Parthenon Vs Pantheon Essay

Roman architecture had taken a lot form Greek architecture. An example of it we can see in comparison of two important buildings - Greek Parthenon and Roman Pantheon. Dome-like arched structure of Pantheon was possible due to Roman's invention of concrete, however, there is still a lot from Greek architecture style.

Parthenon in Athens was built during the greatest time on the Athenian Empire, in 5th century BC. The construction was largely promoted by the politician Perikles (The Parthenon, n.d.). The Parthenon was built as a sign of gratitude to the gods for the defeat of Persians, who earlier destroyed Athenian acropolis. Parthenon was built as a temple for the goddess Athena - a goddess of Athens. Parthenon is built in Doric style with colonnade around the periphery of rectangular floor. It has a main room for the statue and a smaller room for treasure (The Parthenon, n.d.)

Pantheon in Rome was built during the reign of Augustus, in 2nd century AD (Pantheon, Rome, n.d.). It was later destroyed and rebuilt twice. It is dedicated to many gods and was intent to resemble the heavens. The Pantheon is a dome made of unreinforced solid concrete, first of it's kind. It is constructed by forming arches around a central axis. The portico is a symmetrical, classical design with three rows of
These two temples was built at different times and locations. The Parthenon of Athens in 432 BC, the Parthenon in Rome is built in 125 AD. The geometry of the buildings is different: Parthenon is rectangular and Pantheon is round (with square front). The Parthenon was built as a temple of one goddess - Athena, while Pantheon was built to resemble the heavens with all the Roman gods. These building also were constructed from different materials: marble, post and lintel for Parthenon and barrel, groin and concrete for Pantheon. The style of temples is also different - Doric in Parthenon and Corinthian in