., Road and Traffic Authority, New South Wales, Australia. Lo (2001) “The application of numerical analysis to innovative design of geosynthetic reinforced soil wall”. Proc of 10-th Intl Conf. on Computer Methods and A dvances in Geomech., Balkema, 1245-1250. Lo (2002) “Partial factors and non-linear ground structure interaction”. Proc ICE., Geot Engr J., 156[1], 35-46. Padfield C.J. and Mair R.J. (1984) “Design of retaining walls embedded in stiff clay”. CIRIA Report 104. Simpson B. (1992) “Partial factors of safety for the design of retaining walls”. Geotechnique, 42[1], 131-136. Simpson B. and Driscoll R. (1998) Eurocode 7- a commentary. Construction Research Communication Ltd, Watford, U.K.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Huhuh

    • 20348 Words
    • 82 Pages

    * Construction IT Alliance Limited, “CITAX Project; Module 5 – Computer Aided Measurement”, 2008 http://d136186.u33.dc-servers.com/cita3/Downloads/45.pdf…

    • 20348 Words
    • 82 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    de la Vergne, J. (2003). Hard Rock Miner’s Handbook, Tempe/North Bay: McIntosh Engineering. pp. 4-12.…

    • 6363 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stifferness

    • 7300 Words
    • 30 Pages

    References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Longman: Dictionary of English Language and Culture, (1992), Longman Group UK Ltd, ISBN 0582 08676 0 Parker, S. P.: Dictionary of Engineering, 5th Edition, (1997), McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07052435-1 Ji, T. and Ellis, B. R.: ‘Effective bracing systems for temporary grandstands’, The Structural Engineer, (1997), 75/6, p 95-100 Gere, J. M. and Timoshenko, S. P.: Mechanics of Materials, (1990), PWS-KENT Publishing Company, ISBN 0 534 92174 4 Coates, R., Coutie, M. and Kong, F.: Structural Analysis, (1998), Chapman & Hall Roohi, R.: Analysis, testing and model demonstration of efficiency of different bracing arrangements, Investigative Project Report, (1998), UMIST Ji, T. and Bell, A. J.: ‘Seeing and touching structural concepts in class teaching’, Proc. of the Conf. on Civ. Eng. Education in the 21st Century, Southampton, UK, 26-28 April 2000 Anderson, J.: ‘Teaching health and safety at university’, Proc. of the Inst. of Civ. Eng., Journal of Civil Engineering, (1996), 114/2, p 98-99 Bennett, D.: Skyscrapers – Form & Function, (1995), Simon & Schuster ISBN 0-684-80318-6 Bobrowski, J.: ‘Design philosophy for long spans in buildings and bridges’, Journal of Structural Engineer, (1986), 64A/1, p 5-12 The Structural Engineer, 72/3, 1994 Lian, Q., Xie, Y. and Steven, G.: ‘Optimal topology design of bracing systems for multistorey steel frames’, J. of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126/7, p 823-829 Zalka, K. A.: Global Structural Analysis of Buildings,(2000), E & FN Spon, London, ISBN 0-41523483-2…

    • 7300 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terzaghi had developed the equation from model testing of a strip foundation, defining the depth of the foundation to be infinite relative to the width. One of the limitations with Terzaghi’s ultimate bearing capacity was adapting it to other situations. The equation did not take into account different shaped foundations, inclined loads and different depths of foundations. Some of the assumptions made by Terzaghi are incorrect and have not been dealt with. The assumption of a homogeneous soil is incorrect in the majority of cases and for my following experiment; the presence of bedrock does not fit in line with Terzaghi’s eqaution.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Typically concrete shafts at construction sites which need pile integrity assessment have steel bar reinforcements in them and these reinforcements stick out 1.5 to 3 m10 ft above the pile top. depending upon other factors. In general PIT records obtained on piles without reinforcements exhibit a smooth record where the velocity has an initial impact pulse. Beyond this the curve tends to shift downward due to soil resistance before it reaches the toe showing a rise in the curve again. The above described is an ideal record rarely realized under field conditions. Small variations in the pile cross sections, bulges and defects tend to change the shape of the output record. While these can be analyzed and conclusions regarding the location of the defect or bulge or excessive soil resistance or lack of soil resistance can be arrived at, distortions caused in the record due to wave traveling through the reinforcement at a different frequency and the lateral vibration caused in the steel make it difficult to analyze records and arrive at conclusions.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Save Environment

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages

    FOREWORD This Indian Standard ( Part 1 ) ( Fifth Revision ) was adopred by the Bureau of Indian Standards on 23 March 1990, after the draft finalized by the Timber Stores Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council. IS 10 : 1970 covered provisions relating to different components fourth revision it was published in the following five parts: IS No.…

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Happy Sad and Bold

    • 142637 Words
    • 571 Pages

    The information presented in this publication has been prepared in accordance with recognized engineering principles and is for general information only. While it is believed to be accurate, this information should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability, and applicability by a licensed professional engineer, designer, or architect. The publication of the material contained herein is not intended as a representation or warranty on the part of the American Institute of Steel Construction or of any other person named herein, that this information is suitable for any general or particular use or of freedom from infringement of any patent or patents. Anyone making use of this information assumes all liability arising from such use. Caution must be exercised when relying upon other specifications and codes developed by other bodies and incorporated by reference herein since such material may be modified or amended from time to time subsequent to the printing of this edition. The Institute bears no responsibility for such material other than to refer to it and incorporate it by reference at the time of the initial publication of this edition.…

    • 142637 Words
    • 571 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Self Compacting Concrete

    • 2873 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * EFNARC specification and guidelines for SCC, European federation of producers and applicators of specialist products for structures 2002.…

    • 2873 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conversion Factor

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Civil engineers throughout the world accept both the United States Customary System (USCS) and the System International (SI) units of measure for both applied and theoretical calculations. However, the SI units are much more widely used than those of the USCS. Hence, both the USCS and the SI units are presented for essentially every formula in this book. Thus, the user of the book can apply the formulas with confidence anywhere in the world. To permit even wider use of this text, this chapter contains the conversion factors needed to switch from one system to the other. For engineers unfamiliar with either system of units, the author suggests the following steps for becoming acquainted with the unknown system: 1. Prepare a list of measurements commonly used in your daily work. 2. Insert, opposite each known unit, the unit from the other system. Table 1.1 shows such a list of USCS units with corresponding SI units and symbols prepared by a civil engineer who normally uses the USCS. The SI units shown in Table 1.1 were obtained from Table 1.3 by the engineer. 3. Find, from a table of conversion factors, such as Table 1.3, the value used to convert from USCS to SI units. Insert each appropriate value in Table 1.2 from Table 1.3. 4. Apply the conversion values wherever necessary for the formulas in this book. 5. Recognize—here and now—that the most difficult aspect of becoming familiar with a new system of measurement is becoming comfortable with the names and magnitudes of the units. Numerical conversion is simple, once you have set up your own conversion table. Be careful, when using formulas containing a numerical constant, to convert the constant to that for the system you are using. You can, however, use the formula for the USCS units (when the formula is given in those units) and then convert the final result to the SI equivalent using Table 1.3. For the few formulas given in SI units, the reverse…

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics