Preview

Outline the Key Issue for the Social Approach

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1078 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Outline the Key Issue for the Social Approach
Blind obedience is when a person carries out an order even if it goes against their moral values or codes. Prejudice is an unjust attitude towards an individual solely based on their membership of a social group. Both of these issues were present in Abu Ghraib Prison (Iraq). They occurred when American soldiers commit terrible act upon Iraqi prisoners staying there. The soldiers claimed they were merely following orders, but scepticisms have been made about whether it was blind obedience or prejudice that made them commit the acts. There are 2 main theories that help to explain what blind obedience and prejudice are, and why they occur.
One theory is agency theory which was proposed by Milgram (1974). Agency theory suggests that at any particular time, a person is in one of two psychological states; an autonomous or an agentic state. When in an autonomous state, people are free, do as they wish and take responsibility for their actions. When in an agentic state, people surrender their free will and conscience and become agents to those of a higher authority. They let others direct their decisions and pass off the responsibility for the consequences to the person giving the orders. (When in an agentic state, it is possible for people to suffer from moral strain – this is when someone is told to do something that they feel is morally wrong, but do it anyway.) Milgram suggested that there are 2 things that need to be in place for someone to enter the agentic state: the first is the person giving orders to be seen as a legitimate figure qualified to direct other people’s behaviour, and the second is the person following orders must believe that the authority figure will accept responsibility for anything that happens.
A study to support this theory is Milgram’s study of obedience (1963) using electric shocks. In this study, Milgram wanted to answer the question, ‘are Germans different? ’Milgram asked 40 male participants to take part in a ‘learning and memory’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    John Darley’s criticism focuses on how the findings of the obedience experiments are applied to historical or real-world situations. He points out many ways in which the behavior of the obedience subjects in Milgram’s study differs drastically from the behavior of many others who commit atrocities: Nazi doctors or concentration camp executioners, for instance (Darley 133-134). However, since Darley’s criticism focuses on the behavioral differences between the obedience study and historical events, Milgram responds in a strong, convincing way. Referring to the process of comparing laboratory studies with real-world situations, Milgram writes, “The problem of generalizing from one to the other does not consist of point-for-point comparison between one and the other... but depends on whether one has reached a correct theoretical understanding of…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree with doing something horrific to another person, since it is easier to conform, than to fight, people tend to protect themselves before protecting a stranger. Stanley Milgram put a study together to prove that Germans are more likely to be obedient to authority then American are. The study was called “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably.” Milgram explains the character aspects of why people listen to authority and why they afraid not to. Social structure and the organization of society have a powerful affect on people. Milgrams set out to New Haven to start the study ad later on planed to go to Germany to do the study on the society there.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every human has a unique and complex thought processing system in which it is nearly impossible to determine how each person will react in a given situation. At an early age, people are taught to be obedient and oftentimes are forced to make a decision between being obedient or following their own morals. Usually, obedience wins because of the emphasis society has placed on it. Most of human’s actions are a result of a previous action in which they felt necessary to do. Both authors, Stanley Milgram of “The Perils of Obedience” and Ian Parker of “Obedience” agree that, humans, as a whole, will not respond the same in every similar situation because their actions are usually a result of obedience or of their current situation, rather than their personality.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicole Johnson

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963).…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s study of obedience (1963), had participants distributed electric shocks from 15 volts to 450 volts to confederates. The findings showed 65% of participants continued up to the maximum voltage of 450 but all participants went up to 300 volts with only 12.5% refusing to continue at the point the confederate first objected. They concluded that ordinary people are extremely obedient to authority even when asked to behave in an inhumane way. This suggests that it is not evil people that commit inhumane crimes but it is ordinary people who are just obeying orders. Taking this into consideration, this experiment suggests and explains why the soldiers obeyed the orders they were given; the behaviour of the perpetrators were the outcome of situation factors rather than dispositional factors.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram after advertising for volunteer participants were paid on arrival at the laboratory for their time. Participants, believing they were taking part in a memory experiment, were introduced in pairs to the experimenter where they ‘decided’ who was to be either a ‘teacher’ or a ‘learner’. In reality one of the ‘pairs’ of participants was a confederate and the chances were rigged so that the real participant was always the ‘teacher’. The experimenter explained that the ‘teacher’ would test the ‘learner’s’ memory, and when the ‘learner’ answered incorrectly would be asked to give him an electric shock. The ‘learner’ (who was the confederate) was strapped into a chair and wired up to the electric shock generator. So that the ‘teacher’ (the real participant) believed the electric shock generator was real, he was given a 45 volt electric shock. The electric shock generator had a row of switches marked from 15 to 450 volts in 15 volt increments with adjectives describing how severe the shock was, and 435 and 450 volts were labelled “XXX”.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Psychology Unit 1 Summary

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages

    • Wanted to know what factors led individuals to obey the orders of others and when they would allow their conscious to guide their behaviour…

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Visible Status - seeing authority (cops in uniforms or teachers having a larger desk in grade school or professors speaking on a stage like set up)…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 16 Psychology

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    23. What is obedience? What was Stanley Milgram’s experiment? What are factors that affected the level of obedience in the individuals he studied?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline a key issue for obedience, discuss by using theories/studies from obedience for what happened in Abu Ghraib…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Obedience shines a light on the negative aspects of humanity, whereas disobedience shines a light on the positive. It has been revealed how people will deny their own senses in order to remain indifferent from the majority (Asch). It was also exposed that some people are okay with possibly killing another human being as long as the victim is not considered their responsibility (Milgram). Both of these examples were a response of the individuals who chose to conform and obey rather than know the difference of what is morally right and wrong. Yet in the midst of it all areas of disobedience allows for different groups of people to come together and fight to evoke incredible change. However, disobedience is much more expensive than obedience. People willing to disobey must first find factors that will lead them to want to disobey and then pay the consequences after. On the other hand, suffering the consequences is a small price to pay compared to living with years of injustice. The factors that were discovered to aid in a person’s willingness to disobey, deception, education, and responsibility, all stimulate a certain degree of reflection. In contrast, members subject to obedience follow blindly with no reflection on the authority’s demands. This evidence directly relates to the findings by both Asch and Milgram. In their cases, the subjects were stripped of their individuality, which resulted in their conformity.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience to authority is an aspect present in all societies throughout known history. For the entirety of this paper, obedience to authority will refer to any act a member of society performs that he or she was told to do by a position of higher authority. This paper will focus on the idea that members of society will follow commands that may go against their moral beliefs on the sole account that the commands come from a place of higher authority. This statement has been tested multiple times beginning with Stanley Milgram’s experiment in 1963, in which he set up a scenario that convinced people they were harming an individual they had met only minutes before through electrical…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Milgram’s research has a lasting impact on psychology in various ways, initially as it triggered a large number of subsequent studies which is a desirable factor of the scientific method as replications demonstrate reliability and enhance our understanding, additionally the findings were counter- intuitive meaning that the findings weren’t equal to the predictions. The initial interviews indicated that people would not be willing to obey unjust orders controversially the findings illustrated the importance of situational factors. Mandel (1998) criticised Milgram’s research, he pointed to a real life study of a group of German policemen during the holocaust who behaved quite differently. Being physically close to their victims didn’t cause them to disobey. Mandel goes on to say that Milgram provided an obedience alibi and in real life people obey for different reasons, for example in the case of the holocaust, being prejudice against Jews. This questions the real benefits of Milgram’s study as it does not seem to represent real life circumstance.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays