Due to the psychological characteristics of humanity, and all humans’ universal inability to continually adhere to a universally agreed form of ethics, our species has no other option but to proclaim that further experimentation at this time in the science of human cloning is immoral. Before it can be addressed whether or not the benefits would outweigh the consequences, it must first be established what those prominent consequences are and since it is not possible to determine precisely what the benefits would be, the benefits presumed are instead based on possible probability. The idea of human cloning is truly bewildering. Combined with genetic engineering, it is the stuff of legendary science fiction. Imagine a human being created to be the epitome of perfection in all aspects; appearance, intellect, and health. It would be as though we were gifted with an evolutionary leap into our own futures long before it arrives on an intellectual level, and on a physiological level perhaps attaining a perfection of health and body that could have never existed. With great intellect comes great discovery, and humans are truly incapable of imagining with accuracy what the future holds, for example, there is no limit to the potential contributions that a clone manufactured to become the most intelligent human ever to exist could bring forward. When stated in this way, the idea of cloning humans sounds ultimately good. Surely such an individual would be treasured by our world, and valued for their accomplishments and benefits to humanity. The revelations that could be brought forward, the cures for disease, the greater understanding into what makes a human a human, the fundamental principles of the creation of life beyond what we currently are aware, these are all found in the study and experimentation of human cloning. But what would be the cost? Dr. Ian Wilmut, the man responsible for successfully cloning the sheep Dolly in 1996, claims that we should not clone humans for intelligence because genes are only 'part' of what makes one a genius. Wouldn’t this proposal be precisely why we should or would want to clone a human? By knowing before their existence that this human clone would have the potential to advance science, technology, or culture, and then proceeding to make investment in their futures by providing optimum environmental factors such as training and opportunity they very well could surpass the original genetic source. Human cloning results in a child born into a forced existence, not simply allowed. Clones are not planned due to emotional bonds nor do they come about through random happenstance of the enjoyment of sexual procreation, therefore they would never truly be viewed as natural or belonging to the species, and could never be allowed that which every person birthed with intent is entitled: the state of being wanted and loved simply because they became. This argument of equal existence jeopardizes the potential for agape love, and many other positive emotions. The emotions felt toward the clone could not necessarily be negative and perhaps would be most beneficent, for many arguments such as the infertile couple or the couple wishing to clone their deceased child would certainly love the child as parents are apt to do, but on the clone’s behalf this love will be eventually recognized as directed toward them not because of their many traits and qualities as an individual, but because of what they are. They will only be loved for the idea of that which they represent – the impossible child or the replacement. Imagine you are the first cloned human. You are special. You are different. You are unlike any other living creature on the planet. You have no “true” mother and father; you are a collection of cells manipulated into stopping and starting in a Petri dish to eventually result in the form of a human being. There were potentially hundreds of other “babies” of you but the majority of them...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document