Preview

The Parliamentary system vs. The Presidential system

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1442 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Parliamentary system vs. The Presidential system
IntroductionThe world of today has many different aspects towards the view of politics. Countries around the world all have diverse components, which makes that state in particular unique. The systems of the world are used to govern the state as its best of the ability according to the ideology and attitude of that particular state. Many states around the world are merging towards the democracy state and taking up many of its characteristics. The characteristics are not set for a specific one because each democracy in the world today contains different ones but essential ideas. The executive-legislative relation is one of these aspects and the state differs in which one is practiced. The presidential system is used by the democracy of the United States but on the other hand the parliamentary system is used by the democracy of Great Britain.

Characteristics of the systemsThe presidential system is a political system that holds the president as head of the government and the chief executive chosen in a democratic election. The president holds the office for a fixed term, which in the U.S. is for four years. There is separation of powers due to the fact that there is no overlap between the executive and the legislature and there are independent of one another. Being so, the president has no right in removing any of the legislature form office unless a vote is done under certain conditions. In this system there are limited number of parties and usually a two-party system. In the United States there is also a first-past-the-post electoral system and the offices are elected usually by the individual not as a party.

The parliamentary system is a political system that the head of the government role and the head of the state role are both assigned to separate executive individuals. The Prime Minister is the chief executive the leader of the party, which gets the majority of the vote to the legislature but does not hold a fixed term. The separation of powers is very



Bibliography: rmeanu, Oana. Lecture 15 Notes. Governing Systems and Executive-Legislative Relations.(2007, March 3). Governing Systemsand Executive-Legislative Relations: Presidential,Parliamentary and Hybrid Systems.http://magnet.undp.org/docs/parliaments/governing%20system.htm. Lijphart, Arend. Parlimentary versus Presidential Government. 2nd ed. London : Oxford UnivertyPress, 1992O 'Neil, Patrick. Essentials of Comparative Politics. 1st ed. New York, New York: W.W. Norton& Company, 2004.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When one thinks of presidents residing over a country, the most coveted powers come to mind, especially for United States citizens, where its chief has centralized command over important facets of the government. However, not all presidential systems are the same. For some, the title only bears a symbolic representation for head of state and nothing more. Other presidents find themselves sharing powers with additional officials. The most interesting comparison between presidential systems that have different processes of election and distributions of authority is the United States and France. The examination of the nomination process, voting measures, campaign spending, the media and debates will distinguish the election process. Only then is it fitting to compare and contrasts constitutional powers that each president holds and the shaping of these powers by the governmental system.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Currently, it is a raging matter on which form of government, representative or parliamentary, is best suited to solve a glove crisis such as the prevailing energy crisis or another gulf war. For instance, both governments may contemplate introducing speed limits on their highways of up to 53 mph because, of the worsening energy crisis. Interestingly, the two democracies have different methods of approaching any policy-making initiative owing to their differences in governance. Further, each democracy, representative (USA) or parliamentary (British), has its benefits and shortcomings. Despite this, the study argues that the U.S. representative democracy is best able to manage a global energy crisis between 2009-2011. The study is organized as follows: Section 1 compares the two forms of democracy. Section 2 is the case study.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important to understand the structure of the parliamentary system within which the machinery of government operates. Parliament is known as a bi-cameral legislature where by decision making autonomy resides with the lower house. The House of Commons and the House of Lords exists as a check upon the powers exerted by respective governments thou right it’s debating and ratification functions. In theory, the bi-cameral legislature in British political system exists to ensure that policy and legislation is created democratically and secondly to protect the country from autocracy or the emergence of dictatorships. Although it could be argued that both of these functions of parliament have been apparent in recent history. In this essay I aim to answer the question to what extent is parliament an effective constraint on the executive.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Presidential: Features a separation of powers between the executive and the legislative branches of the government.…

    • 257 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most recognized differences between a parliamentary and presidential system involves how the branches of government are organized. In a presidential government all three branches are separated. Parliamentary systems vest their executive power in the assembly. This means there is no separate executive branch.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Duverger, M. (1980). 'A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government '. European Journal of European Research, vol. 8, pp 165-187…

    • 1916 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia's government has a presidential - parliamentary system which consists of a dual executive with a president who is the head of state and a prime…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a multitude of political systems in the world ranging from free democracies to authoritarian regimes. Of these, however, three in particular stand out. These are the presidential system of countries such as the United States, Mexico and select other Latin American countries; the parliamentary system of countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany; and the semi-presidential system of countries such as France, Finland, and Senegal. In actuality there are many similarities between these three systems. Each, however, is also unique from each of the others. It is these similarities and contrasts, which will be the topic of this paper.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thus, the Presidential system follows a track to democracy by giving the people the change to have a right in saying and choosing what they find best for their nation. However, in a parliamentary system the ideas are different. Its track to democracy is attempted when the people are included in the parliament and the power of implementing policies is not just restricted to one person. Also, the systems have in common the fact that they depend on legislature, which helps the systems to execute and implement laws. Providing real life examples of countries and their running of the systems, will help evaluate to what extent these countries fit in the path of democracy and how their ideas are applied in reality.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lasswell, H. (1958). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How?, New York, McGraw-Hill, p. 3. Leftwich, A. (2004). What is Politics?, Oxford, Polity Press, p. 5.…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy of Kyrgyzstan

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Martin Slann. “Introduction to Politics: Governments and Nations in the Twenty-First Century.” (Thomson Learning 2008)…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays