Preview

Pascal's Wager and Anslem's theory of God

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pascal's Wager and Anslem's theory of God
Pascals Wager describes that either God exists, or he does not. By believing he does exist, you do not lose anything if its true that he does not truely exist. And if you believe that he exists and he DOES exist, you gain much from it. As the wager describes, happiness and eternal life.

Anslem thinks to have proven the existence of God by stating that God is meant as "the greatest being conceivable" or "a being than which nothing greater can be conceived." So Anslem states that the only way you could not believe in God is because you do not understand God and all that he is. He establishes that it is self-contradictory to deny that God exists because there could not be any being greater concieved and believing anything else is completely absurd and concludes to not being able to grasp the concept of God. Anslem argued that the proposition "God exists" is self-evident and can no more be denied than something as obvious as "a square has four sides" or "2 plus 2 equals 4." I think that Anslem believes he has proven the existence of God, but i do not agree. If this were true, then why hasn't anybody seen or scientifically proven the existence of God, this may be a theory of the fact that nothing could ever be greater than god, but what if God is not the greatest being ever concieved? It is not known and will probably never be known. God's existence solely exists in our minds as of now and to believe or not to believe is a matter of opinion and just like "the painting is beautiful" it is only an opinion that exists only in our minds and everyone has a different one. You have to believe that God is the greatest being ever concieved, most people have religious views of denying Gods existence and that does not mean they do not understand the concept of God, It just means they have different ideas and opinions of who God is and if he does or does not exist.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Wager Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pascal's Wager Rhetorical Analysis

    Pascal’s Wager is his attempt to justify the belief in God purely on appeal to possible personal gains. His argument is that it makes sense to believe in the God that is believed in by Christianity, therefore it makes sense for us to do so. Pascal believes that belief in God is the rational action to take, even if there is no evidence of God existing. In his work he finds various reasons to believe in God that are beneficial even if he/she does not exist. He also believes it is irrational to not believe in God. If you are an atheist you ultimately are missing out on the possibility of eternal happiness, because if there is no God you will not lose anything, but you will lose everything if there is a God.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anselm's Ontological Argument

    Anselm’s argument did lead to objections as most do. The first was that of a Monk Named Gaunilo, who argued against Anselm’s ontological Argument with the use of the concept of a perfect island. Gaunilo argued that concept of a perfect island does not prove that the existence of an island. In this case that perfection does not imply ‘existence’. Gaunilo claims that if the word God was replaced with the words perfect island, then Anselm’s ontological argument would not conclude that the perfect island exists. The fact Gaunilo was trying to bring across that a valid argument can never have true premises and a false conclusion, as the conclusion has to follow logically from the premises. Constructing a similar argument in which the conclusion is false shows that Anselm’s argument is flawed. Gaulino’s argument follows the basic form as such:…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God
    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God

    For Anselm, using logic that can be deducted about God, it is clear to see that God’s existence is necessary. In the second ontological argument from Anselm, God is the greatest being possible; it is greater to exist by necessity than by contingence, it is therefore, impossible for God to not exist. In this argument, God’s existence is an analytic statement, it is impossible to prove that God exists and although Anselm believes that it does not need to be proven, there is no way of knowing that it is analytic. For example take triangles, every triangle that anyone can ever think of will have 3 sides that all add up to 180 degrees, that is simply a part of what a triangle is. Humans can however, prove this by drawing every possible triangle and testing them to see, with God’s existence that is not possible. For humans to consider his existence as an analytic statement, they would have to go faith and logic alone. In a way God’s existence could be a synthetic statement, which would mean that it would need to proven before the statement was true or not, the reason for this is because whether God exists or not does not prove his existence in reality as Anselm suggests in his argument. Kant would agree with this as he reviews Anselm’s ontological argument by saying that God’s existence is not a predicate, existence may be a part of the concept of God, but it does not proof that God exists.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Anselm's Ontological Argument and Gaunilo's Response
    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anselm's Ontological Argument and Gaunilo's Response

    Anselm’s ontological argument, sourced from the “Proslogium” (with himself as the author), is a highly controversial argument that aims to prove the existence of God. This argument is an attempt of an a priori proof, that which uses purely uses intuition and reasoning alone (Oppy G. 1996). The argument (simplified) is as follows:…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    explanation that God necessarily exists. Anselm's goal is to prove to the "fool" that God has to…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does ‘Pascal’s Wager’ Provide a Convincing Argument for Belief in God?
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does ‘Pascal’s Wager’ Provide a Convincing Argument for Belief in God?

    Published in 1670 and named after French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal; the philosophical theory of Pascal’s Wager reasons that to believe in God is a decision made in a time of uncertainty. The Wager also explains that whether or not God exists, we can estimate the outcome; an infinite reward or an infinite punishment. This suggests that the rational choice to live as if God exists is the better of the possible choices; yet, through reason alone, one cannot come to the knowledge of God’s existence.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Alones Rhetorical Analysis
    • 3555 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Three Alones Rhetorical Analysis

    In his arguments, Pascal attempts to illustrate the attractiveness of Christianity by describing the human condition as one of inconstancy, boredom, and anxiety when we are distant from God. In a situation without God, humans are caught in a state of uncertainty, with no stable foundation upon which a meaningful and joyous life can be founded. We are inconstant in that we find it difficult to commit ourselves to a certain issue, only partially devoting our time and thought. Since God is the ultimate ontological good that humanity seeks, without God we are left restless and dissatisfied. Thus, we quickly become bored with our present existence, forever seeking diversions and vain pleasures that might fill the void within us. However, we are ever restless and unhappy until God completes us. As a result, the more inconstancy and boredom we feel, the more anxious we get in trying to obtain some sort of satisfaction in…

    • 3555 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    God's Existence and Aquinas Objection
    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    God's Existence and Aquinas Objection

    To understand Anselm's argument for God's existence, one must first understand the principles that forms the argument. The first principle is the claim that “nothing greater can be thought.” There is too types of existing, existing in understanding (existing0) and existing in reality (existing1). Then, we try to think of something is existing1. Anselm let “something” be “something than which nothing greater can be thought (NGT),” or in another word “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived” according to the Proslogion. The very first act of thinking that something is existing1 serves as the basis of it existing0. Because in the process of trying to think of something greater, we already establish its existence0. For example, there is a flower A, existing1. This flower A is the most beautiful flower, that this flower is a NGT. In order to prove this flower is NGT, one has to think of all the flower he has seen, flower B, C, or D. In the process of searching through one's mind trying to think of a flower that is more beautiful than flower A, flower A already exists in one's mind, which is existing0. To open his argument, Anselm then said an example of NGT is God.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay

    Anselm’s second argument states that it is logically necessary for God to exist. Anselm states that god is the greatest conceivable being, so it would be less great to imagine him not existing than to imagine him existing.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    St. Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    St. Anselm's Ontological Argument

    Anselm presented his argument in the second and third chapters of Proslogian. In chapter 2, Anselm says that God being than which none greater can be imagined is a conceptual truth. He acknowledged that a being that is present in both mind and reality is much greater than a being that exists only in the mind. Hence, if God only exists as an idea in the mind, we can think of something that is greater than God. We can think of the greatest possible being that does exist. This is a contradiction Anselm says. He says that we cannot think of something that is greater than God, for he is the greatest being of all. With this deductive reasoning, Anselm believes God is existent. In Chapter 3, he supports his topic in a different view. He says that a being that exists in reality is greater than a being that doesn’t exist in reality. Anselm states that by definition, “if God exists as an idea in the mind but not in reality, something greater is there.” Again he says that this is impossible. If God exists as an idea in the mind, God exists in reality. Since God exist in the mind, god exists in…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis

    Anselm’s ontological argument is an a priori proof of God’s existence. Anselm starts with an idea that depends on experience for their justification and then proceeds by purely logical means to the conclusion that God exists. His aim is to refute “the fool who says in his heart there is no God” (Psalms 14:1) this is showing that the ‘fool’ has important features which are; he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe God exists. Anselm said “an atheist cannot consistently be an atheist”, they want to challenge that God does not exist but by having an understanding concept of God, then he must exist. Anselm had a clear understanding of an all knowing, all powerful and an all loving God, thus believing God exists.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Wager vs. Descartes' Meditations
    • 1592 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pascal's Wager vs. Descartes' Meditations

    Pascal’s wager is a risk/benefit assessment to determine whether or not a person should believe in God. It in no way aims to prove that God exists. Unlike Descartes, who tries to prove God’s existence through the idea of God himself Pascal does not think such a proof can succeed. Pascal does a good job in his argument because he takes both sides into account and comes to a reasonable conclusion using mathematics. Overall, Pascal’s wager is preferable to Descartes’ meditations because they contain many errors and do not appeal to people outside of Descartes’ own mind or beliefs.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pascal Wager's Argument
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pascal Wager's Argument

    The existence of God has always been a commonly asked question in the world today. Since there is no scientifically proven answer, arguments have been accumulated over time. One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist, you can either wager for God or wager against God. This belief advocates the belief in God rather than providing evidence. Does Pascal's Wager commit the fallacy of appealing to consequences?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pascal's Argument For God
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pascal's Argument For God

    Pascal says “If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts nor limits, He has no affinity to us’’ (Pascal, 2). Throughout Pascal’s argument he makes the constant notion believing in order to gain finite happiness, how is it possible to know if God is willing to provide this infinite gain if he is infinitely incomprehensible? This critical mistake is the very reason Pascal’s argument doesn’t work, we just don’t have the knowledge to know about what truly happens after death. Pascal makes his argument for God by noting “you must wager. It is not optional” (Pascal, 3). In which one has the choice of believing in God or not to believe in God, whether we want to risk the chances of infinite happiness or to rot…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Blaise Pascal's Argument Analysis
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Blaise Pascal's Argument Analysis

    In Blaise Pascal’s “The Wager”, he takes a different approach to explain why we should believe in God. He forms his argument based on that “We cannot have any certainty regarding the existence of God. He exists or does not exist, but reason cannot tell us which” Pascal continues explain the wager as having four choices and the consequences that go with them. If someone believes in God and God does exist then they will be granted eternal rewards, if they do not believe and God does exist then it is eternal torment that they are in for. Now if someone believes but God does not exist, then they have lived their life as a good person, finally there is the chance that there is no god and therefore no reward or consequence. With this argument, Pascal…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics